Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US prisoners claim Roosevelt left them in Philippines deliberately
scotsman.com ^ | Tue 30 Jul 2002 | David Cox

Posted on 07/30/2002 1:03:01 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

HUNDREDS of former US prisoners of war have begun a battle for compensation after uncovering documents that allegedly prove the wartime administration deliberately used them as a tool to whip up domestic support for war with Japan.

A former prisoner has uncovered papers in the US National Archive that she claims prove the government restricted the travel of 7,000 American citizens from the Philippines, while at the same time encouraging evacuation of Americans from other potential Japanese targets in China and south-east Asia.

A federal lawsuit filed yesterday in Washington, DC, alleges that the government at first wanted to keep Americans in the Philippines to discourage Japanese aggression, but later used them as a political tool.

A group of 500 former prisoners claim the plan was devised by the US wartime leader, Franklin D Roosevelt. with the approval of Winston Churchill, Britain’s Prime Minister, to cause outrage among American citizens unwilling to back a war on Japan.

Americans were denied passport and travel documents to let them flee. They were later captured by the Japanese and held in notorious camps under appalling conditions.

Marcia Fee Achenbach, one of those captured, was four when her camp was liberated by US soldiers in 1944. She discovered the papers while doing research in the National Archive. Among the evidence uncovered was a telegram that Francis Sayre, the high commissioner of the Philippines, had sent to the US state department urging an evacuation plan. The state department’s confidential reply read: "Visualise the remaining of Americans generally in the Philippines in an emergency, and plan accordingly."

Other evidence includes a letter from one of the commissioner’s secretaries indicating that officials were not to issue passports. The secretary states that she wrote more than 5,000 letters rejecting passport applications during the build up to Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

In the notorious Philippine POW camps, starvation and disease were rampant, and hundreds died as internees were reduced to eating cats, dogs, rats and weeds to survive. Many of the camp’s leaders were executed by the Japanese as the US army advanced to recapture the islands. Ms Achenbach said: "I remember having to run around to get away from the shelling. I grew up thinking that we were in the wrong place at the wrong time. I was angry and astounded to find out later I didn’t have to go through some of the things I went through."

Anthony D’Amato, the lawyer who filed the suit, believes the orders came directly from Roosevelt. He also thinks the US leader discussed his plans for the Philippines in telephone talks with Churchill.

Transcripts of those conversations were ordered to be sealed indefinitely by President Harry Truman, but Mr D’Amato is asking for them to be made public. "We believe this smoking gun is in those transcripts," he said.

Frances Cogan, a professor at the University of Oregon, said the government had other reasons for its actions. "It was thought that if they moved the Americans out of the Philippines, it would look like we were going to launch a war against Japan," said Prof Cogan, author of Captured: The Internment of American civilians in the Philippines 1941-1945. "Another reason was to keep the Filipino people from feeling they had been deserted and left to rot."

Regarding the actions of US officials, Prof Cogan said: "Certainly they lied. Certainly they kept them from leaving and getting transportation out. The effect was that people remained there, however they did it and for whatever reasons."

Even if the allegations are proved, legal experts say winning a suit against the government over a wartime event that that happened 60 years ago may not lead to the desired apology. One complication is that the prisoners have already received some financial recompense. After their release, former prisoners were paid one dollar for each day of internment from the proceeds of a sale of Japanese assets frozen in other countries. As part of that deal, the United States and other nations waived the rights of their citizens to sue Japan.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: fdr; powmia; roosevelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2002 1:03:01 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Roosevelt was a Democrat, he'd never leave the children behind.
2 posted on 07/30/2002 1:11:47 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
bump
3 posted on 07/30/2002 1:20:04 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; Tailgunner Joe
Looks like P.J. O'Rourke was right. FDR was rolled up the access ramp to the gates of hell.
4 posted on 07/30/2002 1:20:09 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Oh, you would not think he would sacrifice over 2,000 Americans at Pearl harbor would U? Nahhh.....
5 posted on 07/30/2002 1:23:46 PM PDT by haole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I can understand this woman's resentment, but her suit is better directed against the politicians who negotiated the Naval Holiday Treaty of 1925. That treaty was consumated at the behest of Great Britain, who, impoverished by the World War 1 could build no new ships. The solution was to freeze the status quo. The US junked the superdreadnoughts building in the yads and imposed a moratorium on the fortification of the Philippine Islands.

Faced with the facts that it could neither defend nor succor the islands given the restrictions, te Navy actually wanted to withdraw all substantial Army garrisons from the Phililppines (see War Plan Orange). In any scenario, it could only be recovered two to three years after hostilities had commenced.

Leonard Wood and other Army men with ties to the Philippines refused to withdraw the garrisons. In hindsight, the Navy proved right, and the Philippines was the scene of the largest surrender of US forces in history, though not in shame.
6 posted on 07/30/2002 1:24:58 PM PDT by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"...administration deliberately used them as a tool...."

Heck, I obviously missed out on being a movie star for the year I was used a tool of an abandoned US foreign policy in Vietnam. Maybe I oughtta find me a lefty lawer, too.

7 posted on 07/30/2002 1:31:07 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
 
Transcripts of those conversations were ordered
to be sealed indefinitely by President Harry Truman,

When a 'free country,' 'under God', finds it
necessary to do what Truman did, alarms
should go off (come on?) and stay on, indefinitely.

8 posted on 07/30/2002 1:33:00 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Leonard Wood and other Army men with ties to the Philippines refused to withdraw the garrisons.

Churchill managed to get the troops off the Beaches of Dunkirk - Nuff Said.

9 posted on 07/30/2002 1:33:55 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
"Churchill managed to get the troops off the Beaches of Dunkirk - Nuff Said."

Churchill had estimated that he could rescue 40,000. The tenacity of the English people, in everything but a bath tub, rescued 340,000. Many were French troops.

10 posted on 07/30/2002 1:44:37 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

This sort of thing goes on all the time, and has so throughout all of history, on small and large scales. Politics, mandates, security and re-election concerns are all thrown into a pot and people of power simply get to choose how they dish it out.

The world is in desperate need of something...
11 posted on 07/30/2002 1:51:18 PM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
The world is in desperate need of something

HOW BOUT CHRIST? .....I think its in dire need of him

12 posted on 07/30/2002 1:55:58 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Couldn't hurt!
13 posted on 07/30/2002 2:08:44 PM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Reparations! We need reparations!
14 posted on 07/30/2002 2:13:18 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob; All
Just another reason to not trust your government!
15 posted on 07/30/2002 2:30:46 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: haole
You're telling me you never saw this coming? OMG I can't believe people never thought this was possible. Fortunely Roosevelt had the wisdom and forsight that if he hadn't done the things he did well.. we might just be under a German flag right now.
16 posted on 07/30/2002 2:42:09 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
For additional discussion, see Suit says FDR used Americans as bait to spark World War II.
17 posted on 07/30/2002 2:45:44 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
AH, but it's much more lucrative and fun to scream VICTIM and, at least try, to rake in the $$$$$. It is insane for us to judge what actions were taken 60 years ago to insure our victory in WWII.

It is true that Americans and Congress was very against getting involved in a European War, much less a war with Japan (that had not yet been declared by Japan). If we had stayed isolationists we would probably all be speaking German and worshiping Hirihito, or maybe a war on our soil just appealed to Congress more than sending money and boys to Europe.
18 posted on 07/30/2002 2:54:02 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
So, I guess you don't care what actions are taken against YOU to win the war on terrorism now?
19 posted on 07/30/2002 2:58:12 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
I made it through WWII with most of my rights intact, and that was during a democratic administration. I guess I'll be ok now, with what rights I have left. Don't see how I can stop or help except by voting, and I do that. If you're looking for a fight, look somewhere else.
20 posted on 07/30/2002 3:08:31 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson