[DoughtyOne]

Report: Mansour Ijaz, the Pakistani-American businessman who says he was rebuffed by the Clinton White House after negotiating a deal for the extradition of Osama bin Laden to the U.S. in 1996, has gained an important new witness who backs his story - none other than ex-President Clinton himself.

Clinton: At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

If Laden wasn't wanted by the United States for doing something against us, why did Mansour Ijaz even know who he was?  Did Ijaz have a silly habit of trying to arrange the extradition of unknowns to the US?  Somehow I doubt it.  Isn't it time for another "is = is" statement by Bill?

[kayak]

Excellent point you make in #4.

Can someone jog my memory? What did we know and when did we know it about a connection between OBL and the bombing of the WTC?

[Mike Darancette]

Report: Mansour Ijaz, the Pakistani-American businessman who says he was rebuffed by the Clinton White House after negotiating a deal for the extradition of Osama bin Laden to the U.S. in 1996, has gained an important new witness who backs his story - none other than ex-President Clinton himself.

Has Ijaz even been called to testify before either the House or Senate?

I wonder how anxious the DemocRATS are for that Non=Partisan comission now?

[Republican Wildcat]

Isn't it time for another "is = is" statement by Bill?

Exactly.