1 posted on
08/04/2002 2:28:37 AM PDT by
sarcasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: sarcasm
The Kennedy crime family versus the traitorous Clinton crime family.
2 posted on
08/04/2002 2:30:41 AM PDT by
dennisw
To: sarcasm
The focus of both families' lobbying is Terry McAuliffe, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, who will pick the convention location this fall. The clinton's bag man.
Guess who he's going to pick.
3 posted on
08/04/2002 2:42:50 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: sarcasm
Some members of the committee complained that they did not see enough minorities on the mayor's staff, among workers at the FleetCenter (the proposed site of the convention), and at some receptions they attended.Well now. Expect to see a bunch of white guys lose their positions to affirmative action replacements.
6 posted on
08/04/2002 2:52:33 AM PDT by
woofer
To: sarcasm
Would you prefer extraction or drilling?
9 posted on
08/04/2002 3:19:14 AM PDT by
billhilly
To: sarcasm
John and Robert Kennedy were both shot for what they wanted to do.
Teddy might do well to remember what happened to Vince Foster.
To: sarcasm
Well you know both have killed people and covered it up to further their careers. Which is responsible for more killings? Hitlery. Which is the bigger turd? Now that's a toss up.
To: sarcasm
On one hand, New York has had to deal with the WTC Atrocity and shouldn't have the RATS inflicted on it. On the other, Boston is too damned close to New Hampshire to have a convention of liars, cheats, sex offenders and perverts.
How about Trinity Site in New Mexico. We can celebrate the first nuc by dropping a modern one on their sorry asses.
To: sarcasm
''She's got a story to tell. I respect that and understand that, but I still think Boston has a very compelling story,'' he said. ''I think it tells the story of the great struggles of the Democratic Party in the past and its commitment to liberty going back to the early days of the Revolution, through the abolitionist movement, to the whole period of equal rights for women, to the new economies, and the future.''Does anybody else have a problem recognizing the Dems as the abolishinist party?
Talk about revisionist history! Sheesh...
15 posted on
08/04/2002 4:28:49 AM PDT by
metesky
To: sarcasm
What CLINTON FAMILY ?
It's one person
16 posted on
08/04/2002 4:47:39 AM PDT by
uncbob
To: sarcasm
Bill Clinton is considered perhaps the party's sharpest political mind I've always considered Bill Clinton to be the party's most bent penis....
To: sarcasm
Just what the Democratic Party needs. Please, God, don't let them grow a brain.
18 posted on
08/04/2002 5:10:30 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: sarcasm
I have been hearing on the news for weeks that the Dems were going to have their convention in Detroit and that it was a done deal. Detroit spent hundreds of thousands squiring around the Dems on yachts and tours of the city.
Let's hope it's in NYC. I couldn't bear the thought of more Dems in Detroit. It was making me queezy.
To: sarcasm
All the discussion in the world will not change the fact that the convention will be held in New York, and that Miss Hitlery will accept the nomination.
21 posted on
08/04/2002 5:58:10 AM PDT by
abclily
To: sarcasm
Has the Kennedys' time as the party's first family ended, with the torch being passed to a new generation, the Clintons?From bad to worse ;-)
22 posted on
08/04/2002 5:58:56 AM PDT by
varon
To: sarcasm
''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''''It's just a friendly competition, obviously,''
To: sarcasm
Thank you for posting this.
The probability statistic to be assigned to Hillary Regina not running is .000317, give or take a little. The Bubba Rex machine is just cranking up. '08 is too late for her.
HR will not seek out the nomination directly. She will thrive in the putrid Petri dish of Dem politics by standing to the side of the direct efforts of Al Borg, Kerry, et al.
The media will put a camera on her at every turn (edited to reveal only the 'pretty-in-pink' aspect)- Gag. As push comes closer to the 2004 shove, and Bush has economic woes to deal with, and the Borg is undermined by McAuliffe/HR/BR, she will be increasingly portrayed as the star power which must be drafted for the Dems to win. She will also be on the lookout for the 2004 counterpart of the 1933 Reichstag fire to exploit - whether she starts it or not. She will also settle for VPOTUS. She will keep the Vince Foster team at the ready and 'her' convention will be in New York.
Can she win nationally? I don't really think so. But I was dead wrong about 92, 96 and her senate bid. The American electorate has the average political discrimination capability of an animal cracker. The next couple of election cycles will see Goebbels reincarnated on a staggering scale. We are in deep weeds.
Blessings on Freepers Everywhere.
26 posted on
08/04/2002 6:19:38 AM PDT by
esopman
To: sarcasm
Throughout the 1990s, the Kennedys and Clintons also fed off each other, I never knew parasites could fed off each other
27 posted on
08/04/2002 6:33:46 AM PDT by
JZoback
To: sarcasm
New York was budgeting up to $75 million for the convention
Excuse me New York, but if you have $75 million to waste on a polictical convention, why do you need any more federal money?
Since we do not have a "dog" in this fight, we can sit back and enjoy it. I hope Kennedy really wants the Convention in Boston, and is willing to use some of his polictical clout to fight for it. This of course require Hillary to get nasty (which she does so well).
If we are lucky it will be like two scorpions fighting to the death.
Who has the popcorn.
To: sarcasm
While the Globe and the rest of the media is focusing on the "fued", I found one statement in there that is probably the most telling about not only this - but what the entire DEMONCRAP Party is about.
Standing just off the Senate floor where he has served for 40 years, Kennedy said: ''I think she understands the symbolism of having the convention in New York, and certainly there's something to speak for that. But I also think she has some appreciation for the symbolism of having the convention in Boston.''
That's what it is all about for these morons - SYBOLISM OVER SUBSTANCE. Instead of saying something like "While I would love to have the convention in Boston, in the end it is what we do at the convention that matters not the location" --- all the DUMBOCRAPS can see is the SYBOLISM of where it is held.
29 posted on
08/04/2002 6:34:50 AM PDT by
commish
To: sarcasm
Any chance they might duke it out with bazookas?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson