To: DoughtyOne
California is not a net provider in the tax roles. The US govt spends more money in California than California sends to Washington. Has been the case for a very long time.
Massachusetts is another egg-suckin' state. The US could profitably get along without either.
32 posted on
08/09/2002 4:27:29 PM PDT by
edger
To: edger
I'd have to see the figures that back that up. Which states are paying California's way? Where do you think the feds get the big bucks, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, Idaho, North and South Dakota, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa? They don't have the bucks to spare. It's my premise that without California these states would have problems they don't forsee at this time. If you can prove differently, I'm certainly willing to give it a look.
To: edger
Massachusetts is another egg-suckin' state And MAINE! Don't forget MAINE!
37 posted on
08/09/2002 5:02:05 PM PDT by
SheLion
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson