Replies

Given the claims in this article that there was plenty of intelligence gathered about an impending attack and that the Marshall's Service was specifically being targeted for their 'trespas' on the Quran there would be no need to take credit for it. The intended targets, the Marshall's Service and the U.S. Gov., knew who did it.
I am certainly no expert, so I'm just going to say that I don't find the above credible. To be perfectly honest, it sounds utterly ridiculous.

TE: The intended targets, the Marshall's Service and the U.S. Gov., knew who did it.

CL: I am certainly no expert, so I'm just going to say that I don't find the above credible. To be perfectly honest, it sounds utterly ridiculous

Really? You find it ridiculous that after numerous warnings sent to the U.S. and intelligence reports confirming an impending attack that they might know who did it? At least who possibly or probably did it? OK. You inquired as to reasons the perps didn't claim credit. I gave you a few. If you don't like 'em come up with a reason you find more plausible.

Personally I don't think ME terrorists did it and that's why they didn't claim credit. Too much credible evidence points to the U.S. Gov. having done it.