[JohnFiorentino]

Precisely, because it is highly doubtful that what did in TWA Fl800 was an "explosion" in the CWT. There MAY have been some type of low yield overpressure early on, perhaps even at the time of the IE. After all we do have CW-504 at the Western most point in the debris field with an A/C unit and nose tire.

But there were other events which most likely were the true IE.

[Swordmaker]

Have you noticed that Asmode does not respond to my posts? I think it is because he cannot refute them. He will respond to others' comments BASED on one of my posts and quote something I may have said... but never does he respond. I met his challenge and posted a detailed time-line for the destruction of Flight 800 yet we hear not a peep out of him referencing that time-line. Do you suppose it is because my work is based on the math, the data, the evidence, and that I am willing to discuss my reasoning for making the conclusions I have?

Asmodeus is not; he just links back to his website of compiled twaddle and blithers about "expert witness report analysts" as though the witness testimony was the ONLY evidence at hand. Any "expert" witnes report ananlyst can only evaluate the incompetent FBI agent's 302 reports not the actual witnesses' statements. The 302s are notes written by third parties unfamiliar with aircraft accident investigations FROM RECOLLECTIONS of what witnesses were ALLOWED to say in response to the incompetents' incompetent questions and often leading questions.

Many of the witnesses, when shown the 302 reports of their interview have flatly denied they said what the FBI says they did. Of course you will not find an "expert witness report analyst" who will agree with anything in the 302s... because they are NOT WITNESS REPORTS! No one ever properly questioned any of the witnesses as far as I can see. Some attempts were made years after the events.