Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Airline Pilot sues NTSB for "Zoom-climb" data
http://www.twa800.com/lahr/lahr-amended.htm ^ | 7/27/02 | John Fiorentino

Posted on 07/27/2002 8:30:11 AM PDT by JohnFiorentino

Retired airline Pilot Capt. Ray Lahr has brought suit against the NTSB for release of the data pertaining to the alleged "zoom-climb" by TWA800. NTSB has stated that this event was what the hundreds of witnesses observed prior to the TWA800 explosion.

You can view the amended complaint in it's entirety here:

http://www.twa800.com/lahr/lahr-amended.htm


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aviation; boeing; cia; fbi; ntsb; twa800list; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 981-990 next last
To: mach.08
Are you taking too much medication? You seem to be coming apart at the seams.

861 posted on 08/30/2002 8:44:44 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

Comment #862 Removed by Moderator

To: Asmodeus
Truth is determined by evidence - not suspicions, speculations, allegations or accusations

So are you confessing your sins to us Asmondeus? One would have to assume as much, as you have not answered any questions posed to you concerning evidence (or that purported to be evidence by you). You have done nothing but speculate, allegate, and accuse. The material that you've posted has been shown to be incorrect, flawed, and misguided.

The only purpose I can see for you to post that blurb is that you want to come clean. Is that what you want to do Asmodeus?

You continued to smear the late Commander Donaldson and portray him as a opportunistic flake. You continued to portray those of us that seek the truth in this matter as "vigilante Storm Troopers", "Tinfoil hats", and various other derogotory terms.

It is YOU who calls himself Asmodeus, which IS a demonic name attributed to the "destroyer" in the Book of Revelations. I find it peculiar and odd that you would utilize that name as your screen name here on FR.

And that IS a statement of fact.

863 posted on 08/31/2002 1:12:28 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Deliberately and maliciously inciting suspicion, fear and hatred of those who disagree with them has been a trademark of the "shootdown" tinfoil hats for over six years now.

Substitute the word "disinfo agent" for the "shootdown tinfoil hats", and you'd be on the way towards telling us the truth Asmodeus..

864 posted on 08/31/2002 1:26:31 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: All
Capt Ray Lahr's Lawsuit Dismissed Without Prejudice

FOIA Request Refiled

Capt Ray Lahr's lawsuit against NTSB has been dismissed without prejudice by the courts. A dismissal without prejudice means the plaintiff has the right to refile.

Capt. Lahr has in fact reworded and refiled another FOIA request.

You can view the pertinent details at the following URL's

http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/dismissal.gif
http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/new-foia-1.gif
http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/new-foia-2.gif
865 posted on 08/31/2002 6:49:43 AM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
I have a feeling that this matter will never fully be revealed, and will remain in the realm of "conspiracy theory" as the players involved will never allow the true story to see the light of day...
866 posted on 08/31/2002 10:05:41 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
I think we'll get to the bottom of it, IF we persevere. And I think we will.

I know for myself, I intend on following through to the best of my abilities, and there are others, including Capt. Lahr, who feel the same way.
867 posted on 08/31/2002 4:16:46 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
"You continued to smear the late Commander Donaldson and portray him as a opportunistic flake."

Your words, not mine. Donaldson discredited himself with his inept "analysis" of witness reports. He was unqualified by training and experience for the roles he attempted to assume of [1] expertly interviewing the witnesses, and [2] expertly analyzing the witness reports.

inept - Bungling or clumsy; incompetent

expert - A person with a high degree of skill in and knowledge of a certain subject.

You continued to portray those of us that seek the truth in this matter as "vigilante Storm Troopers", "Tinfoil hats", and various other derogotory terms."


868 posted on 09/01/2002 10:21:54 AM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Your words, not mine.

That is the image you paint of him with your attacks upon his reputation. Easy to attack a dead man, isn't it Asmodeus..

Donaldson discredited himself with his inept "analysis" of witness reports.

Your assertion that Commander Donaldson is "inept" in his analysis is without merit, as you have not proven yourself an expert in anything. You CLAIM to be an expert, but refuse to explain why we should believe that. And for you to say that Commander Donaldson has "discredited" himself is a furthur indication that you have no sense of shame..

He was unqualified by training and experience for the roles he attempted to assume of [1] expertly interviewing the witnesses, and [2] expertly analyzing the witness reports.

He has performed triangulations of the witness reports, along with analysis of the trajectories of what they saw. You haven't performed ANY analysis in any true sense, but have simply disparaged the witnesses.

His experience in aviation accident investigations gives him the ability to analyze witness reports in relation to that accident.

You demonstrate no such experience, thus your proclamations of expertise are highly questionable. The witness statements speak for themselves, and you apparently have a problem with what those statements say.

869 posted on 09/01/2002 2:18:04 PM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
Hmmmm, it looks like the courts agree with my opinion of Lahr's lawsuit. Or maybe they are part of the coverup too.
By the way, does anyone still participating in this thread really believe that anyone reads the multiple page posts bogging down this thread? You've got to be kidding me. Some of them must be 10 full pages of cut-n-paste. And they are coming from both sides, so no claims about anyone trying to bury the thread.
870 posted on 09/01/2002 4:54:52 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
By the way John, you started a separate thread anytime there was any news about Lahr, until the courts dismissed his lawsuit. Isn't that threadworthy?
871 posted on 09/01/2002 4:57:13 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
The dismissal of Lahr's lawsuit was based on a technicality, and has NOTHING to do with the merits of the claim.

I work with this type of thing all day long, it's basically meaningless. Furthermore it was dismissed without prejudice, meaning Lahr can and has refiled.

Don't worry about another thread, my sarcastic friend....there will be plenty more.
872 posted on 09/01/2002 7:33:01 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: All
New article on TWA800 is posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/743089/posts
873 posted on 09/01/2002 7:48:39 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

Comment #874 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnFiorentino; Rokke
"The dismissal of Lahr's lawsuit was based on a technicality, and has NOTHING to do with the merits of the claim. I work with this type of thing all day long, it's basically meaningless. Furthermore it was dismissed without prejudice, meaning Lahr can and has refiled.

Ray Lahr's lawsuit has been refiled?

http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/dismissal.gif

http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/new-foia-1.gif

http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/new-foia-2.gif

http://twa800.com/lahr/refile/receipt.gif

875 posted on 09/01/2002 8:31:06 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
The SSS Legal Lexicon On


* Dismissal Without Prejudice *




DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - When a case is dismissed but the plaintiff is allowed to bring a new suit on the same claim.



876 posted on 09/01/2002 8:55:25 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Dammit Asmodeus, stop nitpicking. A "careful reading" of Lahr's FOIA request will clearly reveal that not only has he refiled his lawsuit, but that he has also revealed the chemical composition of chemtrails, and has rewritten all of Newton's laws. If you weren't so blinded by your government shill paycheck, those "facts" would be clearly obvious to you. This info has been out there since July 31st? Why has this been covered up for so long?
877 posted on 09/01/2002 9:03:43 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
For those who understand the MO of Asmodeus and Rokke, no explanation is necessary.......for those who don't, no explanation will suffice.
878 posted on 09/01/2002 9:11:50 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
Well, I can't say I didn't ask for that. Ask (for a new thread) and ye shall recieve. It doesn't look like your new thread is getting a very good reception though. I once had a friend who printed the name "Peter Penucki" on all his books, luggage tags, clothes, etc. Peter Penucki was of Lithuanian descent and ruler of the dark side of the moon. It was a running joke started by his (my friend's) older brothers. Good luck finding the real Peter Penucki.
Now, since you have time to start new threads, why don't you start one titled "Lahr's Lawsuit Dismissed (without prejudice)". Of course, you may want to leave out that little tidbit about him refiling the lawsuit until he does.
879 posted on 09/01/2002 9:13:18 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
And for those who have any doubt that JohnFiorentino has a habit of making things up, perhaps you can ask him for his sources indicating Lahr has refiled his lawsuit against the NTSB.
880 posted on 09/01/2002 9:15:20 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 981-990 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson