Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS NEWS
Fiedor Report On the News #279 ^ | 7-21-02 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 07/20/2002 2:11:31 PM PDT by forest

By: Douglas Lorenz, RLC National Chairman (1)

There have recently been a number of significant changes in the national Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC). Among the more obvious changes, the National Committee picked a new chairman. Of course, most people haven't heard about this recent change yet, and that is largely because, over time, the national RLC has lost contact with some of its state and local activists. Starting now, that is changing.

The most important function of the Republican Liberty Caucus is to build an organization that helps Liberty-minded Republicans get active in politics. Our goal is to encourage Liberty minded folks to band together within their communities and their states to form RLC chapters. Which means, of course, that we need to make tools available to help people build an organization, recruit members, and get involved in their local campaigns. Towards that end, we plan to establish a communication network that will allow RLC members and chapters to discuss their successes and failures so that we can reach a future where success is commonplace.

The National Board of Directors of the Republican Liberty Caucus recognizes that the real work is done at the state and local levels. It is at the state and local levels where individuals work closely with campaigns, getting votes, influencing policy, and getting Liberty minded Republicans elected to office. Our members need to be involved closely and actively with current campaigns, and we will be encouraging some members to run for office themselves whenever possible. From our point of view, all elected political offices are significant because all elected offices can impact on our Liberty. A lot can be accomplished running for a school board or a city council seat. And, let's face it, today's local leaders are often tomorrow's state and national legislators.

Therefore, we must also be actively involved in Republican Party activities at the state and local level. Republican Party policy needs to be influenced by individuals who hold the real Reagan beliefs that "Government is not the solution to our problems, Government is the problem". In some states we actually have individuals who claim to be Republican who are fighting to implement state income taxes and other anti-Liberty laws. We have some of these "Republicans in Name Only" or "RINO's" who see nothing wrong in curtailing the very freedoms that make America great. Simply put, the Republican Liberty Caucus does not think that these individuals should be the standard bearers for the party of Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.

Simply by making it possible for Liberty minded people to get involved, the Republican Liberty Caucus can and should become the standard bearer of the Republican Party. And, that is where the organization of the national Republican Liberty Caucus becomes important.

While the state organizations are best at battling in the trenches and winning individual campaigns, the national organization can sometimes be better at getting recognition for our efforts. The national Board of the Republican Liberty Caucus can reach out to the media in ways that state chapters often cannot. And the national organization can connect with other Republican groups, issue groups and think tanks in ways that would be inefficient for 50 individual state organizations. With such recognition, other groups and individuals will see our quest to have Liberty minded candidates elected to office as a winning cause, and they will be willing to help us at the state level.

The primary goal of the Republican Liberty Caucus is to help Liberty minded candidates -- those who will "support and defend the Constitution of the United States" -- get elected to office. Our secondary goal is to provide a viable organization that will help Liberty minded Republicans join together to succeed in our primary goal.

----

Douglas Lorenz is the National Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus, which was formed in 1990 to promote the principles of free enterprise, limited government and individual liberty within the Republican Party. He can be reached by e-mail at Doug@Lorenz.Net.

-----------------------------

NOTE: The RLC is active in a few States. Most notably are Texas(2), California(3) and Kentucky(4).

According to Scott Jordan, the newly proposed California State Chairman, their chapter is quite active:

"In this election cycle, for example, California's Reagan-style Bill Simon was the come-from-behind landslide winner against the establishment-supported mainstream RINO favorite. This was no surprise to the RLC, which was the first national organization to endorse Simon's campaign -- about a year before the primary! And the RLC worked hard to ensure Simon's nomination, including telephone-bank efforts mounted in the Bay Area(3), which Simon amazingly carried, despite the region's well-known liberalism.

"Under its new leadership, the RLC is coming out swinging to ensure that Liberty principles and Constitutional fidelity prevail in this and future elections. These are the most exciting days yet for the RLC -- check it out."

Texas, of course, has the RLC's first Chairman, Rep. Ron Paul, and other office holders. They already have a slate of candidates ready for this election cycle.

Kentucky RLC helped six out of seven RLC candidates get elected in the last election cycle and is already working on a very impressive slate for this and the next cycle.

-----------------------------

1. http://www.rlc.org

2. http://www.rlctexas.org/

3. http://www.BayAreaRLC.org

4. Mike Moreland at: mrm.bluegill1@insightbb.com

   

 END


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Kentucky; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 1douglaslorenz; 2rlcnatlchrmn; caucus; constitution; mikemoreland; reagan; rino; ronpaullist; scottjordon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: gcruse
"The RLC was a placebo"

Nope. What it is is a start. A trickle of water carved the Grand Canyon, and the steady drip-drip-drip of socialism has corroded the GOP and DemocRat parties alike.

First we stem the flow. Then we rebuild the foundation.

It'll take time, and progress will not be linear. But we will make more of a difference in the GOP than we could possibly do as a third party.
21 posted on 07/20/2002 9:36:44 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
It is a mechanism to draw libertarians away from the Libertarian Party, weakening it. In the meantime, their activity is lost in the "far from liberty oriented" Republican Party.

Lost? Ask Dick Riordan.

What we're doing is political aikido: using the mass and momentum of the GOP to direct it where we want it to go. It's a patient process, requiring steady effort from energetic liberty-minded voters.

I'd love to count you among them someday. We will re-make the Republican Party, and we will improve America.
22 posted on 07/20/2002 9:39:11 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The RLC has even done outreach to fringe libertarians. They sent a representative to the Karl Hess Club to make the libertarian case for Bush in the 2000 Presidential election.

The above article mentions and links to the RLC.

23 posted on 07/20/2002 9:42:13 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
They regularly advertise in Libertarian publications and I have seen them at Libertarian state conventions at times.

True. Read how they sent a rep to the libertarian Karl Hess Club

24 posted on 07/20/2002 9:45:19 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
The RLC may have decent ideas, and they do, but as far as gaining a foothold in the Republican Party is concerned, it just ain't gonna happen. The numbers are too much against us. ...I gave up on the Republicans in '96 and haven't looked back.

Good thing you haven't looked back, because socialism is gainin' on ya, and big-L Libertarianism has gone nowhere. Meanwhile, the RLC is making a difference. "Our guy" offed the Establishment's nominee for the Republican gubernatorial nomination in California; "Our guy" Ron Paul is liberty's only dependable voice in Congress; "Our guys" in Kentucky nabbed eight statewide posts in the last election...

See, the "numbers" you reference don't include the vast body of disaffected potential voters such as yourself. The RLC is a seed, and as it grows it will do so not by converting the Riordanites already in the party but by attracting fresh blood: folks like you, and the "silent majority".

Join up! You can make a difference.
25 posted on 07/20/2002 9:47:45 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Simon is the RLC's guy? But is he a libertarian -- or a conservative?

Doesn't he support the war on drugs, and oppose abortion rights? Doesn't he support US foreign aid, and foreign invervention?

If so, just how "libertarian" is Simon? And how "libertarian" is the RLC?

Ron Paul, yes. But Simon?

26 posted on 07/20/2002 10:37:16 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast; Jim Robinson; one_particular_harbour; Fred Mertz; Doug Fiedor; pocat; ...
["Our guys" in Kentucky nabbed eight statewide posts in the last election....] you said.

Today I attended a local GOP rally in Northern Kentucky.

While looking around the room I saw most of those new liberty minded politicians, (the RLC members in attendance that were elected in the last election).

In the crowded room I observed another phenomonem: There in the hall, I saw three of seven RLC Ky state senators, one of those is running for governor in next year's primary. One RLC member is the President Pro Tem of the Ky Senate.

I also recruited two more RLC members from the Ky House of Reps who have scored at least 80% on Rand Paul's Ky Taxpayers United score card as "Friends of the Taxpayer".

Also in attendance was another RLC member that will compete against the RLC State Senator in the primary for Ky governor 2003. That being a House of Representatives member of wide popular appeal.

Also the last Republican governor (retired), an RLC member, was in attendance, as well as candidates for at least 15 various local offices in the Northern Ky counties who are RLC members.

All of these people are committed libertarian thinkers.

(another side note) The RLC favorite candidate of 2000 for Congress was in attendance today....FReeper Don Bell, the retired Secret Service agent.

What happened to that July 4th digital photo that I sent to you and Doug Fiedor of the four RLC Ky state Senators?

Maybe JimRob can post the picture on this thread, for all to see, our RLC contribution to liberty here in Kentucky.

27 posted on 07/20/2002 11:07:29 PM PDT by the irate magistrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Well... Ron Paul (and I) oppose abortion too, along with many libertarians... the RLC has no official position on it. Simon opposes it too, but notes that as Governor he'd have no influence over the issue.

Simon scores about 90-95% on the issues for me. He'll be the best governor in recent memory in California, and is one the RLC can support enthusiastically and wholeheartedly.
28 posted on 07/20/2002 11:30:26 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: the irate magistrate
Hell of a post! Seems you guys have elected more in KY than the big-L Libertarian Party has in the rest of the country combined. A great example for us to follow in California. Hats off to you!
29 posted on 07/20/2002 11:35:23 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Here (from private email) is a picture of some RLC folks in Kentucky who just happen to be State Senators:

From right to left:

Ernie Harris of Oldham Co.
Dick Roeding of Kenton Co.
Virgil Moore of Grayson Co.
Dan Seum of Jefferson Co.

...The Republican Liberty Caucus ("Liberty is our middle name"): Making a difference, one office at a time!
30 posted on 07/20/2002 11:44:51 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
lol--I have been lurking mainly recently instead of posting, dont have nearly as much free time as I used to but I normally do check FR daily
31 posted on 07/21/2002 12:57:39 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Ron Paul (and I) oppose abortion too, along with many libertarians...

Back in 1988, I attended a Ron Paul fundraiser in California (Ed Clark was there too). When Paul announced his position on abortion, there were gasps in the audience.

32 posted on 07/21/2002 1:10:50 AM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: forest
Right now after watching the Pubbie's in the Senate, led by that stalwart conservative Trent Lott, sign every spending and legislative bill that comes down from Daschle and Kennedy (plus adding their own RINO-laced pork) I'm a little disappointed in the whole damn thing. I don't need a 'pacifier'...........I intend to stay mad!
33 posted on 07/21/2002 5:17:32 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
See Post #33.
34 posted on 07/21/2002 5:22:12 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
I'd love to count you among them someday. We will re-make the Republican Party, and we will improve America.

I have trouble accepting that as a possibility. In addition to the history of the RLC as a powerless sub group within the Republican Party I have the further input of my current environment.

I live in Johnson County, Kansas. Here the Republican Party is paramount but is divided into two groups that literally hate each other more than they do the Dems.

We have one group that is generally conservative and call themselves that. The other group calls themselves Moderate. The position of the moderates would be appropriate for the Democrats anywhere else.

The MODs are for gun control, love to raise taxes, support abortion including public financing-in other words, they are quasi-Democrats.

There are several primary races brewing here that are MODs vs conservatives. Mostly there is no general election opposition so the primary winner is it. (Kind of reminds you of the old south, doesn't it?)

For state legislative seats, there will be precious few elections in November. Just a few challenged by Libertarians and Democrats. All the interest will be at the higher level seats-Govenor, Senator and Congress.

If the RLC is to be useful, they must be here supporting or being part of the conservative faction. The moderate faction is over the top liberal and not moveable. It certainly doesn't seem like a libertarian should be joining the Republican Party hoping to change them when there is already such a battle going on.

35 posted on 07/21/2002 5:52:24 AM PDT by Mike4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
The main body of the RNC is neoconservative,IMO. The Constitution means nothing to them. I can't support the GOP until these pretenders are discarded.
36 posted on 07/21/2002 6:28:20 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: forest
I just bookmarked the link to the Texas RLC! The RNC is so liberal that I quit supporting them long ago. I 0nly vote for candidates that espouse conservative values and only donate money to those that have proven to uphold conservative values. Thanks for the link. Ron Paul is one great American!
37 posted on 07/21/2002 6:50:54 AM PDT by antisocial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the irate magistrate; don bell; Wally Cleaver; SLB; Lion Den Dan; logos
Thanks for your outstanding work, irate one! I think I need to renew my RLC membership this year and you need to twist my arm once in a while to get me away from the computer.
38 posted on 07/21/2002 7:02:07 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Hello everyone...

I'd like to join in this message thread and answer a few questions and concerns.

First, there are people who have become disenchanted with the Republican Party over the lack of commitment to the principles of liberty. To this concern, I have to agree.

If the Republican Party in general were committed to smaller, less intrusive government, then there would be little need for the RLC. If our government believed that protecting individual liberties was more important than using government force to implement personal agendas, then most of us would not feel the concern that motivates us politically.

However, this is not the way the Republican Party is right now.

Many Republicans do believe that it is acceptable to use government force to accomplish "noble goals". Many Republicans do not see taxes as a drain on individual productivity. Many Republicans do find little wrong in exchanging liberties for perceived safety.

This is why we need the RLC.

The Libertarian Party is a failure. No third party has the ability to make a difference from outside the system, at least not at this time. It's foolish and inefficient to try to create a complete political party structure out of the chaos that is the LP. It is, however, possible to force the GOP, at least part of it, to be libertarian.

And that is what we are here for. We have seen that libertarians can be elected to office when they run as Republicans. As this movement grows, we will get more recognition, and more individuals who see that it is possible to win as Republicans will run.

Can we change the Republican Party? I believe so. It is not a quick process to change something that large, and that entrenched, but every day we are winning battles. Already a number of states can point to legislators who are clearly libertarian in ideology, but won as Republicans.

And at some point in the future we will reach that critical mass where there are more of us in the Republican Party than those who are not friends of liberty. That is what we strive for right now.

So, consider this: The Libertarian Party has been around for three decades now, and their idea of success at the national level is to get someone elected to a school board in Nowhere, Idaho. The Republican Liberty Caucus has elected members in state legislatures throughout the country, a number of leaders elected to national office, maintains activists at all levels of the Republican Party, and we've only been around for the past decade.

So, which is more successful, and which is the better tool for restoring liberty?

Douglas Lorenz
National Chairman
Republican Liberty Caucus
39 posted on 07/21/2002 8:53:11 AM PDT by DougLorenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Then help us make a difference!
40 posted on 07/21/2002 8:58:42 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson