Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The cure for homosexuality: solution that brought him out of 'gay' life
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, July 23, 2002 | Stephen Bennett

Posted on 07/23/2002 2:04:07 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Kevin Curry
It is wonderful that the author of this piece escaped a lie and found Life.

That can happen for you too if you seek forgiveness for your sins.

41 posted on 07/23/2002 11:51:09 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Emmylou
How delightful to be taken at one's word. I thank you for your civility.
43 posted on 07/23/2002 11:56:53 AM PDT by Fethiye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
You didn't hear about the pursuit of happiness? It's really sad.
44 posted on 07/23/2002 11:58:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2

46 posted on 07/23/2002 12:00:34 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
I'm not answering your pedophile-baiting question. I'm not wasting my time arguing with someone who doesn't have the moral clarity to see the difference between consenting adults and child molestation.

Except that child molesters claim to HAVE consent. To them, it is a normal consequence of their sexual orientation.

47 posted on 07/23/2002 12:00:58 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What about those who left their homosexuality behind via Krishna or Buddha? Are they any less repentant than those who found their way through Jesus?
48 posted on 07/23/2002 12:04:35 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
What about those who left their homosexuality behind via Krishna or Buddha? Are they any less repentant than those who found their way through Jesus?

Know any that we can ask ?????

49 posted on 07/23/2002 12:10:38 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Quester
Not that I am aware of.
51 posted on 07/23/2002 12:13:09 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Emmylou
a child cannot give consent

That's not what the pedophiles say. They say it is a normal, consensual relationship between two people and no one is being harmed.

Surely you don't think we should be suspicious of some behavior when people say their seemingly abnormal behavior is presented as "normal". And surely you don't think that when someone is harmed by a type of behavior that we should automatically suspect that the behavior is wrong. Heaven forbid.

53 posted on 07/23/2002 12:39:43 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
Whatever happened to the pursuit of happiness?

What about the pursuit of happiness for those who practice incest, bestiality, and pedophilia? What about their needs? Why do you protect one perversion over another?

54 posted on 07/23/2002 12:42:30 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
Are you saying that two adults of the same sex can't consent?

I would say that in some states, laws were in effect for over a century that made acts of sodomy against the law because the general population believed it was wrong. There were even laws enacted AND enforced to combat adultery and fornication. Now you can say one of two things. Either the Founding Fathers, whose peers passed these laws, were not as 'enlightened' as folks have been over the past four decades OR that the morality in this nation has fallen to such a low that doing whatever you want is more important than following the precepts of the Constitution. Surely you're not going to suggest that the Founders of this nation established such Amendments as the 1st, 9th, and 10th, public or private, to condone and approve of the actions of homosexuals are you?

55 posted on 07/23/2002 12:43:10 PM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I would say that in some states, laws were in effect for over a century that made acts of sodomy against the law because the general population believed it was wrong. There were even laws enacted AND enforced to combat adultery and fornication. Now you can say one of two things. Either the Founding Fathers, whose peers passed these laws, were not as 'enlightened' as folks have been over the past four decades OR that the morality in this nation has fallen to such a low that doing whatever you want is more important than following the precepts of the Constitution. Surely you're not going to suggest that the Founders of this nation established such Amendments as the 1st, 9th, and 10th, public or private, to condone and approve of the actions of homosexuals are you?

Some states also had laws banning interracial relationships for centuries, for the same reasons? Should those be banned as well or should everyone stay out of each others business and bedrooms?

56 posted on 07/23/2002 12:52:27 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
Homosexuality isn't defined by law. They brought political pressure to bear for legalization their turpitude.

Pedophiles are seeking the same status.

They ARE morally equivalent.
57 posted on 07/23/2002 12:52:56 PM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
"Our laws differentiate between consenting adults (ok) and adults and children (not okay)."

Thomas Jefferson had a different take on the notion of "consenting adults" and the standing of sodomists before the law.

"Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro' the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least."

Thomas Jefferson, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments, 1778
Papers 2:492--504

In addition, The United States Supreme Court has ruled that sodomy laws are not unconstitutional.

58 posted on 07/23/2002 12:57:57 PM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou
a child cannot give consent

That’s a lie and part of the deceit used to justify homosexuality. CONSENT is measured by mental capacity and legal mental capacity is measured by IQ. Many children have the minimum legal IQ for an emancipated individual, those are facts. Just because you keep repeating “children can’t consent” over and over won't make it true no matter how much you want it to be so. Moral clarity for you extends only to the practice of certain perversions; too bad you’re a hypocrite. Why don’t you prove children can’t consent instead of using it as a straw man?

59 posted on 07/23/2002 12:58:00 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson