Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Really Happened to TWA Flight 800?
WorldNetDaily ^ | Jack Cashill & James Sanders

Posted on 07/17/2002 9:10:52 AM PDT by VectoRama

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28302

Wednesday, July 17, 2002



THE DOWNING OF TWA FLIGHT 800
'Hey, look at the fireworks'
Excerpt from 'First Strike' quotes witnesses of speeding 'silver bullet'


Posted: July 17, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: With the sixth anniversary of the downing of TWA Flight 800 upon us, Jack Cashill and James Sanders finally have unraveled the mystery of what really happened on the night of July 17, 1996 – thanks to new information that has come to light only after Sept. 11. Their book, "First Strike – TWA Flight 800 and the Attack on America," also answers the crucial question of why America still doesn't know what really happened. This excerpt from Chapter 1 of the book gives readers a glimpse of what Cashill and Sanders have discovered. Published by WND Books, "First Strike" will be available in January.

The authors' video, "Silenced, Flight 800 and the Subversion of Justice," is available through ShopNetDaily.

By Jack Cashill and James Sanders


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

It arrived shortly before noon, Washington time, on July 17 – a fax sent to Al-Hayah in London, the most prestigious Arabic language newspaper. Sent by the Islamic Change Movement – the jihad wing in the Arabian Peninsula – the warning came one day after the group had taken responsibility for the destruction of Khobar Towers. It was as serious as a truck bomb:

The mujahedin will deliver the ultimate response to the threats of the foolish American president. Everyone will be amazed at the size of that response. Determining the time and the place is the hand of Al-Mujahedin, and the invaders should be prepared to leave ... dead or alive. Their time is at the morning-dawn. Is not the morning-dawn near?

As the sun was about to rise on the Arabian Peninsula, it was about to set on Long Island. At 8:31 Dwight Brumley, whose long Navy career included special expertise in electronic warfare, put down the book he was reading and glanced out the window of US Air 217. Night had already fallen to the east, the direction in which he looked.

"I noticed off the right side what appeared to be a small private airplane that was flying pretty much at a course right at the US Air flight," Brumley recounts. "I followed it until the fuselage and the inboard wing cut off my field of view. My first thought – that was awfully close!" Brumley estimates that the plane passed a mere 300 or 400 feet beneath him.

About 15 seconds after the small plane had passed, Brumley noticed "what appeared to be some kind of a flare," but he realized quickly that this bright, burning object ascending off the ocean was no flare. "It was definitely moving pretty much parallel to the US Air Flight and it was moving at least as fast, perhaps even faster."

As the flare-like object raced north, and Flight 800 ascended slowly and innocently east along the Long Island coast, Mike Wire, a millwright from Philadelphia working on a Westhampton bridge, saw a streak of light rise up from behind a Westhampton house and zigzag south, southeast away from shore at about a 40 degree angle, leaving a white smoke trail behind it.

Richard Goss, upon seeing the same object, turned to his friends at the yacht club and said, "Hey, look at the fireworks." Everybody turned to look, and they all watched it climb. "It was bright, very bright," says Goss, "and, you know, that almost bright pink … and orange glow around it, and it traveled up."

Vacationer Lisa Perry, on her Fire Island deck, watched an object shoot up over the dunes of Fire Island.

"It was shiny, like a new dime," says Perry. "It looked like a plane without wings. It had no windows. It was as if there was a flame at the back of it, like a Bunsen burner. It was like a silver bullet." The object was heading east, southeast toward the Hamptons.

As Paul Angelides walked out onto his Westhampton deck, he picked up what was likely the same object now high in the sky. From his angle, it appeared to be a "red phosphorescent object ... leaving a white smoke trail." At first he thought the object a distress flare, but he soon realized it was too large and moving too fast. Spellbound, he followed the object as it moved out over the ocean in the direction of the horizon.

Goss followed it, too. "It seemed to go away in the distance toward the south, and that's when I saw it veer left, which would bring it out east. It was a sharp left."

From a Westhampton school parking lot, Joseph Delgado saw Brumley's streak, the one heading north toward shore and slightly west. As he told the FBI, he saw an object like "a firework" ascend almost vertically. The object had a "bright white light with a reddish pink aura surrounding it." The tail, gray in color, "moved in a squiggly pattern." From Delgado's perspective, the object "arced off to the right in a south westerly direction."

At 8:31, FAA radar operators out of Islip saw an unknown object appear on screen and head toward Flight 800. At the same moment, FAA radar picked up something else unusual – a ship of good size nearly right under Flight 800's airborne position.

The two National Guard pilots in their nearby helicopter now picked up the streaks high in the sky. Capt. Chris Baur saw the streak Brumley had first observed: "Almost due south, there was a hard white light, like burning pyrotechnics, in level flight. I was trying to figure out what it was. It was the wrong color for flares. It struck an object coming from the right and made it explode."

Maj. Fritz Meyer, a winner of the Distinguished Flying Cross for his service over Vietnam, saw the southbound projectile clearest. "It was definitely a rocket motor," says Meyer.

