Posted on 07/19/2002 4:53:22 PM PDT by rohry
PS:I found the prices in California rather steep there. :^)
NASD - 1,175
S&P - 780
Gold - $330
Silver - $5.15
Which market?
I say DOW 6000-7000.
NASDAQ: 1,050
I say NASDAQ three digits.
S&P: 750
I like your S&P.
Gold: $330
I say Gold $335.
DOW - 7500
NASDAQ - 1220
S&P - 780
Gold - $350
Silver - $5.40
Capitulation is not yet here. There's still some hope left in these bear market rallies so the breakdown will just continue to decline the markets until they are 1/2 of what they are today.
The big question is silver and gold. These markets are highly subject to manipulation. However, their sharp spikes today retraced some but then showed strength, so I think the precious metal markets are due for a breakout. The usual control was not solid on a day when the options expired. If they hit these above forecast levels, they may well go much higher, especially if the breakdown of the equities continues apace.
It's the perfect sales pitch for these uncertain times: How about a chance to make money in the market, but be guaranteed you won't lose a dime?
Mutual-fund companies are racing to offer funds that promise just that. "Have you ever heard of a mutual fund that offers you the unique opportunity to participate in the market's upside potential while enjoying the added benefit of a guarantee of principal -- for five years?" reads the marketing material for ING Principal Protection Funds.
A handful of investments like the ING funds, widely known as guaranteed funds, have been around for years without garnering much attention. But the stock market's collapse is focusing attention on these offerings and bringing new versions of them out of the woodwork.
From a performance standpoint, the funds come out somewhere between stock and bond funds. Since it was launched in October 1999, the ING Classic Principal Protection Fund, for example, is down 0.2%. Meanwhile, the Standard & Poor's 500 index is down 28.8%, the average domestic diversified stock fund is down 14.2%, and the average bond fund is up 16% during the same period, according to Lipper Inc.
Now that's an interesting promise. I wonder who's underwriting this? Who can afford to, realistically? And finally, I wonder what the load on such a fund would be.
Dang. That's the part of the Journal I rarely read. I guess I'll have to do better. :^)
I was really hoping that there was a web site that one could dig this stuff up on (and perhaps there is, but I haven't found it with a quick 'google' search).
S&P 500 720
Nasdaq 999
Gold 400
Silver 7
Oil 35
(I laughed when I heard Dan Rather on the SeeBS evening news tonight make a quip about today's market action: "The closing bell didn't ring today, it tolled...")
anyone have any idea what power producers or oil companies he might be referring to?
or, better still, where one can go to easily research such claims?
Then there's the expense hurdle. The "A" class shares of the Smith Barney Fund costs shareholders 1.95% of their assets every year, and the expenses on the other two classes of shares reduce an investor's earnings by 2.7 percentage points. In contrast, the average fund that is a blend of bonds and stocks carries an expense ratio of 1.28%, according to Morningstar. The difference on these guaranteed funds is that in addition to covering the normal costs of running a fund, 0.75% of a shareholder's investment goes to pay for the insurance policy.
I can't answer that, but I can say that a good bet would be a company that has some good, reliable (coal as a staple) power generation capability. The key is owning "hard" assets, not manipulators of contracts and such as Enron had become. Find the smokestacks (preferably, smokestacks built in the 1980's or newer) and you may find value. Don't underestimate Nukes, but only as a moderately small proportion of assets (say, 20% or less). Don't ignore wires, pipelines, wells, and that kind of stuff either.
Think physical, act financial.
From Letterman last night:
"I bumped into my stockbroker today -- well, I didn't actually bump into him . . . I broke his fall."
Anyone else have market humor? It is a good stress reliever.
Richard W.
Letterman: "I just got a call from Martha Stewart today. She wanted me to pass along to all of you that you can now take her stock certificates.... and make adorable little placemats out of them."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.