[Daniel] Pipes' Dreams

Philadelphia City Paper ^ | July 18, 2002 | Daniel Brook

[NetValue]

Only Pipes has had it correct from the beginning. America better listen to this man. The worst threat we have to contend with lies ahead where the Islamics intend to use the political process to make America into an Islamic government. Constitutionally, they are free to do so.

[Utah Girl]

Pipe ping for you.

[nofriendofbills]

To his supporters, Pipes looks like a biblical prophet, returning bearded and gaunt-cheeked from the desert to tell a lax and overindulgent people the disturbing truths they don't want to hear.

And like all real prophets he'll be ignored

And the people will pay for it.

[denydenydeny]

Indexing.

[The Energizer]

I forgot how to bookmark an article. Where is this function now located? Thanks!

[A. Pole]

"Whatever the majority of Muslim Americans may believe, most of the organized Muslim community" agrees with the goal of building an Islamic state in America. "To put it another way, the major Muslim organizations in this country are in the hands of extremists."

"EXTREMISTS"?! This is the mainline Muslim doctrine that the WHOLE world is to be conquered and forced into submission. All people had to be pressured to convert and those who leave Islam has to be executed (yes, it is one way path)

[kaylar]

Very top, below body of text and above reply # 1, next to 'report abuse'.

[JimSEA]

Bump! And for emphasis:

Pipes singled out four mistakes by the government: viewing terrorist attacks as crimes, not acts of war; relying on electronic surveillance rather than human intelligence; not understanding what he called the "hate-America mentality"; and ignoring the terrorist infrastructure inside America.

[MonroeDNA]

This guy has it exactly right.

Wonder how long it will take before our first Islamist here will go ballistic?

[DoctorMichael]

Good article. Thanks.

"Why should we let in people who despise this country?" Pipes asks rhetorically.

...................A statement of such obvious utility and straightforwardness is probably too much for the average congessman or senator to understand.

[aculeus]

Piping for you.

[backhoe]

Jihad! Across the World....

The Web of Terror

[ppaul]

Pipes
ping!

[LonePalm]

Personally, I don't know that I would trust ANY muslim in the US. I would be willing to deport ANY non-US citizen that refuses to publicly forswear the creation of an islamic state in the US.

I would be willing to deport US citizens that advocate the creation of an Islamic state by ANYTHING other than constitutional means.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[TheOtherOne]

BUMP

[Gritty]

Pipes is right on!

One need only listen to these Muslim spokesmen to see through their phony arguments of "we only want peace and justice".

They are a totalitarian 5th column in our midst and are mad at Pipes because he is flushing them out like the lying rats they are!

[Kenny Bunk]

Pipes merely documents what our 16th Century ancestors already knew: there is no place in Christendom for Islam. It has nothing to do with theology.

Christianity long ago evolved a mindset that can manage to co-exist, even up to a point encourage, non-Christian pluralism. There simply is no such latitude in Islam.

The Muslims in this country are simply dissembling as they lie in wait for their opportunity. This 'false face' is even encouraged in the Q'uran as a necessary means to the stated Islamic end of converting or killing non-Muslims.

[TheOtherOne]

I would be willing to deport US citizens that advocate the creation of an Islamic state by ANYTHING other than constitutional means.

WHAT?

I want NO Islamic State under any circumstance! Any attempt to do so is an attempt to subvert the Constitution.

[TheOtherOne]

I would be willing to deport US citizens

I am not sure on the criteria, but I think trying to set up an islamic State qualifies with me. I guess I agree with you, but am not sure what 'consitutional means' means?