Delgado saw a second object "glitter" in the sky and the first object move up toward it. He thought at first it was "going to slightly miss" the glittering object, TWA 800, but it appeared to make "a dramatic correction at the last second." Then Delgado saw a "white puff."

"From my vantage point," says Goss, "there was a direct explosion that followed, and then after that there was a second explosion that was off to the east a little farther that was much larger."

Meyer saw a bright white light also. "What I saw explode was definitely ordnance," he said. "The initiating event was a high velocity explosion, not fuel. It was ordnance."

"I then saw a series of flashes, one in the sky and another closer to the horizon. I remember straining to see what was happening," says Angelides. "There was a dot on the horizon near the action, which I perceived as a boat."

"About two seconds later," claimed Meyer, "lower, I saw one or two yellow explosions, from that the fireball, third. The first two high-velocity, the last low-velocity petrochemical explosion."

"Then a moment later there was another explosion, and the plane broke jaggedly in the sky," says Perry. "The nose is continuing to go forward; the left wing is gliding off in its own direction, drifting in an arc gracefully down; the right wing and passenger window are doing the same in their direction out to the right; and the tail with its fireball leaps up and then promptly into the water below. The sounds were a huge BOOM! – then another BOOM!"

"You could feel the concussion like a shock wave," reports Mike Wire of the initial blast. Indeed, it shook the bridge on which he was standing in Westhampton even at ten miles distance.

"The sounds shook the house," remembers Angelides. "My wife, who was on the bathroom floor drying our son from his bath, felt the floor shaking as she heard the noise and I heard her cry out, 'What is going on?'"

And then confusion, a hellish, horrific confusion. "There seemed to be a lot of chaos out there," says Angelides. Now he, Wire, Perry, Meyer, Baur, Goss, Delgado and Brumley watched as the plane's fuel tanks exploded, and Flight 800 morphed into what Delgado described as a "firebox" and others as a "fireball."

"It got much larger, maybe four or five times as large," says Brumley, who was watching the explosion from overhead. "It was the same explosion. It just got bigger. My first thought was, 'Boy, what was that?'"

"When that airplane blew up it immediately began falling," adds Meyer. "It came right out of the sky. From the first moment, it was going down."

Brumley saw the burning debris hit the water and turned to summon a flight attendant. As he did, a passenger in the seat behind him, James Nugent, cried out, "Did you see that too?" Brumley and the others were hardly alone in what they had seen. On that soft summer eve, thousands were watching the sea and the sky. More than 700 of them would share their stories with the FBI.


Related special offers:

"Silenced, Flight 800 and the Subversion of Justice"

"Altered Evidence: How the Justice Department Framed a Journalist and His Wife"




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2002 9:10:52 AM PDT by VectoRama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
Art Bell? Is that you?

I won't go back to Roswell.

2 posted on 07/17/2002 9:12:42 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
Nothing to see here. Move along...™
3 posted on 07/17/2002 9:17:28 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Info bump. Truly scary.
4 posted on 07/17/2002 9:20:50 AM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
The streak was a meteorite that skipped off the ocean and back into the clouds... Please, move along!
5 posted on 07/17/2002 9:21:29 AM PDT by Nexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
I used to work at Boeing and had the good fortune to work with the Director of Engineering sent to investigate the causes of the TWA800 crash.

He said it was obvious that an object had penetrated the fuselage and exploded from the inside, out. He concluded that a "missile" was definitely the most likely of culprits. His comments were of course off the record and never made it into the official report Boeing was forced to submit to the government.

The real question isn't "what" happened, but "why"?

6 posted on 07/17/2002 9:24:56 AM PDT by AmericanCompatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
Insight magazine July 29, 2002 cites a Brookhaven National Lab report classified "Secret" by the FBI and never made part of the NTSB public docket:

Wreckage items of "unknown origin" which were analyzed show twenty 0.2" diameter round pellets imbedded in victims bodies. Pellets were comprised of aluminum titanium matrix and other elements including zirconum, barium and cesium.

The latter are consistent with pyrotechnics and the matrix is consistent with the fragmentation elements of antiaircraft missile warheads.

FIRO ( Flight 800 Investigators Organization ) is petitioning NTSB to re-open the investigation on the basis of this evidence which was not considered in the earlier findings.

7 posted on 07/17/2002 9:27:56 AM PDT by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukie
Yes it was a missle that downed Flight 800 but I doubt that the powers that be in the Us Government who are responsible for the coverup of that simple fact will ever let the full truth be known. You are correct in the question of "why?" There are two why's why was that particular aircraft shot down and whywas it covered up. Of course for an answer to the first question it must be ascertained who specifically fired the SAM. All of these questions are of course moot until the Government decides to level with the citizens.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

8 posted on 07/17/2002 9:38:41 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCompatriot
You'll take my guns away when you pry it from my cold, dead body. I'm not giving my rights away to anyone. That's how I was raised and that's how I'll go to my grave. Who wants to live in tyranny, anyway? Our Founding Father's certainly didn't.

If it comes to that, I just hope us "true" patriots have enough time and sense to organize. Otherwise, it will be a futile fight against the beast.

9 posted on 07/17/2002 9:45:09 AM PDT by AmericanCompatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Terrorist shootdown? US Navy shootdown. Don't matter. The re-election of Bilk Xlinton was the over-riding aspect of this incident. He gets his intern. We get screwed. Snufalopogus gets "This Week" and we get more liberal propoganda. Wowser!
10 posted on 07/17/2002 9:48:40 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Of course for an answer to the first question it must be ascertained who specifically fired the SAM.

What SAM has an altitude range of 13,500 feet?

11 posted on 07/17/2002 9:51:04 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VectoRama
Maj. Fritz Meyer, a winner of the Distinguished Flying Cross for his service over Vietnam, saw the southbound projectile clearest. "It was definitely a rocket motor,"... Meyer saw a bright white light also. "What I saw explode was definitely ordnance," he said. "The initiating event was a high velocity explosion, not fuel. It was ordnance."

I'd like to know how the FBI could ignore such an eyewitness.

Whoah! My bad. I forgot. That was Janet Reno's FBI.

12 posted on 07/17/2002 9:59:51 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Good to exchange thoughts with you again, harpseal.

Tom Stallcup of the FIRO has received letters from NTSB Chairwoman Carol Carmody ( James Hall's successor ) saying that FIRO "would not be getting answers to the questions raised and that it was not in anyone's interest ( at NTSB ? ) even to correspond with us"

Stallcup concludes that "NTSB does not have the guts to honestly search for and report the truth."

An agency of govenment which breaches trust in such manner is derelict. Those who abide such dereliction have violated their oaths of office under the constitution. Or has the leviathan grown beyond the constitutional shackles provided by the framers?

Best to you and always remember to check 6 too, harpseal.




13 posted on 07/17/2002 10:02:39 AM PDT by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1L
"What SAM has an altitude range of 13,500 feet"

It was probably not a shoulder fired MANPAD. Those are equipped with small warheads and their infrared guidance would have targeted a heat source like the engine exhaust plume. IMHO, a MANPAD would more likely claimed an engine rather than the entire aircraft.
14 posted on 07/17/2002 10:09:29 AM PDT by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCompatriot; rdavis84; Fred Mertz; rubbertramp; mancini; honway
....the Director of Engineering sent to investigate the causes of the TWA800 crash.

He said it was obvious that an object had penetrated the fuselage and exploded from the inside, out. He concluded that a "missile" was definitely the most likely of culprits.

thanx for your insight. I wonder what the threat/payoff was to get boeing to misrepresent the facts in their own report?

was it the fear of having gummit contracts stopped or cancelled?
were they "rewarded" with new gummit contracts?

p.s. I'll toast one up for the truth & hank "hocker" gray today.

15 posted on 07/17/2002 10:25:22 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thinden
I wonder what the threat/payoff was to get boeing to misrepresent the facts in their own report?

How about "military" contracts and "favored" status for domestic and international business? I'd say without the government on its side, Boeing would have a much greater time providing profits to its stockholders.

16 posted on 07/17/2002 10:34:15 AM PDT by AmericanCompatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dukie
Yes, here's some details from Insight on the pellets embedded in some Flight 800 victims...

According to Stalcup, "More than that, we have information that shows that 20 unusual .2-inch-diameter round pellets that were found in bodies were withheld from the NTSB but analyzed by the FBI and found to have been made of aluminum titanium matrix and other elements like zirconium, barium and cerium. These are pyrotechnics or incendiary devices, and the matrix structure of these objects is consistent with pellets used in antiaircraft missiles."

The FIRO chairman continues: "In fact, I found a quote in National Defense magazine that was referring to warheads that said 'pellets imbedded in titanium matrix' are used in antiaircraft warheads. The 'secret' [Brookhaven] report analysis concluded that the origin of the pellets is 'unknown' and that one of the pellets was submitted for identification because of its dissimilarity in appearance with TWA 800 debris. ...'"

The Brookhaven report on the pellets and a review of it was just posted http://www.twa800.com/pdf/brookhaven-report.pdf

17 posted on 07/17/2002 10:50:03 AM PDT by VectoRama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: *TWA800_list
Index Bump
18 posted on 07/17/2002 10:56:41 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCompatriot
"The real question isn't "what" happened, but "why"?"

And the follow up question......why the coverup??

19 posted on 07/17/2002 11:03:53 AM PDT by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCompatriot; rdavis84; Donald Stone; independentmind; Fred Mertz; Wallaby; honway
I'd say without the government on its side, Boeing would have a much greater time providing profits to its stockholders.

interesting point you make!

in '95 BA was trading in the low 20's.
by '96 the stock was trading around high $20's to low $30's.

in what may be considered on of the most contrarian moves of all time, after the "center fuel tank" explosion of TWA flight 800 (which, ironically never grounded the fleet - including AF1), Boeing stock basically doubled to nearly $60 per share over the next two years!

20 posted on 07/17/2002 11:07:03 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson