Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

An old article, but worth the read for culture warriors.
1 posted on 08/04/2002 10:32:32 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Khepera
Can you use the SASU ping list for me? Thanks. =)
2 posted on 08/04/2002 10:33:47 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
In her book, The Sacrament of Abortion, she calls for “new rituals as well as laws to restore to abortion its sacred dimension.”

Actually its the sequel to "The Sacrament of Kristallnacht"

What a sick, sick women.

3 posted on 08/04/2002 11:01:25 PM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Reply to post #1: Pot heads are another group who fall totally into this catagory.
4 posted on 08/04/2002 11:20:02 PM PDT by A6M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333; Avoiding_Sulla
A truly excellent article, demonstrating the tendency for moral disorder to infect an entire society. A depressing read, for those who hope for moral regeneration.
5 posted on 08/05/2002 12:45:15 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
My God, what a terrific, terrific piece! Is it really old? Thank you for posting it in any case!

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

8 posted on 08/05/2002 5:41:34 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Bump
9 posted on 08/05/2002 5:44:58 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
What an excellent post! But I'm sorry to say that this essay stirred in me a feeling of loss. Is there really a way to bring the culture back other than to live one's life according to the standards he expounds upon as moral? I don't think there is, specifically because of the collusion the author touches upon, of so many of our citizens, in the advancement of these evils.

And to my mind their collusion is all the more damning and effective, because it is a collusion of silence in the face of apparent evil for the sole reward of not having to endure ridicule or criticism because of a belief. In other words their collusion is motivated by cowardice, and not a type of cowardice that a person might be able to understand, such as acting in a certain manner because one's life might hang in the balance. It amounts to no more than a fear of popular opinion. And that type of cowardice really scares me.

19 posted on 08/05/2002 7:59:44 AM PDT by Aedammair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
bump
25 posted on 08/05/2002 9:06:06 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
This isn't an old article; it's a timeless one. I referred to this essay in An Unholy Sacrament for an Inhuman Race. Abortion is merely a sacrament for today's Godless, hedonistic society. It is a return to the ancient ritual of child sacrifice.
27 posted on 08/05/2002 9:41:45 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
It's a little musty," but it's also a little "fusty." The write has been stricken by Academian's Disease, in which the language and setup obscures and delays the point he's trying to make.

If you cannot tell the gist of a piece by the end of the first paragraph, then it's too late.

Michael

31 posted on 08/05/2002 10:51:55 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333; Khepera
The virtual reality of the rationalization is stronger than the actual reality of the child. The child succumbs to the rationalization and is killed in a new "sacrament."

Hence the reason some people post graphic picturs of the "results of abortion," right Kepera?

Nice post, JMJ333.

One of the things that I've noticed about moral rationalization is that people rarely rationalize highly immoral things. Consider that every person has a line they will not cross. For example, in sex, it's OK to kiss a non-spouse but not to French kiss, etc. When the person decides to cross the line and rationalize the decision, they also move the line. It's not that they've rationalized doing a bad thing, but (as the article states) they've made the bad thing good. Now it's OK to French kiss a non-spouse, but not to grope. But groping is no worse today than French kissing was yesterday. Therefore the rationalization to move the line again is just as easy as it was before, if not easier due to the practice.

This is where the moral slippery slope comes from. What was wrong has become right, what was horrific (pedophelia) is now mearly a bad idea (because it doesn't involve consent).

Shalom.

37 posted on 08/05/2002 11:49:09 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Thanks so much for posting this. It has been my philosophy for so many years, but I am not quite as thorough or articulate. Mine is a very simple summary: "Everyone HATES to be wrong, and will do anything they have to do to deny anyone else (including God) the right to say they are wrong."

Often, these liberal arguments to "prove I'm right" come with elaborate, rational-sounding reasons. When push comes to shove, however, these folks cover their ears and begin calling names... (intolerant, bigot, religious fanatic, etc.)

41 posted on 08/05/2002 12:23:15 PM PDT by HeadOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson