Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex, torture and erotic electrification in America's 'gay' churches
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, July 18, 2002 | By Stephen Bennett

Posted on 07/18/2002 1:12:46 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

No doubt this is a sin-sick world we live in, yet it still amazes me how wicked and debased America continues to become. You better brace yourselves for this one folks.

In my recent WND commentary, "Was Jesus 'gay?'," I addressed the "gay friendly" theology of the Metropolitan Community Church – one of the largest growing networks of homosexual churches worldwide catering to the "gay, lesbian and transgendered communities." In 2003, the MCC's website claims it will have over 70,000 members spanning 17 countries.

The commentary exposed the twisted teachings of the MCC and its homosexual founder, the Reverend Troy R. Perry, an ex-Baptist minister who began the "gay church" in 1968. Many homosexual men and women who have left the church claimed MCC churches around the country were nothing more than "gay pick up joints" and "all the gay sex you want" ... all in the name of Christ.

While researching information on the MCC for my commentary, I found things I never intended to find. What I discovered is absolutely shocking and horrifying – and I caution you with what you are about to read. It is very disturbing.

The Metropolitan Community Church of San Diego welcomes you on their website with "Bringing people closer to God and to one another." It further goes on to say, "May you find the church informative and helpful and even a step that will lead you to a more personal relationship with Jesus Christ ... please come and take advantage of our fellowship opportunities."

"Bringing people together" and "fellowship opportunities" are gross understatements.

On Nov. 1, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., a sadomasochist workshop sponsored by GLO (Leathermen Only) was held at the church hall – "Fisting For Beginners." Several different sado-masochist groups use the church facilities monthly for their instructive workshops. According to their e-mail, they said:

It will be a wild demonstration-lecture and no actual fisting will be done on the premises, but a videotape will supply the missing visuals. Join us at the MCC Church Hall at 4333 30th Street, across the way from the Aztec Bowling Alley.

Fisting, for those of you who are not into sado-masochist perversion, is a dangerous, painful act practiced by many gays, lesbians and heterosexuals of inserting one's complete fist and part of the arm into the sex partner's vagina or anus. For many homosexuals, this is a pleasurable, erotic act. This is just the beginning.

On May 24, 2000, another sado-masochist group, Club X, held a workshop entitled "SM 101" at the church hall. According to their advertisement:

Travis has been presenting this excellent introduction to SM (Sado-Masochism) for several years now. It has proven very effective and well received at all of the "Human Sexuality" college classes he has presented it to as well as to all the police department orientations and sensitivity training sessions he has taught it at.

On Monday, June 5, 2000, the MCC of San Diego allowed GLO to provide what appeared to be another evening "fellowship opportunity" in the church hall for the sex-crazed men and women. The monthly e-mail advertisement read:

Bring your Leather, or toys, cleaned & ready to sell, trade, swap, or give to that someone special. This will be happening inside the meeting hall, the MCC has asked us NOT TO speak too loudly, or display or show off things out in the patio area, or anywhere in public view. ANYONE breaking the rules will be asked to leave, period. Please remember that there are other events that happen at MCC while we are there, & that this is a church.

Did you get the last comment – "that this is a church?" Yeah, right.

July 2000's meeting at the MCC of San Diego reminisced about the "good old days." The advertisement read:

These discussions are designed to restart the traditional cycle that used to exist in the Good Old Days, when Daddies with great experience would teach sexual/sensual/relationship tips to others, as they themselves were taught. We lost nearly a whole generation of gay men that should be here now as role-models, and the surviving older men were scattered in disarray. The preceding "Ask Daddy Anything" discussion was a smashing success, because it succeeded in bringing many good, wise folks back to public admiration and visibility. That same philosophy will continue in all upcoming discussions.

Each event will build upon the previous ones, and will include plenty of opportunities for feedback and discussion from wise and experienced Tops and Bottoms. If you have always desired to have sensual, powerful and meaningful relationships with others (from a Top or Bottom viewpoint), you should not miss any part of this series.

Monday, July 3, 2000, in the church hall was a workshop on "watersports." Watersports, for those of you who don't know, is the perverted act some homosexuals practice by urinating on one another, among other things, and getting their thrills.

In September, it seems the "gay" church got a double dose of "fun": a "bondage" workshop and "piercing" for pleasure workshop was advertised.

'Tis the season to be jolly ... On Wednesday night, Dec. 27, 2000, right after many celebrated the birth of Jesus Christ, the MCC of San Diego allowed yet another workshop, keeping in spirit with all the tinsel and "lights" of the season, appropriately titled "Erotic Electricity." Presented by a man called "Volta," the e-mail advertisement read:

"Volta is a highly skilled practitioner of this form of play and he will be covering all the bases in his presentation. Safety, necessary hardware, basic techniques, and some of the more advanced techniques will also be covered. In addition, Volta is planning on setting up a "hot seat" for those in the audience daring enough to try it out on themselves! This promises to be highly informative and entertaining so come on down Wednesday night to our workshop."

On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, a friend of mine actually attended this workshop at the MCC of San Diego. This person is still recovering from the trauma of the scenes they witnessed. The advertisement read:

This month, Jeff, our fearless leader will be presenting a workshop entitled: 'Single tail whip and sensuous whip play.' Jeff is a well known accomplished artist with the single tail and is lining up some willing assistants for the workshop. Come and learn techniques or just melt away to the sound of the whip, grins ... Various techniques for throwing and playing with whips and how best to position your play partner.

At the event in the MCC church's Fulton Hall, "Jeff" spent the first hour discussing the differences between single tail and other types of whips, including Indiana Jones-style bullwhips and how to identify a whip's maker by its workmanship. He passed several whips around for the audience to examine and discussed how to clean the tip in case skin was broken.

During the second hour, many people were "consensually" and brutally whipped, including one woman who actually stripped to her bra and was whipped from front and behind. After finishing whipping each willing subject, Jeff proudly examined and displayed his handiwork: the welts.

If the MCC Church of San Diego is not hard-core enough for you, how about the Metropolitan Community Church in the Valley of North Hollywood?

On April 24, 2002, a workshop at the church was advertised entitled "Branding by Cauterization." Cauterization is the burning and searing of the flesh with a hot iron. The burns are so severe, the wounds don't even have time to bleed.

May 22nd featured "Master & Slavery as a Lifestyle" and on June 26th "Hot Wax" – sexual gratification from dripping burning candle wax onto your partner.

The group that uses the MCC in the Valley of North Hollywood, Avatar-L.A. is currently advertising their upcoming events (please forgive me for the language – this is their copy, not mine):

Aug. 3, 2002 – Clips, Clamps & Clothespins / Tit, Cock & Ball Torture (According to their promo – 'Besides hanging up clothes to dry, this demo will show how clothespins, various clips and clamps can be used safely to enduce the most exquisite pain and suffering.')

Sept. 7, 2002 – Erotic Shaving / Spanking

Oct. 5, 2002 – Fisting 101 (seems to be a popular workshop)

Nov. 2, 2002 – Erotic Electricity 101

Nov. 15, 2002 – Erotic Electricity 201 (Erotic Electricity 101 is a prerequisite to this class)

Friends, these sick and perverted "workshops" are not only going on in the Metropolitan Community Churches in California, but others around the country as well. Much of this chilling information is readily available right on the Internet.

Perversion and wickedness are abounding in America and my friends, it is high time we repented of our indifference and complacency. From Hollywood, the media, the government, the public schools … right into our churches, we are now seeing the rotten fruit and stench of the sin of homosexuality in our land. The "gay" agenda has been so successful thus far for one reason: we've let it.

Never forget, we need to always love the sinner, yet we can hate the sin.

America: It's high time we've finally said, "Enough is enough."


Editor's note: The July issue of WND's popular monthly print magazine, Whistleblower, is a groundbreaking look at the issue of homosexuality in America. Subscribe to Whistleblower at WND's online store, ShopNetDaily.


Stephen Bennett is a Christian recording artist and commentator who is featured nationally on radio, television and print. He is emerging as one of the nation's key speakers on "coming out" of homosexuality. For further information, visit Stephen Bennett's website.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: deviancy; homosexuality; mcc; religiousleft; sandiego; sin; stephenbennett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: F16Fighter
A primary symptom of those in the asylum is the belief that everyone else has a warped perspective.

Redneck version
I'm alright! The whole world is screwd up!

41 posted on 07/18/2002 11:28:41 AM PDT by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"Us adults are trying to have a debate here."

LOL -- And what a pathetic excuse for a "debate."

Tell ya what -- After you're done with your pretentiously assinine "debating" of the merits of gay-church sanctioned "fisting" and "bondage," perhaps you can go on defending more sophisticated and poignant issues like the "right" of gay churches to also preach the Gospel while lying in their own fecal matter.

42 posted on 07/18/2002 11:37:24 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WKB
:-D
43 posted on 07/18/2002 11:38:01 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Tell ya what -- After you're done with your pretentiously assinine "debating" of the merits of gay-church sanctioned "fisting" and "bondage," perhaps you can go on defending more sophisticated and poignant issues like the "right" of gay churches to also preach the Gospel while lying in their own fecal matter.

Well, if you had actually bothered to read my posts, you'd seen I never actually said "Yay fisting". It was more like "If the church allows it, and no kids are at these workshops, and they aren't actually having sex, I'm not happy with the idea of it being at a church, but big deal."

Of course, the discussion is pretty much concluded. If nothing else, I learned who the good debaters are, the ones who can make good points without resorting to constant abuse and name calling, and which ones...well..can't really seem to control themselves.

Do let us all know when you've hit puberty, alright? :)
44 posted on 07/18/2002 11:53:15 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"I'm not happy with the idea of it [perverted rites in the name of God] being at church, but big deal."

Simply incredulous...

Tell me something -- do you feel a nation's morality is in anyway tied to it's greatness? OR is it irrelevant??

45 posted on 07/18/2002 12:02:06 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
"I'm not happy with the idea of it [perverted rites in the name of God] being at church, but big deal."

Oh for crying the hell out loud, now you're just making sh*t up, and putting words in my mouth. PLEASE show me in the article where these sex workshops are being done "in the name of God". You won't find it, because it isn't in there. The Church merely lent it's space out to a third pary, but it's not like this wacked-out crap is going on as part and parcle of it's regular religious services. Unless I misread the article, that is.(willing to make a concession I might have.) It's not like when I go to play Unreal Tournament at the space the Methodist church let us rent out every third Saturday that I'm gibbing people "in the name of Jesus Christ". That would be just plain silly.

Tell me something -- do you feel a nation's morality is in anyway tied to it's greatness? OR is it irrelevant??

Who's morality are we talking about? Just because someone likes kinky sex in the bedroom doesn't mean they aren't a moral, decent person in the most important matters. Just as someones professing to be a Christian doesn't instantly make them a just and moral person. I think the amount that Governments respect the individuals rights has a lot more to do with greatness than anything else.

So yes, a nation that can follow certain absolute morals, and respect the rights endowed by our Creator, is naturally going to do better than a group that doesn't...say, America vs. The Middle East. I just don't see dripping some candle wax on someone in the privacy of their own bedroom as tantamount to the destruction of the Republic. If I were you, I'd worry a little less about little things like that, and focus on the Big Picture: Like how the Federal Government has been stedily erroding away the Constitution since the days of FDR. Reverting to Socialism, that's what's killing this country more than anything....
46 posted on 07/18/2002 12:27:29 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
BTTT
47 posted on 07/18/2002 1:13:09 PM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
I understand that you seem to take the "Libertarian" position, that anyone can do anything to anyone, as long as it doesn't endanger or harm YOU , or, maybe harm a n0n-consenting adult, or child . Would that be accurate ?
However, many of those homosexual practices do damage to people and spread diseases . So, as far as that church is concerned, I'll stay away from it, and any known (to me) members, thank you .
I really think there could possibly be some public health issues involved .
48 posted on 07/18/2002 1:13:18 PM PDT by dadwags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Also posted here
49 posted on 07/18/2002 1:18:31 PM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
I understand that you seem to take the "Libertarian" position, that anyone can do anything to anyone, as long as it doesn't endanger or harm YOU , or, maybe harm a n0n-consenting adult, or child . Would that be accurate ?

Acurate to a point. I consider myself more a Constitutionalist, than a member of the LP (which has some good ideas, but also has some god-awful goofy ones.) If you must call me a "Libertarian", call me a small-l libertarian.

But there is no maybe about the harm against a non-consenting adult or child. If you are doing something against a non-consenting adult or child (minors can't consent, as far as I'm concerned.), then that harms society. Rape, murder, theft, etc etc. The usurpation of the inaliable rights of one person initiated by another individual (or group of individuals) is always wrong.

However, I fail to see how a person smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home, or having kinky sex in the privacy of their own home is really the business of any apparatus of Government. Now if said person gets stoned and drives a car, thats the only thing that should be illegal is driving while under the influence, not the actual act of getting stoned.

However, many of those homosexual practices do damage to people and spread diseases .

If gay people are having gay sex, and getting AIDS from it..they knew the risks..they should have to take personal responsibility for what they did to themselves. I mean, what are you going to do: pass more and more laws to protect gay people from themselves?

Sadly, everyone has the right to self-destruction. If I go and buy a bottle of Draino and drink it down and kill myself, thats my own stupid fault, and there shouldn't be a Government agency that goes around trying to prohibit Draino, or make people get a license for it, so that they can protect idiots who want to make a Draino Martini for themselves.

Now, as far as I can see, the blood supply is very well protected against AIDS at this point in time...maybe I'm wrong, but that's the general impression I'm under, so other than that, I fail to see how allowing gay people to have sex in the privacy of their own homes is really signalling the death of the Republic. And I don't think that it's just gay people who are into spanking each other, or dripping candle wax on each other, or zapping eachs others privates with some electricity...

So, as far as that church is concerned, I'll stay away from it, and any known (to me) members, thank you .

I strongly encourage you to do this, as is your right and responsibility.

I really think there could possibly be some public health issues involved

Okay..I'll bite. Like what? I could maybe see the gay sex angle involved, but people flogging each other in the bedroom, and dripping candle wax on each other in the bedroom? I mean, honestly.

Lets face facts, the moment we begin to ban certain private behaviors "for the good of Society" we start to flirt dangerously with Socialism. And before someone starts building a strawman, there is a HUGE difference between building a nuclear bomb in your basement, and kinky sex in your bedroom.

I mean, whats next? Will we have "Religious Police" going door to door, checking up on people? That idea is really popular over in Saudi Arabia. Or maybe next, we'll have a Government program that encourages service people with access to private homes to rat people out to the Government? (Oh wait...if TIPS passes, we'll have that anyhow...)

Truely, Socialists, and their desire to protect Society from itself is the monster destroying the Republic. The "politically correct movement" is the ultimate development of this brand of Socialism, but it's sad to see when Right-wingers fall prey to Socialist thought as well...
50 posted on 07/18/2002 1:41:01 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
...a Church has a right to do what it wants

Who sez? A church does NOT have the right to do whatever it wants when it crosses into the realm of assault on the members (dripping hot wax, electric probes, etc.)

51 posted on 07/18/2002 2:23:44 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
I just don't see dripping some candle wax on someone in the privacy of their own bedroom...<p<Why would anyone want to do that to someone they love? Your argument is really sick.
52 posted on 07/18/2002 2:38:50 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Who sez? A church does NOT have the right to do whatever it wants when it crosses into the realm of assault on the members (dripping hot wax, electric probes, etc.)

First off, it wasn't the Church doing it perse, it was several different third party groups. The Church was just allowing them the use of their space.

Second off, all those people who attended those workshops did so of their own free will. They participated of their own free will. If they were coerced into it, they would report it to the police. If they are unable to, and you have secret, mysterious evidence I don't know about that proves it was coersion, go to the damn police with it. Sheesh!
53 posted on 07/18/2002 2:43:45 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Why would anyone want to do that to someone they love? Your argument is really sick.

If my wife finds the sensation of a wax candle that produces relatively low heat as it melts being dripped over her back, then why shouldn't I want to do it? If it doesn't harm her, and she wants me to do it as a bedroom game, why not? Just because it doesn't punch your clock is no reason to brand others doing consensual stuff, not terribly damaging stuff in their own private bedrooms as perverts who need to be locked up "for their own protection". You CAN do a lot of this stuff with some relative degree of saftey, you know. What, do you think this is Saudi Arabia or old-school Afganistan? Maybe you would be more comfortable there?

Or if my wife finds it a turn on for me to spank her, or flog her, who are you to judge what we do in the privacy of our own homes?

Now, if it's a situation where the wife hands me a knife, and says "Stab me, that turns me on", that is obviously quite different. I wouldn't want my wife to hurt herself, and I certainly won't be a party to helping her. And I don't believe that someone can consent to being killed, except in some extrodinarily rare circumstances.

You sound like a theocratic Socialist, who thinks its just fine to spy on people in their own homes, and whose beliefs must mirror your own precisely.

But what I might hypothetically do is irrelevant here. The point of this post is that a Christian Church is renting out it's space to other groups of people so they can do Sex Workshops. The question is: Is this an acceptable thing for a Christian Church (or any religious institution) to be doing, even if they aren't directly sponsoring it? And my answer is: No, probably not, although they can do what they want to do, as long as they are made to deal with the consequences of their actions.
54 posted on 07/18/2002 3:00:01 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"Otherwise, to me, this guy comes off as a Socialist Theocrat that wants to pass more laws telling us what we can and can not do in the privacy of our own bedrooms."

Er, you mean the 'privacy of their own public houses of Worship.' None of these 'get togethers' were in a bedroom, they were in a 'church'.

I think the main problem is zoning ... is this area zoned to allow bordellos, meat markets, and nudist colonies?


55 posted on 08/19/2003 4:04:57 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"Lets face facts, the moment we begin to ban certain private behaviors "for the good of Society" we start to flirt dangerously with Socialism."

oh puhleeze. Child abuse in a bedroom is private.
We should allow that?

Any behavior getting outlawed is "socialism"???

Anyway, socialism refers to makin the means of production owned by the Government. How is telling people not to engage in group anal sex orgies in churches got anything do with that?

"However, I fail to see how a person smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home,"

This was in a church, not a home.

"And before someone starts building a strawman, ... Will we have "Religious Police" going door to door, checking up on people? "

No need to build a strawman, you already have.

Apparently you can brook no shades of gray between ignoring/accepting this behavior and having Gestapo tactics to stamp it out. How very black-n-white of you, but ...

Consider the possibility that just because you have a legal right to do something, doesnt stop it from being appalling appalling and something worth condemning.
56 posted on 08/19/2003 4:12:01 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
~Zot~
57 posted on 08/19/2003 4:13:05 PM PDT by BeerSwillr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"These folks might as well be Unitarians if they are going to do this kind of thing in their church, I suppose..."

LOL ... definite note of agreement on that!!

IMHO, this is basically a pagan institution with a "Christian" label on it.
58 posted on 08/19/2003 4:14:31 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
America is deporting GOD, instead of illegal aliens... Can a nation long survive with that kind of logic..... Yes it can.... but survive as what!..?

59 posted on 08/19/2003 5:11:53 PM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
ping
60 posted on 08/19/2003 7:38:12 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson