Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
you said

If they do not state an intention, we cannot read their minds and thus cannot infer the intent - and there would be no conflict with the establishment clause. My two cents...

Would you extend this gracious exception to others whose intents are never spoken, but whose desire is clearly evident?

An example: Homsexuality

31 posted on 08/30/2002 4:41:37 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: highpockets
homsexuality should be homosexuality
32 posted on 08/30/2002 4:42:29 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: highpockets
Thank you for your post!

Would you extend this gracious exception to others whose intents are never spoken, but whose desire is clearly evident? An example: Homsexuality

I believe that is the "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the military with regard to homosexuality. The catch is your phrase "clearly evident" which would fail on the "don't tell" test.


33 posted on 08/30/2002 8:39:52 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson