Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The growing power of the blog: Hugh Hewitt explains future of major new Web trend
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, August 1, 2002 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 08/14/2002 12:59:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a blogaholic. Sure, I visit a few blogs every day, and I check InstaPundit every few hours. I have been known to vanish into The Corner at National Review for long stretches, and I can't understand why Virginia Postrel can't spare even 10 minutes a day from her new manuscript to update the Dynamist. But I am not hooked. I can stop whenever I want.

I read Mickey Kaus and Andrew Sullivan when they were both just ink-stained wretches, and I interviewed Eugene Volokh when he was wearing academic short-pants. Now that they have been absorbed into the Borg, er, Blog, they are just more available, not particularly different. But their collective power is growing. Growing rapidly, in fact.

Something very big is happening here, as was the case when radio gave print a big elbow, and then when television gave radio a huge body blow. The fourth generation has arrived, and it is wild out there. If you are a writer and not yet hit by the webscrum, wait until your work attracts the cybermob. You will never again be that lazy when it comes to fact-checking. This is the most obvious and most noted of the effects of the rise of the Blog.

Before long, however, the greybeards in the world of web-player-wannabes are going to figure out that the blogocracy matters a great deal in generating traffic to their sites, and the scramble to link to the big blogs will be on. I hope Glenn Reynolds, the force behind InstaPundit.com, turns aside offers from all but either the Washington Post or the New York Times. If a center-right blog marries a center-left paper, the offspring would be good for American politics and journalism.

Other changes have to be in the offing. The success of The Corner, wherein National Review's online editors and contributors talk to each other in full public view, heralds similar spaces at all major sites (can WorldNetDaily be far behind, or the Washington Times and Weekly Standard?)

The key link will emerge between radio and blogdom. Even as print and television have increasingly found themselves allied on the cable networks, the decentralization of both radio and the bloggers allows them to serve each other in a very healthy symbiosis. As a host, I need guests with brains and sharp opinions. Bloggers covet traffic which a network radio show can provide. The bloggers, in turn, send their readers to my site and the circle is complete.

The most revolutionary effect of blogging is still a ways off. The first three generations of media are remarkably age-, race- and gender-driven. What had originally been a reserve of white males is now a region of tortuous balancing and hypersensitive massaging of unspoken quotas. The blogosphere has none of that. It is the real marketplace of ideas, where there is no barrier to entry and Ragged Dick doesn't have to sell papers for very long if he's got talent.

As a result, there will be no forced retirement from the web if the blogger is deemed "too old" to keep a viewer's eye. In fact, looks and voice matter not at all. And neither do the political tastes of the editor-in-chief or the looney lefty on the city desk. Traffic is traffic and it can be measured and the market is the judge. If you can blog with effect until you are 95, more power to you.

And if you are 16, but brilliant, write this way, please.

Ultimately, the blogs force a choice upon you: If you join in and have the goods, you are opting out of elected life and any prayer of eventual judicial or other high-level governmental selection because candor is the first requirement of successful blogging … and there is no erasing your past work.

But if you can set aside those ambitions, the world of blogging is where the life of the mind has moved. Genuine argument is emerging from the stranglehold that the bigs of the first three generations have imposed upon it. "Cut and thrust" is back, and a web duel makes light sabers look tame. As a center-right conservative confident of the ideas on my side, this means very good things indeed.

Cheers to the revolution.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianlife; hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Wednesday, August 1, 2002

Quote of the Day by tractorman

1 posted on 08/14/2002 12:59:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuntB; nunya bidness; GrandmaC; Washington_minuteman; buffyt; Grampa Dave; blackie; CyberRebel; ...

Hugh Hewitt MEGA PING!!!


2 posted on 08/14/2002 1:00:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I have a very very bad confession to make lol :). The only web blog I regularly visit is Reese Schonfeld's blog at meandted.com. This guy is the co-founder of CNN, I have talked to him several times via instant messaging, this guy is also a big Lefty. The only reason I read it is because he has some interesting insight into the media and the CNN VS MSNBC VS FOXNEWS Cable Wars.
3 posted on 08/14/2002 1:14:17 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A dumb question, what is blog and how does it differ from FR?

I really don't have time for any more sites.
4 posted on 08/14/2002 1:15:46 AM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
a blog is an online journal where you write your toughts on every issues.
5 posted on 08/14/2002 1:17:15 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
bump for later
6 posted on 08/14/2002 1:18:51 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
No expert here, but my understanding is a Blog is like a daily (ongoing) internet diary where you lodge your musings/observations/take on the news or other things of interests.
7 posted on 08/14/2002 1:20:51 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
a blog is an online journal where you write your toughts on every issues.

That's correct.

8 posted on 08/14/2002 1:21:20 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
I Go Here Often
9 posted on 08/14/2002 1:27:54 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
I don't know html that well, so I messed up that address. Let me give it another go: Click here for a cool Blog

This site even has audio. Pretty cool.

10 posted on 08/14/2002 1:32:31 AM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
i meant to put levery-dayl issues.
11 posted on 08/14/2002 1:41:50 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
This guy is the co-founder of CNN,

Vade retro! Satanas!

12 posted on 08/14/2002 1:52:43 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
a blogging bump
13 posted on 08/14/2002 1:58:57 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
lol
14 posted on 08/14/2002 2:29:51 AM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hi John, thank you for the ping.
15 posted on 08/14/2002 3:17:07 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny
Morning, my friend =^)
16 posted on 08/14/2002 3:17:47 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Very good question. On a typical blog, there is no one challenging your opinion. Unlike FR, where given the same kind of thoughts and analysis being posted, yet anyone with a refinement, a correction, or even some off-the-wall opinion gets to counter that original thought, with the same additional thoughts of others having the same typographic weighing as the original thought.

Which kind of thought posting medium do you think liberals and eiltes love? Which do you think liberals and elites mock as nut-cases, rabble and incoherent?

Which do you like?

17 posted on 08/14/2002 3:31:39 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bvw
If everyone blogs..then who will comment on them?
18 posted on 08/14/2002 3:46:35 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
The bloggers link to one another -- but that is like collecting autographs in some memory book at graduation, indicating who one knows, but not very much as to how they know you, and certainly that is not a discussion, or really even not very much of an interchange of ideas.
19 posted on 08/14/2002 3:50:32 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
There is one thing about the bloggers that is better than FR, perhaps -- at least it's worth some discussion. That is the paypal click-through. "Support the blogger." Maybe FR could allow pay pal click-thoughs for posters. In fact, what would stop it now?

JohnHuang2 might then pull in some decent cash-flow for this hobby. And it would not take much from FR, as the posters making a trade of it would surely renumerate FR well-enough to sustain it.

20 posted on 08/14/2002 4:01:41 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson