Posted on 07/24/2002 8:50:13 AM PDT by toenail
Congressman Ron Paul
U.S. House of Representatives
July 23, 2002
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY- WHO NEEDS IT?
Mr. Speaker, the Department of Homeland Security, who needs it? Mr. Speaker, everyone agrees the 9-11 tragedy confirmed a problem that exists in our domestic security and dramatized our vulnerability to outside attacks. Most agree that the existing bureaucracy was inept. The CIA, the FBI, the INS, and Customs failed to protect us.
It was not a lack of information that caused this failure; they had plenty. But they filed to analyze, communicate, and use the information to our advantage.
The flawed foreign policy of interventionism that we have followed for decades significantly contributed to the attacks. Warnings had been sounded by the more astute that our meddling in the affairs of others would come to no good. This resulted in our inability to defend our own cities, while spending hundreds of billions of dollars providing more defense for others than for ourselves. In the aftermath, we were even forced to ask other countries to patrol our airways to provide security for us.
A clear understanding of private property and an owner's responsibility to protect it has been seriously undermined. This was especially true for the airline industry. The benefit of gun ownership and second amendment protections were prohibited. The government was given the responsibility for airline safety through FAA rules and regulations, and it failed miserably.
The solution now being proposed is a giant new federal department, and it is the only solution we are being offered, and one which I am certain will lead to tens of billions of dollars of new spending.
What is being done about the lack of emphasis on private property ownership? The security services are federalized. The airlines are bailed out and given guaranteed insurance against all threats. We have made the airline industry a public utility that gets to keep its profits and pass on its losses to the taxpayers, like Amtrak and the post office. Instead of more ownership responsibility, we get more government controls.
Is the first amendment revitalized, and are owners permitted to defend their property, their passengers, and personnel? No, no hint of it, unless you are El Al airlines, which enjoys this right, while no others do.
Has anything been done to limit immigration from countries placed on the terrorist list? Hardly. Have we done anything to slow up immigration of individuals with Saudi passports? No, oil is too important to offend the Saudis.
Yet, we have done plenty to undermine the liberties and privacy of all Americans through legislation such as the PATRIOT Act. A program is being planned to use millions of Americans to spy on their neighbors, an idea appropriate for a totalitarian society. Regardless of any assurances, we all know that the national ID card will soon be instituted.
Who believes for a moment that the military will not be used to enforce civil law in the near future? Posse comitatus will be repealed by executive order or by law, and liberty, the Constitution, and the republic will suffer another major setback.
Unfortunately, foreign policy will not change, and those who suggest that it be strictly designed for American security will be shouted down for their lack of patriotism. Instead, war fever will build until the warmongers get their wish and we march on Baghdad, making us even a greater target of those who despise us for our bellicose control of the world.
A new department is hardly what we need. That is more of the same, and will surely not solve our problems. It will, however, further undermine our liberties and hasten the day of our national bankruptcy.
A common sense improvement to homeland security would allow the DOD to provide protection, not a huge, new, militarized domestic department. We need to bring our troops home, including our Coast Guard; close down the base in Saudi Arabia; stop expanding our presence in the Muslim portion of the former Soviet Union; and stop taking sides in the long, ongoing war in the Middle East.
If we did these few things, we would provide a lot more security and protect our liberties a lot better than any new department ever will, and it will cost a lot less.
Yes. Thanks to an intrepid reporter from National Review Online
A program is being planned to use millions of Americans to spy on their neighbors, an idea appropriate for a totalitarian society.
Yeah, and Hitler built the Autobahn, should we tear up all US highways, too?
Regardless of any assurances, we all know that the national ID card will soon be instituted.
Really? We know this? How prescient of us!
Who believes for a moment that the military will not be used to enforce civil law in the near future?
Gee, Ron, you should write science fiction.
Posse comitatus will be repealed by executive order or by law,
It will? What will the lottery numbers be tomorrow, Ron?
Instead, war fever will build until the warmongers get their wish and we march on Baghdad, making us even a greater target of those who despise us for our bellicose control of the world.
And now we go from simple arrogance to downright stupidity. What are we supposed to do? Sit and cower behind our chairs with our eyes shut and our bodies curled into a fetal position and hope -- against hope -- that the big bad meanies will just leave us alone?
A new department is hardly what we need.
You know, I would think a libertarian would be for the streamlining of government instead of a host of alphabet-soup agencies with overlapping jurisdictions and inefficient bureaucracies. Ron Paul against government streamlining. Who woulda thought?
A common sense improvement to homeland security would allow the DOD to provide protection,
Uh, the DoD is the military. You know, the ones who are going to lead us into an apocolyptic nightmare when they start enforcing civil law.
Ron Paul, we hardly knew ye. Fortunately, you're doing a very fine parody of yourself.
And if you really think an entity that controls both the guns and the money can be reformed or made more efficient, I have some waterfront property in Florida to sell you.
As I suggested to someone else today, you should hold your breath for all the federal government layoffs once the agencies are consolidated into the DHS. Really. It's gonna happen.
That's a lie, in Tom Ridge's case. Keep that knee from jerking and check out what Ridge actually said. You still might not like it, but it's not what you attributed to him.
Besides, I oppose changing the PCA except where WMDs are involved but lest we not forget that the republic survived 89 years before the PCA and it was only enacted in order to end Reconstruction.
Regardless, I'm not going to play Turkey Lurkey to Ron Paul's Chicken Little.
Time to give up, then! Why bother? Throw in the towel! Bring plenty of canned food to the Fallout Shelter, ma!
I have some waterfront property in Florida to sell you.
Uh, I don't think you want to say "Florida".
OK, screen names are fun and all, but sometimes we're forced to call in the guys with the white coats.
Trust me, it's a lonely role on the libertarian threads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.