Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIPS - Bushwhacking Freedom
RazorMouth.com ^ | July 18, 2002 | John W. Whitehead

Posted on 07/18/2002 11:21:23 AM PDT by chunjay

Is operation TIPS part of a plan to defend our homeland—or destroy it?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There ought to be limits to freedom." —George W. Bush, May 21, 1999 "I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in—and the West in general—into an unbearable hell and a choking life." —Osama bin Laden, Oct. 21, 2001

When George W. Bush made his astonishing remark about limiting freedom, he was referring to his desire to shut down a parody website that had been giving him grief. But with every new proposal put forth by the Bush administration since Sept. 11 to "protect" America from the specter of another terrorist attack, this 43rd president of the United States seems to be doing everything within his powers to fulfill Osama bin Laden’s dire prediction. And the latest assault on our privacy and freedoms, the formation of civilian spy teams, may accomplish that very thing.

Part of a new volunteer Citizen Corps program proposed by President Bush and administered by the U.S. Department of Justice, Operation TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System) attempts to involve Americans in safeguarding homeland security. According to the government website for the program, TIPS, to be launched in August 2002, will provide "millions of American truckers, letter carriers, train conductors, ship captains, utility employees," who "in the daily course of their work, are in a unique position to serve as extra eyes and ears for law enforcement" with "a formal way to report suspicious terrorist activity."

What this means for the average citizen is that whatever you read, eat or do—in the privacy of your home or out in public—will now be suspect in the eyes of your cable repairman, postal carrier, meter man or others who, by way of the services they provide, will have access to your home. So you’d better hide that Tom Clancy novel, disassemble that transistor radio and be nice to the guy installing your TV—because the eyes of Big Brother will soon be watching your every move.

With the installation of this citizen surveillance program, the Fourth Amendment, which has already taken quite a beating in the past several months from the Supreme Court and a variety of anti-terrorism initiatives, will take another hit. After all, what good are warrants and bans against illegal searches and seizures by law enforcement agencies if the government can just have your cleaning lady or telephone repairman snoop around for incriminating information?

And what will happen if these people actually find something possibly incriminating? According to the skeletal information provided on the Citizen Corps site, a toll-free number will connect informants directly to a hotline, which will route calls to the proper law enforcement agency when appropriate. Those unfortunate enough to raise suspicion might find themselves stuck forevermore in a computer database for individuals engaging in possible terrorist activity.

Once upon a time, America was a place where a person was innocent until proven guilty. But under the Bush plan for our country, every American citizen is a suspect until certifiable proof can be found—through any means, fair or foul—that they are, in fact, involved in terrorist activity. And perhaps that is appropriate in a land common sense has gone the way of the Dodo bird.

By directing Americans to conduct illegal searches—searches the police would not have the authority to conduct without a warrant—on their fellow Americans, the U.S. government is essentially turning the average citizen into an extension of the thought police. And suddenly, George Orwell’s futuristic vision of Nineteen Eighty-Four doesn’t seem so farfetched, particularly if you substitute Orwell’s "family" for Bush’s letter carrier, utility worker or cable guy:

The family could not actually be abolished and, indeed, people were encouraged to be fond of their children in almost the old-fashioned way. The children, on the other hand, were systematically turned against their parents and taught to spy on them and report their deviation. The family had become in effect an extension of the Thought Police. It was a device by means of which everyone could be surrounded night and day by informers who knew him immediately. It seems as if we’ve come full circle, reverting back to the Cold War tactics and paranoia of the 1950s, when civil liberties was secondary to security.

"So what’s the big deal?" one reporter asked me. "Wouldn’t such a program—even if it is a violation of our rights—be worth it if we could prevent even one terrorist attack?" It is, as Benjamin Franklin said more than 200 years ago: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

If our law enforcement agencies could be trusted to do their jobs effectively and efficiently, there would be no need for a program that, once implemented, can only be a bureaucratic and legal nightmare.

Although we need to be concerned about terrorist threats from outside our borders, we must also be mindful that our own government could be posing a similar threat. With every draconian piece of legislation crafted by Bush’s henchmen to limit the rights of the American people, President Bush comes ever closer to carrying out bin Laden’s agenda to destroy America—not so much its landmarks and government but our concepts of freedom and justice.

And in the end, the laugh’s on us, because bin Laden doesn’t have to lift a finger to ensure that America’s freedoms are doomed. President Bush is managing it perfectly from the Oval Office, and the American people are falling for it hook, line and sinker.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanstasi; bush; constitution; freedom; laden; liberty; tips

1 posted on 07/18/2002 11:21:23 AM PDT by chunjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chunjay


Oh my God!!! Communism and fascism are here!! Everyone, bury your guns now!!!! (/Sarcasm)
2 posted on 07/18/2002 11:23:57 AM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chunjay
*sigh*

You know, I've just given up, like right this moment. If people didn't learn from Stalin and Hitler, and reading books like Farenheight 451 and 1984, then people will NEVER f***ing learn!! God damn sheep are dragging this country down!
3 posted on 07/18/2002 11:26:19 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: chunjay

T. I. P. S.

=

Towards

Implementing a

Police

State


5 posted on 07/18/2002 11:31:47 AM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Biker Scum
Yeah, but I expected it from the Democrates...

Wrong. The Dems don't want volunteers (like you and me) to do it. They want to greatly expand government by hiring countless new law enforcers, civil servants, and bureaucrats to man this program.

7 posted on 07/18/2002 11:40:01 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
The entire history of governments has been the expansion of their powers to the detriment of their people.

Our founding fathers forged an incredible set of chains to bind this evil inclination.

They have held pretty well up to now, but I fear that is all coming to an end.

The inmates are running the asylum and ir doesn't look good.

8 posted on 07/18/2002 11:48:57 AM PDT by saurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chunjay
Dubya said his job would be easier if he were a dictator.

Looks like he wants an easier job.

9 posted on 07/18/2002 12:16:45 PM PDT by Hardy Harhar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
How many bureaucrats do you think it is going to take to check out all these tips? Someone is going to have to do it. There will have to be people hired - lots of people.
10 posted on 07/18/2002 12:28:08 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fixit
Of course you know that suspicious activity reporting is very extensive in the US? It is found in all levels of govt, public & private institutions, public and private industry groups, and just about any where you might choose to look. There are even college courses on how to spot and report suspicious activity!

Given the fact that this activity reporting is so widespread, I am always amazed at those that see threats in a rinky-dink program like TIPS.

11 posted on 07/18/2002 12:30:12 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Ben Ficklin
The threat is not in the reporting.

The threat is in the organization.

13 posted on 07/18/2002 1:34:22 PM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MRAR15Guy56
I always thought this would be a good Freep screen name.
14 posted on 07/18/2002 1:35:44 PM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chunjay
Once upon a time, America was a place where a person was innocent until proven guilty.

Very true. Now, under the Patriot Act, merely the suspician of wrong-doing is enough for someone to be jailed indefinately - no trial, no nothing.

The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want. But your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it. ~~ Rick Cook

15 posted on 07/18/2002 1:56:48 PM PDT by serinde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fixit
Are the truckers as an organized reportimg group considered threatening? Neighborhood Watch is organized and has elements of TIPS within it? Then there are the other companion organizations of TIPS.

Do you find TIPS, as described by the Wash Times article, to be more threatening than the TIPS described at the official web page?

FWIW, it would appear that the TIPS program is dead before it started. All the individual organized componants will continue. Unorganized individuals will still have the anonymous toll free numbers to call.

16 posted on 07/18/2002 2:23:52 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chunjay
Well I have not read all the details of TIPS. But it sounds like common sense to me it just odd that we need GOVERMENT to tell us to do it. Now if TIPS actually required those people to go into your home or go freelancing that is wrong too. BUt do you mean to tell me if you were a meter reader and you spoted the homeowner building a bomb/hacking bodyparts/making meth. wouldnt you report it?
17 posted on 07/18/2002 8:10:29 PM PDT by Kewlhand`tek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chunjay
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

These are very strange days for America.

I wanted to see change in our elected political leaders that work for us!

Not like this. Not what this administration is doing to our constitutional rights.
18 posted on 08/07/2002 9:47:26 AM PDT by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson