We were duped about Okla. bombing

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | Monday, July 15, 2002 | Ralph R. Reiland

[Jean S]

Shortly after the explosion at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, an "all points bulletin" went out over the Oklahoma City police radio band alerting law enforcement officers to be on the lookout for a "late model, almost new, Chevrolet, full-size pickup, brown in color with tinted windows and a smoke-colored bug deflector on the front."

[spycatcher]

Who is this Carville-schooled "Dave S" that goes psycho over a simple opinion piece that he can't even refute a portion of? I wonder if he sees how silly he appears by attacking the source and not refuting a single fact? I doubt it. People who go the tired ad hominem route usually don't even know what it means.

[Jean S]

Yeah, and we didn't land on the moon either.Right? Give it a rest. You're an embarrassment.

Thanks, your opinion means so much to me.

[glorygirl]

"My heritage is Swedish you moron. Guess you didnt catch many spys in your days. Maybe you were working both sides."

Look who's calling who a moron. Gee,and I thought it was spelled "spies."

[Dave S]

Who the hell is "Sun Yat Moon" you illiterate bozo

You think Im going to waste my time looking up correct spelling of a kook cult leader who owns the Washington Times and Insight Magazine among others. You seem to have had no trouble knowing who I was referring to.

Im sure that you would be so open minded about the ownership if the Washington Post was owned the former head of the US Communist Party or worse yet some Mullah from Tehran.

[Dave S]

I already posted who the guy was. You ever hear of him or his school? I could probably teach economics at that rinky dink school.

Just because you get published,doesnt mean you know anything. Look at all the crap that comes out of academia annually.

[DouglasKC]

It seems there is a US government policy to either (when possible) pretend terrorist acts are accidents or (when it's obviously terrorism but not quite so obvious who the perpetrators are) create fairy tale like stories that deny the true terrorists credit. It's like Americans can't be trusted to know the truth.

I agree with this. The twin towers and the pentagon were the result of years of denial by the U.S. Government, especially Clinton. The terrorists finally said "We're going to terrorize the United States and nobody will be able to deny it was us."

[Jean S]

Oops, silly me, I forgot to close my tags.
< /sarcasm >

[Dave S]

I wonder if he sees how silly he appears by attacking the source and not refuting a single fact?

What facts. Show me what facts you are talking about and why you know to a certainty (100%) that they are true. Someone saying it doesnt make it true.

[glorygirl]

"You think Im going to waste my time looking up correct spelling of a kook cult leader who owns the Washington Times and Insight Magazine among others. You seem to have had no trouble knowing who I was referring to."

Yes, of course, who wants to waste time looking up the facts, especially when it comes to simple things like spelling and punctuation?

It's okay to make honest mistakes, but please leave us alone, Dave S. Remember that hundreds of people lost loved ones in the OKC bombing, that many read these threads and are honestly seeking answers to their questions. It is not a subject to be taken lightly. And the government's handling of the case shouldn't be taken lightly, either.

This is not a place to goof around. Many people have spent years investigating this,and don't appreciate disruptors.

[Betty Jo]

I keep searching and I keep asking:

Where is any first source,origional source,straight from ".gov" documentation of Bodansky warning,or knowledge of ME's at Murrah?

There is something not quite right about everyone quoting Bodansky,but no one being able to provide "origional source".

McCollum and Rhorbacher play into this.

Help!

[COB1]

Hey, nude dude!
I see you've been on FR a looooong time..........let's see, hummmmmm.....about 23 days to be exact.
Now you're going to give us all your insight into our President's thought pattern, huh?
Let me clue you in, clueless dude:
George W. IS a Texan!
Like a typical Texan, what George W. is doing is from the heart, and his political standing makes not one whoop in hell to him when measured against the welfare of this country.
You would do well to shut up, read and learn.

[Clara Lou]

Given the claims in this article that there was plenty of intelligence gathered about an impending attack and that the Marshall's Service was specifically being targeted for their 'trespas' on the Quran there would be no need to take credit for it. The intended targets, the Marshall's Service and the U.S. Gov., knew who did it.
I am certainly no expert, so I'm just going to say that I don't find the above credible. To be perfectly honest, it sounds utterly ridiculous.

[Dave S]

It is not a subject to be taken lightly. And the government's handling of the case shouldn't be taken lightly, either.

Seems that if the evidence was so convincing the Oklahoma state prosecution of Nichols would love to introduce these "facts" as then Nichols would be King Pin and not just a flunky with a poor choice of friends.

This is not a place to goof around. Many people have spent years investigating this,and don't appreciate disruptors.

I dont appreciate people who parade their ignorance and make all conservatives look like Kooks or whatever. At least you havent tried to tie Abu Sayef and Nichols to the Illuminatti or the Bilderbergers.

[spycatcher]

What facts. Show me what facts you are talking about and why you know to a certainty (100%) that they are true. Someone saying it doesnt make it true.

I'm sorry I didn't realize you we're learning impaired. Please accept my apologies. First go to the dictionary and look up what a fact is.

Then after a few days when you understand that (ask mom or dad for help in using the dictionary if you need to) came back here and refer to any article posted on the thread, looking for stated facts. Once you have one then try to refute that fact. It's fun! Just like hide and seek! Good luck!

P.S. whining and crying about facts you may or may not even see or understand while attacking the author doesn't make the facts untrue.

[Keith in Iowa]

I think it was the freemòòsers.

The radical Cheese fringe...

[spycatcher]

I dont appreciate people who parade their ignorance and make all conservatives look like Kooks or whatever.

With such a low self-image you may want to consider leaving Free Republic then. We don't like people like you either.

[Plummz]

The Village.

[spycatcher]

In case you don't understand humor either, that was a joke.

We really love nonsensical learning-impaired disruptors like you /sarcasm

[Dave S]

According to your own definition, a fact is "Knowledge or information based on real occurrences." What evidence do you have for any of these facts. I see all kinds of warnings that were supposed to have been issued immediately before hand, do we see any documents that have been authenticated? Any documents? Or just some anonymous person saying that some other unknown person said such and such.

What direct knowledge do you have about any of the connections in the Phillipines? What direct knowledge do you have that Nichols didnt go there looking for mail order brides? He certainly came back from there once or twice with a Phillipine bride or were they just secret Abu Sayef agents? The gist of that article suggest that Nicols was a lot more involved in the bombing than originally believed. I would think if all this was true, the state government would love to bring it out in court in order to make sure Nichols gets death sentence. But no it must be someone like the Cigarette Smoking Man who is preventing it from coming to light. Sure. Im out of here. Enjoy your fantasies.

[Victoria Delsoul]

Thanks for the info.