Russian scientist has Anti-Gravity technology? (My Title)

Extract from Jane's Defence Weekly | 7/29/02 | By Nick Cook, JDW Aerospace Consultant, London

[ovrtaxt]

As far as I'm concerned, until we have a Grand Unified Theory, anybody claiming this is impossible is full of it. We simply don't have enough knowledge about the universe to know.

I thought we did! Here's the info I've seen, is this right or not? http://www.geocities.com/igala1/official_home_of_gagut.htm

[blam]

Good article/pictures. Thanks.

[theDentist]

The Professor tests his new
anti-gravity device.

" Next Stop, Mars-skie!"

[wotan]

QM and GR in their current state are incompatible. I don't think anyone would claim that GR is not correct, its just not the whole picture.

QM or GR must be incorrect if they are incompatible.

Reasons for believing GR is incorrect include (1) the gravitational force is the result of the curvature of space-time rather than the exchange of force carrier particles, (2) there is a flat-space alternative to GR that gives the same results (QM assumes flat space), (3) QM allows amplitudes for particles to travel faster than light which is incompatible with the idea that space-time is a four-dimensional metric space with the Minkowski metric (per GR), and (4) there is an almost hysterical response to any criticism of GR.

[spetznaz]

called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield.

I know i may be risking your ire by mentioning so called 'experimental weapons' but have you heard of the tests in Australia of an ion weapon that utilizes and conductive beam followed by an ionic charge that uses the first beam as a conductive path to the target? It is a joint US-Australian project that may be used to defend against ballistic missiles and the like.

Different from the plan to use Lasers fielded from flying Jumbo Jets (since this particular project uses ion beams that act as conduits for charged plasma instead of amplified light) but for the same purpose.

Anyways it seems interesting that different nations seem to be trying out quite novell ways of battlefield technology. Maybe the whole 'Death Ray' thing of the sixties may come true (which i read faced several problems like the need for huge amounts of electricity).

Maybe half a century from now a grunt will ask for a stealth UCAV to come down with suppressing fire from its 'ion plasma conduit,' or maybe request a 'vaporising impulse gravity energy beam' from an orbiting satellite (if satellite weapons have been allowed then).

Hey, a guy can dream. :D

[The Duke]

Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space

Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, posing with his secret forumla

[The Duke]

Ooops...I guess for some reason I can't post images...shucks!

[mikegi]

Nonsense. I could make a theory of gravitation where fundamental particles are tiny living beings that would allow control. Does that make my new theory more valid than Einstein's? Of course not.

If you want to read a much more interesting theory of gravity control and propulsion, try Vesselin Petkov's: Petkov's papers.

[staytrue]

I used to think the creationists were a waste of bandwidth. Stories like these make the creationists sound reasonable.

[In veno, veritas]

" then you're betting against the laws of thermodynamics, and nobody has ever won that bet.'

The laws used to state that mass can be neither created nor destoyed, untill people such as Enrico Fermi diproved it.

[Rockitz]

You apparently didn't read my post clearly or missed my point. Don't get stuck on the term "perpetual motion." In the water cycle, the sun is the source of energy which vaporizes water and allows it to collect in clouds again and then rain down on earth creating energy as it turns a water wheel or a turbine. This looks as though it is a free source of energy but the energy of the sun has been neglected in the equation and thus it appears to be a perpetual motion machine.

[freebilly]

Exactly! There are no free rides. Thanks for the clarification.

[Crispy]

"I don't know there really is a god. I simply believe it. That's why it's called faith. If you wish to simply believe this gravity thing is possible, I'm fine with that."

You misread what I wrote. I did not say I believed it...

[medved]

Thanks, that's interesting stuff. the claim that:

It appears to follow from the Reissner-Nordstrom solution of Einstein's equations that the charge of a body reduces its gravitational field.

indicates that the man is at least headed in the right general direction.

Sansbury's theories regarding light and gravitation are supported by several recent findings, not least of which are the cesium gas experiments. A number of physicists view that as basically creating some sort of a resonant effect which eliminates the lapse time which Sansbury describes as creating the effect of a "speed of light".

[Drammach]

Will it separate a moose from its cheese? Also, could these experiments been causing all this other stuff, even though I am still wearing 2 tinfoil helmets?

Thank You for Your response.
It is my scientific opinion that Moose will be seperated from cheese, depending on the iron content of the cheese.
I would also observe, Electrostatic energy will make the Moose's hair stand on end and spark, while the cheese has no hair. ( with the exception of french hair cheese.)

I am assuming that since You are wearing 2 (two) tinfoil helmets that You are sane, and one of them protects "future generations".
It is only thus that I dare to respond.
"The truth is Other".