Skip to comments.
Vigilante neighbors in court for branding molester
Detroit Free Press ^
| August 6, 2002
| L.L. BRASIER
Posted on 08/06/2002 7:42:18 AM PDT by kcpopps
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:12:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Three Pontiac men took the law -- and a blistering hot metal spatula -- into their hands when they learned a neighbor had been regularly sodomizing his 7- and 10-year-old nephews.
Two of the men held down the uncle while the third pressed the smoking spatula on his genitals, buttocks, stomach and legs. They paused only long enough to reheat the spatula on the kitchen stove for repeated branding before tossing the uncle out onto the sidewalk, breaking his arm.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: vigilante
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: JMJ333
I disagree. I don't think this is the way to deal with such creeps at all.
For one thing, he lived to tell his side of the story. Very bad plan unless he's far to scared to tell the cops, but willing to tell every pedophile he sees.
No, this wasn't well thought out at all. Other pedophiles will think they can count on our court system to protect them from vigilante justice. The proper method would be for him to never be seen nor heard from again, but all sorts of extremely frightening stories of his fate start circulating in the pedophile chat rooms.
Shalom.
81
posted on
08/06/2002 10:15:52 AM PDT
by
ArGee
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
To: JMJ333
I am gratified that he won't be harming the nephew anymore. It might even be theraputic for the nephew. He now knows that there are adults who love him and will protect him, even if it means they have to go to jail.
Shalom.
83
posted on
08/06/2002 10:20:24 AM PDT
by
ArGee
To: ArGee
Well, I was venting a bit. I was going to scream for tar and feathering but that has gone out of fashion.
84
posted on
08/06/2002 10:20:47 AM PDT
by
JMJ333
To: kcpopps
"Americans appear much more willing to take matters into their hands, either by taking a greater role in protecting themselves, or by . . . going after the bad guys," he said. "That is not a good thing, because often the punishment is much harsher, more brutal, than what is appropriate," Fox said. "That's why we have laws, a system, to handle crime and punishment."
This sounds to me like they are afraid of citizens' outrage. But I'll bet this is one kid-diddler who won't offend again for a while...
85
posted on
08/06/2002 10:25:07 AM PDT
by
redhead
To: hometoroost
but this sounds like a sick and methodical plot to inflict very, very cruel and unusual punishment.The same could be said of sodomizing 7 - 10 year old boys.
To: kcpopps
That the government or any agent of it believes they have the moral imperative to dictate behavior to any citizen in this regard, in light of the fact that it is they who continually re release these perpetual offenders, is illustrative of the depths of hubris, arrogance and disconnection with those who they purport to represent. Hey statists, we will not offer our throats to be slit in the name of "justice" for criminals. Do you understand that you do not have, never have had, and never will have the power to regulate behavior.
The chaos in the society you claim to protect is evidence of this.
We know why you want the guns, too.
87
posted on
08/06/2002 10:31:56 AM PDT
by
galt-jw
To: kcpopps
Lock child molestors up. No parole. Ever. Until DNA evidence shows that they were wrongly convicted and didn't do it. Then, let them go.
Somehow, I doubt that killing them or torturing them really deters other molestors. I don't think any thought of consequences goes through their minds in the moments before committing these heinous crimes. Otherwise, the 8-40 vs. a few moments of pleasure seems like it ought to deter any being rational enough to be deterred by torture or death.
And, unless I'm mistaken, the article does not say they castrated him, so he'll probably get out and do it some more.
If you're going to be a vigilante, the only sensible thing to do is shoot the child-molestor in the brain. Kill them quickly. That is surefire prevention of recidivism and you don't become a torturer in the bargain.
To: kcpopps
I can't condone what was done, but I don't think people would feel so driven to vigilante justice if there were more justice in the system. People see the revolving-door courtrooms and are getting fed up. These people need to be kept locked up if they mess with kids. Period.
8 to 40 years. What the h*** is the 8 years about? That means you can only mess with a kid after 8 years to me. These people are incurable. They can never be counted on to control their deviant impulses.
89
posted on
08/06/2002 10:34:41 AM PDT
by
Aliska
To: asformeandformyhouse
but this sounds like a sick and methodical plot to inflict very, very cruel and unusual punishment. The same could be said of sodomizing 7 - 10 year old boys.
That's my point exactly. Sounds like a four of these whackos should be locked up forever.
To: Joe Hadenuf
If anyone did this to mine, and I caught them in the act or had proof of the event, I would shoot the SOB on the spot...I wouldn't be able to help myself.. He would be dead in short order. I have posted this before in the context of what I would tell a boy who wants to date my daughter but I think it bears repeating here.
If you hurt my child, you won't need to worry about what your parents will say or what your friends will say. Don't worry about the police or the courts either. If you hurt my child, you need to be afraid of what I will do. I don't mean you need to worry, I mean you need to be testicles-crawling-up-your-guts afraid. You can't get far enough away to avoid the reach of my arm. No matter how far or how fast you run, I will be behind you. Do not sleep, do not eat, do not rest. I will find you and when I do I will make you sorry that your mother ever met your father. Your family won't protect you. The law won't protect you. And if G-d Himself should ask me what I thought I was doing, I will answer, "I was defending my child."
Shalom.
91
posted on
08/06/2002 10:39:24 AM PDT
by
ArGee
To: BlazingArizona
About 6 months ago a woman in my area shot a man who molested her child in the groin. The grand jury decided not to indict her.
92
posted on
08/06/2002 10:49:48 AM PDT
by
Dianna
To: kcpopps
In some places in the US, these three would also have been charged with a "sexual orientation" hate crime. The term "sexual orientation" is much broader than just homosexual orientation. It can be and has been used to protect people whose "orientation" is toward children
To: Joe Hadenuf
Someone earlier said the 3 S rule... shoot, shovel, silence
94
posted on
08/06/2002 12:15:58 PM PDT
by
kcpopps
To: headsonpikes
Socialism is a religion of peace. bravo!
To: Joe Hadenuf
I agree with you 100%. However, the perp would not be shot first. I would torture this person in ways that I can't post here. He would suffer tremendously. Then I might shoot him. But then, why waste a bullet?
96
posted on
08/06/2002 12:25:08 PM PDT
by
MsCynic
To: ArGee
You and I sound very similar on this issue.
To: apillar
You're absolutely insane and I fear for your neighbors.
To: opinionator; apillar
You're absolutely insane and I fear for your neighbors.Works for me. If we had a few more of these friendly chats by the neighbors, I bet we'd have a lot less crime. apillar, I grew up in the South and I know exactly what kind of visits you're talking about. Nothing too harsh, but the message was gotten across crystal clear. Too bad it doesn't happen anymore
To: kcpopps
Two of the men held down the uncle while the third pressed the smoking spatula on his genitals, buttocks, stomach and legs. I strongly disapprove of this action. The fact that they only scarred areas covered by clothing is inescusable. They should have branded the words 'CHILD MOLESTER' on his forehead.
100
posted on
08/06/2002 1:44:23 PM PDT
by
Sloth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson