Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BG Paul W Tibbets, USAF, Ret: "That's their tough luck for being there."
The UK Guardian ^ | Tuesday August 6, 2002 | Studs Terkel

Posted on 08/06/2002 9:02:04 AM PDT by SlickWillard


Today is Hiroshima Day, the anniversary of the first use of a bomb so powerful that it would come to threaten the existence of the human race. Only two such devices have ever been used, but now, a decade after the end of the cold war, the world faces new dangers of nuclear attack - from India, Pakistan, Iraq, al-Qaida, and even the US. Launching a special investigation into nuclear weapons, Paul Tibbets, the man who piloted the Enola Gay on its mission to Japan, tells Studs Terkel why he has no regrets - and why he wouldn't hesitate to use it again

Studs Terkel

Tuesday August 6, 2002

Studs Terkel: We're seated here, two old gaffers. Me and Paul Tibbets, 89 years old, brigadier-general retired, in his home town of Columbus, Ohio, where has lived for many years.

Paul Tibbets: Hey, you've got to correct that. I'm only 87. You said 89.

ST: I know. See, I'm 90. So I got you beat by three years. Now we've had a nice lunch, you and I and your companion. I noticed as we sat in that restaurant, people passed by. They didn't know who you were. But once upon a time, you flew a plane called the Enola Gay over the city of Hiroshima, in Japan, on a Sunday morning - August 6 1945 - and a bomb fell. It was the atomic bomb, the first ever. And that particular moment changed the whole world around. You were the pilot of that plane.

PT: Yes, I was the pilot.

ST: And the Enola Gay was named after...

PT: My mother. She was Enola Gay Haggard before she married my dad, and my dad never supported me with the flying - he hated airplanes and motorcycles. When I told them I was going to leave college and go fly planes in the army air corps, my dad said, "Well, I've sent you through school, bought you automobiles, given you money to run around with the girls, but from here on, you're on your own. If you want to go kill yourself, go ahead, I don't give a damn." Then Mom just quietly said, "Paul, if you want to go fly airplanes, you're going to be all right." And that was that.

ST: Where was that?

PT: Well, that was Miami, Florida. My dad had been in the real estate business down there for years, and at that time he was retired. And I was going to school at Gaysville, Florida, but I had to leave after two years and go to Cincinnati because Florida had no medical school.

ST: You were thinking of being a doctor?

PT: I didn't think that, my father thought it. He said, "You're going to be a doctor," and I just nodded my head and that was it. And I started out that way; but about a year before, I was able to get into an airplane, fly it - I soloed - and I knew then that I had to go fly airplanes.

ST: Now by 1944 you were a pilot - a test pilot on the programme to develop the B-29 bomber. When did you get word that you had a special assignment?

PT: One day [in September 1944] I'm running a test on a B-29, I land, a man meets me. He says he just got a call from General Uzal Ent [commander of the second air force] at Colorado Springs, he wants me in his office the next morning at nine o'clock. He said, "Bring your clothing - your B4 bag - because you're not coming back." Well, I didn't know what it was and didn't pay any attention to it - it was just another assignment.

I got to Colorado Springs the next morning perfectly on time. A man named Lansdale met me, walked me to General Ent's office and closed the door behind me. With him was a man wearing a blue suit, a US Navy captain - that was William Parsons, who flew with me to Hiroshima - and Dr Norman Ramsey, Columbia University professor in nuclear physics. And Norman said: "OK, we've got what we call the Manhattan Project. What we're doing is trying to develop an atomic bomb. We've gotten to the point now where we can't go much further till we have airplanes to work with."

He gave me an explanation which probably lasted 45, 50 minutes, and they left. General Ent looked at me and said, "The other day, General Arnold [commander general of the army air corps] offered me three names." Both of the others were full colonels; I was lieutenant-colonel. He said that when General Arnold asked which of them could do this atomic weapons deal, he replied without hesitation, "Paul Tibbets is the man to do it." I said, "Well, thank you, sir." Then he laid out what was going on and it was up to me now to put together an organisation and train them to drop atomic weapons on both Europe and the Pacific - Tokyo.

ST: Interesting that they would have dropped it on Europe as well. We didn't know that.

PT: My edict was as clear as could be. Drop simultaneously in Europe and the Pacific because of the secrecy problem - you couldn't drop it in one part of the world without dropping it in the other. And so he said, "I don't know what to tell you, but I know you happen to have B-29s to start with. I've got a squadron in training in Nebraska - they have the best record so far of anybody we've got. I want you to go visit them, look at them, talk to them, do whatever you want. If they don't suit you, we'll get you some more." He said: "There's nobody could tell you what you have to do because nobody knows. If we can do anything to help you, ask me." I said thank you very much. He said, "Paul, be careful how you treat this responsibility, because if you're successful you'll probably be called a hero. And if you're unsuccessful, you might wind up in prison."

ST: Did you know the power of an atomic bomb? Were you told about that?

PT: No, I didn't know anything at that time. But I knew how to put an organisation together. He said, "Go take a look at the bases, and call me back and tell me which one you want." I wanted to get back to Grand Island Nebraska, that's where my wife and two kids were, where my laundry was done and all that stuff. But I thought, "Well, I'll go to Wendover [army airfield, in Utah] first and see what they've got." As I came in over the hills I saw it was a beautiful spot. It had been a final staging place for units that were going through combat crew training, and the guys ahead of me were the last P-47 fighter outfit. This lieutenant-colonel in charge said, "We've just been advised to stop here and I don't know what you want to do... but if it has anything to do with this base it's the most perfect base I've ever been on. You've got full machine shops, everybody's qualified, they know what they want to do. It's a good place."

ST: And now you chose your own crew.

PT: Well, I had mentally done it before that. I knew right away I was going to get Tom Ferebee [the Enola Gay's bombardier] and Theodore "Dutch" van Kirk [navigator] and Wyatt Duzenbury [flight engineer].

ST: Guys you had flown with in Europe?

PT: Yeah.

ST: And now you're training. And you're also talking to physicists like Robert Oppenheimer [senior scientist on the Manhattan project].

PT: I think I went to Los Alamos [the Manhattan project HQ] three times, and each time I got to see Dr Oppenheimer working in his own environment. Later, thinking about it, here's a young man, a brilliant person. And he's a chain smoker and he drinks cocktails. And he hates fat men. And General Leslie Groves [the general in charge of the Manhattan project], he's a fat man, and he hates people who smoke and drink. The two of them are the first, original odd couple.

ST: They had a feud, Groves and Oppenheimer?

PT: Yeah, but neither one of them showed it. Each one of them had a job to do.

ST: Did Oppenheimer tell you about the destructive nature of the bomb?

PT: No.

ST: How did you know about that?

PT: From Dr Ramsey. He said the only thing we can tell you about it is, it's going to explode with the force of 20,000 tons of TNT. I'd never seen 1lb of TNT blow up. I'd never heard of anybody who'd seen 100lbs of TNT blow up. All I felt was that this was gonna be one hell of a big bang.

ST: Twenty thousand tons - that's equivalent to how many planes full of bombs?

PT: Well, I think the two bombs that we used [at Hiroshima and Nagasaki] had more power than all the bombs the air force had used during the war on Europe.

ST: So Ramsey told you about the possibilities.

PT: Even though it was still theory, whatever those guys told me, that's what happened. So I was ready to say I wanted to go to war, but I wanted to ask Oppenheimer how to get away from the bomb after we dropped it. I told him that when we had dropped bombs in Europe and North Africa, we'd flown straight ahead after dropping them - which is also the trajectory of the bomb. But what should we do this time? He said, "You can't fly straight ahead because you'd be right over the top when it blows up and nobody would ever know you were there." He said I had to turn tangent to the expanding shockwave. I said, "Well, I've had some trigonometry, some physics. What is tangency in this case?" He said it was 159 degrees in either direction. "Turn 159 degrees as fast as you can and you'll be able to put yourself the greatest distance from where the bomb exploded."

ST: How many seconds did you have to make that turn?

PT: I had dropped enough practice bombs to realise that the charges would blow around 1,500ft in the air, so I would have 40 to 42 seconds to turn 159 degrees. I went back to Wendover as quick as I could and took the airplane up. I got myself to 25,000ft, and I practised turning, steeper, steeper, steeper and I got it where I could pull it round in 40 seconds. The tail was shaking dramatically and I was afraid of it breaking off, but I didn't quit. That was my goal. And I practised and practised until, without even thinking about it, I could do it in between 40 and 42, all the time. So, when that day came...

ST: You got the go-ahead on August 5.

PT: Yeah. We were in Tinian [the US island base in the Pacific] at the time we got the OK. They had sent this Norwegian to the weather station out on Guam [the US's westernmost territory] and I had a copy of his report. We said that, based on his forecast, the sixth day of August would be the best day that we could get over Honshu [the island on which Hiroshima stands]. So we did everything that had to be done to get the crews ready to go: airplane loaded, crews briefed, all of the things checked that you have to check before you can fly over enemy territory.

General Groves had a brigadier-general who was connected back to Washington DC by a special teletype machine. He stayed close to that thing all the time, notifying people back there, all by code, that we were preparing these airplanes to go any time after midnight on the sixth. And that's the way it worked out. We were ready to go at about four o'clock in the afternoon on the fifth and we got word from the president that we were free to go: "Use 'em as you wish." They give you a time you're supposed to drop your bomb on target and that was 9.15 in the morning , but that was Tinian time, one hour later than Japanese time. I told Dutch, "You figure it out what time we have to start after midnight to be over the target at 9am."

ST: That'd be Sunday morning.

PT: Well, we got going down the runway at right about 2.15am and we took off, we met our rendezvous guys, we made our flight up to what we call the initial point, that would be a geographic position that you could not mistake. Well, of course we had the best one in the world with the rivers and bridges and that big shrine. There was no mistaking what it was.

ST: So you had to have the right navigator to get it on the button.

PT: The airplane has a bomb sight connected to the autopilot and the bombardier puts figures in there for where he wants to be when he drops the weapon, and that's transmitted to the airplane. We always took into account what would happen if we had a failure and the bomb bay doors didn't open: we had a manual release put in each airplane so it was right down by the bombardier and he could pull on that. And the guys in the airplanes that followed us to drop the instruments needed to know when it was going to go. We were told not to use the radio, but, hell, I had to. I told them I would say, "One minute out," "Thirty seconds out," "Twenty seconds" and "Ten" and then I'd count, "Nine, eight, seven, six, five, four seconds", which would give them a time to drop their cargo. They knew what was going on because they knew where we were. And that's exactly the way it worked, it was absolutely perfect.

After we got the airplanes in formation I crawled into the tunnel and went back to tell the men, I said, "You know what we're doing today?" They said, "Well, yeah, we're going on a bombing mission." I said, "Yeah, we're going on a bombing mission, but it's a little bit special." My tailgunner, Bob Caron, was pretty alert. He said, "Colonel, we wouldn't be playing with atoms today, would we?" I said, "Bob, you've got it just exactly right." So I went back up in the front end and I told the navigator, bombardier, flight engineer, in turn. I said, "OK, this is an atom bomb we're dropping." They listened intently but I didn't see any change in their faces or anything else. Those guys were no idiots. We'd been fiddling round with the most peculiar-shaped things we'd ever seen.

So we're coming down. We get to that point where I say "one second" and by the time I'd got that second out of my mouth the airplane had lurched, because 10,000lbs had come out of the front. I'm in this turn now, tight as I can get it, that helps me hold my altitude and helps me hold my airspeed and everything else all the way round. When I level out, the nose is a little bit high and as I look up there the whole sky is lit up in the prettiest blues and pinks I've ever seen in my life. It was just great.

I tell people I tasted it. "Well," they say, "what do you mean?" When I was a child, if you had a cavity in your tooth the dentist put some mixture of some cotton or whatever it was and lead into your teeth and pounded them in with a hammer. I learned that if I had a spoon of ice-cream and touched one of those teeth I got this electrolysis and I got the taste of lead out of it. And I knew right away what it was.

OK, we're all going. We had been briefed to stay off the radios: "Don't say a damn word, what we do is we make this turn, we're going to get out of here as fast as we can." I want to get out over the sea of Japan because I know they can't find me over there. With that done we're home free. Then Tom Ferebee has to fill out his bombardier's report and Dutch, the navigator, has to fill out a log. Tom is working on his log and says, "Dutch, what time were we over the target?" And Dutch says, "Nine-fifteen plus 15 seconds." Ferebee says: "What lousy navigating. Fifteen seconds off!"

ST: Did you hear an explosion?

PT: Oh yeah. The shockwave was coming up at us after we turned. And the tailgunner said, "Here it comes." About the time he said that, we got this kick in the ass. I had accelerometers installed in all airplanes to record the magnitude of the bomb. It hit us with two and a half G. Next day, when we got figures from the scientists on what they had learned from all the things, they said, "When that bomb exploded, your airplane was 10 and half miles away from it."

ST: Did you see that mushroom cloud?

PT: You see all kinds of mushroom clouds, but they were made with different types of bombs. The Hiroshima bomb did not make a mushroom. It was what I call a stringer. It just came up. It was black as hell, and it had light and colours and white in it and grey colour in it and the top was like a folded-up Christmas tree.

ST: Do you have any idea what happened down below?

PT: Pandemonium! I think it's best stated by one of the historians, who said: "In one micro-second, the city of Hiroshima didn't exist."

ST: You came back, and you visited President Truman.

PT: We're talking 1948 now. I'm back in the Pentagon and I get notice from the chief of staff, Carl Spaatz, the first chief of staff of the air force. When we got to General Spaatz's office, General Doolittle was there, and a colonel named Dave Shillen. Spaatz said, "Gentlemen, I just got word from the president he wants us to go over to his office immediately." On the way over, Doolittle and Spaatz were doing some talking; I wasn't saying very much. When we got out of the car we were escorted right quick to the Oval Office. There was a black man there who always took care of Truman's needs and he said, "General Spaatz, will you please be facing the desk?" And now, facing the desk, Spaatz is on the right, Doolittle and Shillen. Of course, militarily speaking, that's the correct order: because Spaatz is senior, Doolittle has to sit to his left.

Then I was taken by this man and put in the chair that was right beside the president's desk, beside his left hand. Anyway, we got a cup of coffee and we got most of it consumed when Truman walked in and everybody stood on their feet. He said, "Sit down, please," and he had a big smile on his face and he said, "General Spaatz, I want to congratulate you on being first chief of the air force," because it was no longer the air corps. Spaatz said, "Thank you, sir, it's a great honour and I appreciate it." And he said to Doolittle: "That was a magnificent thing you pulled flying off of that carrier," and Doolittle said, "All in a day's work, Mr President." And he looked at Dave Shillen and said, "Colonel Shillen, I want to congratulate you on having the foresight to recognise the potential in aerial refuelling. We're gonna need it bad some day." And he said thank you very much.

Then he looked at me for 10 seconds and he didn't say anything. And when he finally did, he said, "What do you think?" I said, "Mr President, I think I did what I was told." He slapped his hand on the table and said: "You're damn right you did, and I'm the guy who sent you. If anybody gives you a hard time about it, refer them to me."

ST: Anybody ever give you a hard time?

PT: Nobody gave me a hard time.

ST: Do you ever have any second thoughts about the bomb?

PT: Second thoughts? No. Studs, look. Number one, I got into the air corps to defend the United States to the best of my ability. That's what I believe in and that's what I work for. Number two, I'd had so much experience with airplanes... I'd had jobs where there was no particular direction about how you do it and then of course I put this thing together with my own thoughts on how it should be because when I got the directive I was to be self-supporting at all times.

On the way to the target I was thinking: I can't think of any mistakes I've made. Maybe I did make a mistake: maybe I was too damned assured. At 29 years of age I was so shot in the ass with confidence I didn't think there was anything I couldn't do. Of course, that applied to airplanes and people. So, no, I had no problem with it. I knew we did the right thing because when I knew we'd be doing that I thought, yes, we're going to kill a lot of people, but by God we're going to save a lot of lives. We won't have to invade [Japan].

ST: Why did they drop the second one, the Bockscar [bomb] on Nagasaki?

PT: Unknown to anybody else - I knew it, but nobody else knew - there was a third one. See, the first bomb went off and they didn't hear anything out of the Japanese for two or three days. The second bomb was dropped and again they were silent for another couple of days. Then I got a phone call from General Curtis LeMay [chief of staff of the strategic air forces in the Pacific]. He said, "You got another one of those damn things?" I said, "Yessir." He said, "Where is it?" I said, "Over in Utah." He said, "Get it out here. You and your crew are going to fly it." I said, "Yessir." I sent word back and the crew loaded it on an airplane and we headed back to bring it right on out to Trinian and when they got it to California debarkation point, the war was over.

ST: What did General LeMay have in mind with the third one?

PT: Nobody knows.

ST: One big question. Since September 11, what are your thoughts? People talk about nukes, the hydrogen bomb.

PT: Let's put it this way. I don't know any more about these terrorists than you do, I know nothing. When they bombed the Trade Centre I couldn't believe what was going on. We've fought many enemies at different times. But we knew who they were and where they were. These people, we don't know who they are or where they are. That's the point that bothers me. Because they're gonna strike again, I'll put money on it. And it's going to be damned dramatic. But they're gonna do it in their own sweet time. We've got to get into a position where we can kill the bastards. None of this business of taking them to court, the hell with that. I wouldn't waste five seconds on them.

ST: What about the bomb? Einstein said the world has changed since the atom was split.

PT: That's right. It has changed.

ST: And Oppenheimer knew that.

PT: Oppenheimer is dead. He did something for the world and people don't understand. And it is a free world.

ST: One last thing, when you hear people say, "Let's nuke 'em," "Let's nuke these people," what do you think?

PT: Oh, I wouldn't hesitate if I had the choice. I'd wipe 'em out. You're gonna kill innocent people at the same time, but we've never fought a damn war anywhere in the world where they didn't kill innocent people. If the newspapers would just cut out the shit: "You've killed so many civilians." That's their tough luck for being there.

ST: By the way, I forgot to say Enola Gay was originally called number 82. How did your mother feel about having her name on it?

PT: Well, I can only tell you what my dad said. My mother never changed her expression very much about anything, whether it was serious or light, but when she'd get tickled, her stomach would jiggle. My dad said to me that when the telephone in Miami rang, my mother was quiet first. Then, when it was announced on the radio, he said: "You should have seen the old gal's belly jiggle on that one."

· Further information on the Enola Gay can be found at www.theenolagay.com.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: KenGum4
I wonder how Gen. Tibbet has had to deal with 100,000 deaths...

General Tibbets and some of the Enola Gay crew were in Yuma, Arizona about three years ago. A person in the crowd asked him if he had any regrets. Without pause, he said that he had absolutely none. To a person, the crew agreed and the audience gave them a standing ovation.

141 posted on 08/06/2002 8:59:46 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rond
"When we embrace the madness, we become mad ourselves."

Run Forrest Run!

What the Hell does that mean? Scheeuuppss.....do you whiney nitwits ever get tired of being so completely sold out to moronic notions?

142 posted on 08/06/2002 9:01:34 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
What utter nonsense. The bombs ended the war on August 15, 1945. Case closed.

Rightwing2 pontificated:

Even after the dropping of the two atomic bombs, the Japanese Cabinet agreed to surrender with the condition that the position of the Emperor not be prejudiced, a condition that was subsequently accepted by the US so upon historical reflection it seems clear that the dropping of the atomic bombs accomplished absolutely nothing.

143 posted on 08/06/2002 9:44:45 PM PDT by Tickle Me Pank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Here is one of our own that participated in this event. Sadly, he is gone: http://www.mishalov.com/Ferebee.html
144 posted on 08/07/2002 1:12:33 AM PDT by doglot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
The Japanese government had accepted defeat and was desperately searching for a way out.

All they had to do was utter those two magic words "We surrender".

145 posted on 08/07/2002 1:55:45 AM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
With all due respect to General Tibbits, I can honestly say that he is a disgrace to the proud uniform of the United States Army.

You are the one who is a disgrace. How many wars have you fought in and helped to win for the United States? General Tibbets is a patriotic American who helped to turn the tide in WWII. He should hold his head up high in knowing that he served his country well and wore his uniform proudly. General Tibbets is a true American hero.

146 posted on 08/07/2002 2:24:05 AM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: doglot
That was an cool link, thanks!
I had heard Ferebee's name before but didn't know he was a fellow North Carolinian.

The following section from that link reminded me of something:

At 8:15:17 a.m. on Aug. 6, 1945, Colonel Ferebee, then a 26-year-old major, pushed a lever in his B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay, making sure an automatic system he had activated seconds earlier had functioned. He watched as a single, 9,000-pound bomb turned nose-down and fell toward its target, Aioi Bridge, which he had personally selected from aerial photographs.

Only a couple of months ago, part of that system, which was kept by one of the Enola Gay crew members, was auctioned.
Here is a link to the story:

Hiroshima bomb parts cleared for sale


Two bomb plugs from the Little Boy atomic bomb

147 posted on 08/07/2002 5:58:20 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
In "un-used" condition, presumably.
148 posted on 08/07/2002 8:27:11 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
I guess they had to be removed before it was dropped?
149 posted on 08/07/2002 8:33:30 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
I just read the story to which you'd linked. They were used. (Just not when the bomb left Enola Gay).
150 posted on 08/07/2002 8:37:54 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
The Germans **ELECTED** Hitler. (And don't bore me with arguments about the Depression, or the turnout in the election).

While I agree with the rest of your post, this portion of it is wrong. Hitler was invited by Hindenburg to form a government in 1933 after unsuccessfully running for the German Presidency in 1932. He was never elected to anything (at least not in a fair election) by the German people.

As an aside, I will hopefully have the pleasure of meeting General Tibbets when he comes to my city at the end of this month. As far as the morality of killing in war goes, it is in fact the moral responsibility of everyone involved in war to finish it as soon as possible. Marquis Kido, the Japanese Lord Privy Seal in 1945, said after the war that without the dropping of the atomic bomb, Japan probably could not have stopped fighting.

151 posted on 08/07/2002 9:16:01 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
I'm so glad you found and posted this interview. It is a fascinating history lesson and a portrait of a genuine American hero. May God continue to bless America with courageous, patriotic individuals like General Tibbets. They are the best of the best.
152 posted on 08/07/2002 11:04:17 AM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilor; rond
There is no such thing as innocent civilians.

That's what Hitler said. It justified his mass slaughter of the Jews in the nation's that comprised Germany's enemies. That's what Tojo said to justify his slaughter of Phillipine and Chinese civilians. That's what Stalin said when he sent his troops to rape, pillage and murder the innocent population of Germany. So I guess from your perspective you are in good company. Seriously, you make a very chilling statement. Based on your statement, You would support the Iraqi slaughter of your own children as long as you could slaughter Iraqi babies too. You may want to think this through a bit more and ask yourself if this is what you truly believe.
153 posted on 08/08/2002 4:33:01 PM PDT by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2; Scholastic; rond
You obviously missed reading pretty much every E-mail I have written that it is morally wrong to kill a civilian not in ALL cases, but in ALL cases where the slaughter of innocent civilians is intended as the objective or one of the objectives of the attack as was the case in the US atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Japan. Civilians killed by collatoral damage such as your in your example are clearly acceptable under the Just War Theory which is why Desert Storm qualified as a just war justly fought by the US. Please try to read all of my E-mails on this thread next time you respond to them since if you had you would not have mistated my views here.

The deliberate slaughter of innocent civilians in pursuit of a political or "military" objective is the very definition of terrorism. Accordingly, the US atomic bombings and firebombings of Japanese cities were terrorist acts unworthy of a great and good country like ours. Fortunately, these were the exception to the rule for US military history.
154 posted on 08/08/2002 4:48:12 PM PDT by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; rond; Scholastic
John Toland also wrote a couple of really good books, At Dawn We Slept and Infamy which detail how liberal Democrap President FDR first goaded Japan into attacking us, then withheld vital intelligence from Pearl which would have provided them with plenty of notice to help fight off the Japanese attack and save the lives of untold hundreds. FDR deliberately sacrificed the lives of 2,000 brave US sailors to get the US in the war against Germany on the side of the Brits. He was a disgraceful President, but this is the conniving, morally unscrupulous behavior that we have expected little better from liberal Democrap philandering Presidents.
155 posted on 08/08/2002 4:54:06 PM PDT by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Your assessment runs counter to that of every veteran of the war that I have ever met...to a man, they believe that the dropping of the bombs saved their lives, and the lives of hundreds of thousands of their fellow countrymen.

Your comment reminds me of a remark I got from one of my undergraduate history professors in the 1970s. We were in the last few weeks of a course on 20th Century Warfare, and the subject material had come around to the closing days of WWII, specifically the atomic bombs dropped on Japan.

He brought up the traditional academic views: the war was already over; the Naval leaders were convinced the Japs would quit as a result of the Naval blockade; the bombs were dropped to keep the Russians from invading the Japanese home islands. Stuff like that.

I brought up to him what you have essentially cited in your comment above, because my father would have been one of those troops to hit the beaches of Japan. I was surprised by his response, not by the dogma it represented, but the contempt it show blatantly exposed. He said:

"Fortunately, the political leadership of this country does not concern itself with the problems of some sweating sergeant in a foxhole in the Pacific. The administration had more important concerns to consider."

That remark was made more than 30 years ago. But I remembered it. Word for word. To this day. Says a lot about the kinder-gentler-tolerance-and-compassion crowd, now doesn't it?

156 posted on 08/08/2002 5:23:37 PM PDT by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
In post 26 I say, “Loss of lives in a military operation are acceptable under certain circumstances and completely in line with Just War theory.”

To which you respond in post 70 with “If you seriously believe that, then you obviously know nothing about Just War Theory and are merely attempting to twist it to justify past atrocities committed by another former Democrap President (Truman).”

Please note: I say civilian causalities are acceptable under CERTAIN circumstances and you most vehemently disagree with that statement. You make it quite clear that you believe civilian casualties are not acceptable under ANY circumstances. In fact, I am not the only one led to believe you think civilian casualties are morally wrong in all cases. In post 32, rond takes up your position as he says, “I think Rightwing2 is spot-on with this elegant, succinct belief: the killing of innocents is always morally wrong. Doesn't matter the place, the time, the circumstances. It's wrong and we should not be a party to such barbarism.”

Re The Bomb: I say again, the military gain was proportional to the civilian loss as the war was over almost immediately because of the bombing and thus saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives that would otherwise have been lost. You may disagree, but so what, there are people on both sides of this issue.

Referring to Robert W. Tucker’s definitive work on Just War theory (“The Just War,” John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1960), we find he directly addresses the Hiroshima question and comes to the conclusion the bombing was justified, and on humanitarian grounds no less.

Tucker writes: “In this way the use of atomic weapons against Hiroshima and Nagasaki could be and indeed was justified, not only as a military necessity, but also as a legitimate application in war of the principle of humanity.” He then goes on to quote Henry Stimson explaining in a nut-shell the rationale for the bombing (“I felt that to extract a genuine surrender from the Emperor and his military advisers, they must be administered a tremendous shock which would carry convincing proof of our power to destroy the Empire. Such an effective shock would save many times the number of lives, both American and Japanese, that it would cost.”)

Now, if you wish to ignore Tucker on this point, that is fine. However, I would suggest you refrain from heavy reference to Just War theory while at the same time you ignore Tuckers stance on The Bomb. Further, I respectfully suggest you use caution when you accuse others of not knowing Just War theory merely because they accept Just War theory as it relates to The Bomb and you do not. You are a better thinker than that.

So, given your statement where you object to the notion that civilian casualties are acceptable under certain condition (post 70), and another statement where you say they are (post 90), I think you need to be a bit more consistent. My posts have been clear on this matter all along.

As I’ve said, “Killing innocents is always regrettable, but not morally wrong in all cases. The evolution of Just War and morality of killing has evolved over time, and even the Conventions on war recognize that in war innocents sometimes get hurt/killed. What matters in the aim and proportional goal of the act that caused the injury/death.”

Have a nice day.
157 posted on 08/08/2002 6:25:59 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Euro-American Scum
Thanks for your long-term and enlightening perspective on this...some things never change. Liberals are still most generally arrogant snobs who think they are smarter than everybody else, even when all the evidence is against them.

Thank God these kind of pantywaists are not in charge of our national security...at least not since the departure of the Clinton Gang.

Regards,
EV

158 posted on 08/08/2002 6:33:32 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: rond
So did future President Eisenhower. The latter's words seem most applicable here:
"Japan was already defeated and dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary ... I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives."


A General Officer turned politician commenting on measures to save American lives does not impress me.

Heres a quote most Sergeants know;

"Nothing is too hard for the man that dosen't have to do it"

I doubt Ike would have been the first man off the landing craft to invade the home islands.
159 posted on 08/08/2002 6:52:25 PM PDT by MP5SD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
First of all Hitler, Tojo, and Stalin did not 'say' that nor did they use it to justify anything. Please do not infer what you like from my statements. As for what I truly believe in a 'real' war (congressionally approved) the objective a timely end (i.e.: Smash the enemy ASAP) all targets are justified only their relevance to the end of the war need be called into question. However, this doesn't apply when trying to assassinate a particle person/persons (taliban, al quida, or Sadamn and the Bath party)
160 posted on 08/09/2002 5:41:08 AM PDT by gilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson