Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Westerfield's trial had been in recess since July 11 so the judge could take a previously scheduled vacation.
Westerfield, 50, lived two doors from Danielle, who vanished after her father put her to bed the night of Feb. 1. Searchers found the girl's nude body on Feb. 27 along a rural roadside east of San Diego.
A forensic entomologist, testifying Monday for the defense, said Danielle's body could not have been dumped at the roadside before Feb. 12, according to his analysis of flies and larvae collected during an autopsy. The blow flies that were found on the body typically descend on a cadaver shortly after death, but it can take longer in cooler temperatures, entomologist Neal Haskell said. Based on his analysis of the temperatures in the area at the time, Haskell (pictured, right) put "the time of colonization" likely at Feb. 14 and no earlier than Feb. 12.
Prosecutors challenged the defense's weather data.
Haskell's testimony puts the time the body may have been dumped several days earlier than suggested by a previous defense witness, entomologist David Faulkner. The defense has seized upon the time of death, which could not be precisely determined, to suggest that the body was dumped at a time when Westerfield was under constant police surveillance.
Westerfield was put under observation soon after Danielle disappeared, according to police testimony. He was arrested on Feb. 22.
During Haskell's testimony about insects devouring Danielle's body, the girl's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, stared at the floor as they sat in the back row of the courtroom. It is the first time that Damon van Dam has been in court since Judge William Mudd banned him from the proceedings almost a month ago as a security risk. Mudd restored his trial privileges just before going on vacation.
Lawyers for Westerfield have said they expect to offer two to three more days of testimony.
(07-22-2002) - David Westerfield's trial resumed Monday after an 11-day break with his attorneys again focusing on entomological evidence in an effort to show he was not the one who put Danielle van Dam's body where it was found.
Forensic entomologist Neal Haskell testified that blow flies did not colonize the body of the 7-year-old girl until at least Feb. 12 -- a time when Westerfield was under constant police surveillance.
"I concluded the time of colonization for the decedent would have been the 14th of February to the 20th of February," said Haskell, adding that the colonization could have occurred on the 12th or 13th in extreme cases.
Danielle van Dam's body was discovered beside a road east of El Cajon Feb. 27, five days after Westerfield's arrest.
The defense says Westerfield was under tight police surveillance beginning Feb. 5, making it physically impossible for him to have placed the body there.
Before the break in the trial, the defense called to the stand forensic entomologist David Faulkner, who testified that the victim's body was invaded by insects only 10-12 days before it was discovered.
The defense argues that the testimony on when the insect-invasion occurred proves Westerfield was not the killer because he was under constant police surveillance from Feb. 5 up to his arrest Feb. 22.
Under cross-examination by prosecutor Jeff Dusek, Haskell said he worked under the assumption that Danielle van Dam was placed in Dehesa at the time of her death -- or was killed there.
When Dusek suggested the body may have been transported around the desert in a motorhome for 24-36 hours, Haskell agreed decomposition and the drying effects of mummification could have been enhanced, but not enough to inhibit insect activity.
Dusek also attacked temperature data Haskell used to form his conclusion. Temperatures, according to courtroom testimony, could affect the speed of decomposition of a body and the speed of insect activity.
Haskell said he used temperatures taken from the National Weather Service at Brown Field on Otay Mesa. The airfield is more than 15 miles from where the body was discovered.
Haskell told the court he "was comfortable" using the Brown Field data because the elevation was approximately the same as the recovery site.
Westerfield, 50, is charged with murder, kidnapping and misdemeanor possession of child pornography. He could face the death penalty if convicted on the felony counts.
The last time testimony was heard in the trial was July 10, before Superior Court Judge William Mudd took a long-planned vacation with the approval of attorneys on both sides.
FWIW.
About the only thing it precludes, IF THE JURY ACCEPTS THE DEFENSE WITNESS TESTIMONY (and that is a big if, after the lawyer had to apologize to the jury for "inadvertently" misleading them), is Westerfield dumping the body.
The other evidence is kinda tough to explain away, though.
Here is video link, won't work until after they are done with afternoon break.Click here, then pick LIVE FEED OF TRIAL<.a>
Well, those that ARE listening to the trial live (like me) have the complete opposite opinion. That is that DUSEK is a big bust. He keeps getting mad, and yelling, and the judge just called a break to (as someone else so aptly suggested) to let him pull his panties out of his crack.
So, who ya gonna believe?????
(Also)See GLOSSARY: WILD BUG CHASE
Well, that's quite a generalization. I am listening to the trial live. And listening only today :(
I presume posters here make their own conclusion and if a pundit or observer happens to agree with one or the other, fine. But to constantly say those who differ with the pro-Westies are basing their opinion on talking-heads is false.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.