Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morris: Clinton False on Corporate Reform Blame Claim
NEWSMAX ^ | 7/25/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 07/25/2002 9:42:22 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

Ex-president Bill Clinton was flat-out wrong on Wednesday when he blamed Republicans for blocking his attempts to implement corporate reforms that might have prevented the recent stock market slide, his former top political advisor Dick Morris tells NewsMax.com exclusively.

While touring the site of his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., Clinton told the New York Times, "Arthur Levitt, my Securities and Exchange commissioner, tried to stop the Enron accounting issues — using the same accounting company being consultant and accountant — and the Republicans stopped it."

Later Clinton tried to claim that Republicans had fought Mr. Levitt's effort, "and (Bush SEC Commissioner) Harvey Pitt was the leader trying to stop us from ending those kind of abuses. That is a matter of record."

But ex-Clinton advisor Dick Morris reveals that the former First Prevaricator is up to his old tricks again.

"This attempt by Clinton to blame the Republicans for the override of his veto of the securities bill is totally phony," he told NewsMax Thursday. "It was Democratic Senator and Democratic National Committee Chairman Chris Dodd of Connecticut who led the effort to override Clinton's veto."

In fact, said Morris, without Dodd's efforts to round Democratic support for the bill, Clinton's veto would have been sustained.

The former White House political advisor said the legislation Clinton vetoed proposed sheltering accountants and other professionals from lawsuits for corporate fraud.

Morris said the bill "created a 'safe harbor' where over-estimates of future profitability would not be grounds for lawsuits by stockholders, provided certain boiler plate language was added."

Under the law passed by Dodd and his fellow Democrats over Clinton's veto, "accountants and other professionals like lawyers could only be assessed for their 'proportionate liability for the fraud,' rather than be 'jointly and severally' held liable for the entire fraud," he said.

"The effect was to shelter firms like Arthur Andersen from liability for the entire Enron scandal and to limit the firm's liability to just a portion of the fraud (leaving investors without recourse because Enron is bankrupt)," Morris explained.

"Arthur Andersen bought Dodd's support (and that of Republican Phil Gramm of Texas) by making them the two largest recipients of Andersen and accounting industry campaign contributions in the US Senate. Dodd paid back that support by the override of Clinton's veto," the former White House insider said.

In fact, newspaper reports at that time back up Morris' account in spades.

"Dodd Gets Senate to Override Veto of Securities Reform Bill," was the headline on the December 1995 Hartford Courant story detailing Democrat efforts to shield the corporate buccaneers.

"The Senate voted, 68-30 Friday to override a President Clinton veto for the first time in his three year old presidency," the paper said, "with old Clinton friend and Democratic Party Chairman Christopher J. Dodd leading the charge. As a result, consumers will find many changes in how they can legally confront and seek restitution from unscrupulous securities firms."

The Courant even quoted Dodd taking credit for loosening the regulations Clinton wanted to keep in place. "I have great respect for the president of the United States," he said at the time. "And I know that when he calls people, it can be very persuasive, but I called everybody too."

In fact, Morris himself detailed Dodd's role in blocking the reforms in his own New York Post column earlier this year.

"Dodd's connections with Arthur Andersen and his vigorous efforts on their behalf are proving a bit of an embarrassment to Democrats bent on pinning the Enron Scandal on Bush and the Republicans," he wrote at the time.

Morris may not the only one who saw through the ex-president's bogus attempt to shift blame to the GOP.

The story by New York Times reporter David Halbfinger covering the erroneous Clinton claims first appeared on the Times' Web site late Wednesday. But a totally different report on Clinton's Little Rock visit, where Halbfinger dropped the incendiary quotes, appeared in the newspaper's print edition Thursday morning.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; corporatereform; lies

1 posted on 07/25/2002 9:42:22 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
CLINTON. I'll tell you what, it would be extremely valuable if they ever do run anybody by me, you know. If they ever get anybody to do this, just to have, like I told you before when I called you, is to have an on-file affidavit explaining that, you know, you were approached by a Republican and asked to do that.

FLOWERS. Mm hmm. Well....

2 posted on 07/25/2002 9:53:23 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple
The story by New York Times reporter David Halbfinger covering the erroneous Clinton claims first appeared on the Times' Web site late Wednesday. But a totally different report on Clinton's Little Rock visit, where Halbfinger dropped the incendiary quotes, appeared in the newspaper's print edition Thursday morning.

FYI...

3 posted on 07/25/2002 9:55:53 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
With the unreasonable p/e ratios, the market was going to slide anyway. Bill Clinton and Alan Greenspan should have known this if they had any judgement. Clinton contributed by his reckless disregard for the law and ethics. It will take quite some time for the moral decline to reverse that Bill Clinton set in motion.
4 posted on 07/25/2002 9:58:00 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
William Jefferson Clinton lying? Say it ain't so......
5 posted on 07/25/2002 10:01:49 AM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
Gotta be Page One.
6 posted on 07/25/2002 10:03:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I wonder if the truth will come out about who was actually running the country, while Slick Willie was busy chasing skirts?
7 posted on 07/25/2002 10:07:56 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Of course, Xlintoon will not let truth be a barrier to his "rewrite of history".

Dan Burton was being generous when he called X42 a SCUMBAG!!!

8 posted on 07/25/2002 10:10:14 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"This attempt by Clinton to blame the Republicans for the override of his veto of the securities bill is totally phony," . . .

This is a shock, as BillyBob has always demonstrated such integrity.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

9 posted on 07/25/2002 10:10:42 AM PDT by mikeb704
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Wait a minute! I thought there wasn't any underhandedness of any kind during Bubba's eight years. According to what we have been told, all this began the very second Bush plopped his Texas boots up on the desk in the Oval Office. Before that, everyone in the business community was on a hill, singing about teaching the world to sing, and buying them a Coke.

So which is it?

10 posted on 07/25/2002 10:23:30 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
That's a silly view. I really don't think powerful but corrupt execs made decisions to steal millions because Clinton was getting a knobber. They could care less. Crooks are crooks, and given an opportunity to steal, and told the cops are taken off, will do so. It is more relevant that the dems led the fight to trash the stock cops, while pretending they didn't. That is where the focus should lie.
11 posted on 07/25/2002 10:37:04 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Ten Million Dollar Senator [Dodd]
12 posted on 07/25/2002 10:42:21 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
How "ethical" for the NYT's--NOT!!! The only thing that the sheeple will remember is the original "thought," er LIE that Clinton stated thanks to numerous headlines and commentary by many other liberal media outlets right after he said it. (Oh, and DRUDGE had it going, too...)

Clinton sure takes his cues from Hitler who claimed that if the LIE was big enough and said enough, people would begin to believe it. I despise Clinton and the liberals who still cover his pathetic, LYING behind.

13 posted on 07/25/2002 10:47:51 AM PDT by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggerjohn
One word, "campaignfinancereform".
14 posted on 07/25/2002 10:48:50 AM PDT by harrym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bloggerjohn
Hey Joe LIEberman....we want to hear from Barry Barbash and Robert Rubin...BOTH were in the SEC during Clinton's reign and BOTH are up to their eyebrows in the ENRON debacle!
15 posted on 07/25/2002 10:52:42 AM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar, ............
16 posted on 07/25/2002 10:55:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
"Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar,
Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar,
Klintoon is a known liar, Klintoon is a known liar,
"

Klintoon is a proven liar. The distinction is important.

17 posted on 07/25/2002 11:35:08 AM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The Senate voted, 68-30 Friday to override a President Clinton veto for the first time in his three year old presidency,"

Good Grief ! This guys lies when there is no need to.
All he had to do was say he tried and congress override him !..and it would be the truth.
Instead he blames the Republicans for overriding him.
18 posted on 07/25/2002 11:35:32 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson