That the public should not know of the threat from hostile missiles, nor have other reasons to clamor for maintaining our military defense, was his top priority --- his deception to enable "the left's" advancing a "politically correct cultural revolution" throughout the military-industrial complex --- to erode our defense stamina.
At least one of his assumptions, was that the leftists' theory of peaceful co-existence would pre-empt any hostile attack upon "the lower 48."
He accompanied that with the artful re-construction of any incident; his productions that, there is nothing to fear for which we would need a military ... while he protested the many other things which he attempted to lead the people into fearing, in order to garnish support for ever-more central power over the people.
Clinton was nothing more than a continuation of the 1960s' student movement to take over the White House and experiment with theoretical group-nationalizing socialization as the wonder-drug with which to salve all wounds.
Where otherwise, to be resolved in the common defense, to be so determined to not bargain for liberty --- the stamina for maintaining freedom is not in Clintonism's extremist, fascist, so-called "liberal" [mind-]set of cards.
To wit: The "Center Wing Tank" killed Vince Foster ... because it could happen in Camelot, the mythological, leftist Utopia that is home to all kinds of "experts" with "expertise" on how to re-construct, re-interpret, re-define yet "not recall" the truth.
Because the truth, is, and in stark contrast to the "reality" for which the leftists are always marching.
So there was nothing to fear, militarily, in regard to our common defense --- by Order of the "President" to "make it go away."
Into this, his "defense" policy, flew both a hostile missile and TWA 800.
The only part of the Navy Missile Theory that sticks in my craw is that many people would have had to know the truth, or if not the truth, then that the official version was a lie. It is improbably that - I'm guessing the number - one hundred of these would remain silent. But then intimidation of family members is a powerful deterrent.
Have we had a rash of unexplained deaths of former crewmembers of [can't remember the name of the ship]?
No, I lean more toward the Iranian Submarine theory.
What can I say except ‘Bravo’!
Jayne: Quote of the day?