To: Dukie
Yes it was a missle that downed Flight 800 but I doubt that the powers that be in the Us Government who are responsible for the coverup of that simple fact will ever let the full truth be known. You are correct in the question of "why?" There are two why's why was that particular aircraft shot down and whywas it covered up. Of course for an answer to the first question it must be ascertained who specifically fired the SAM. All of these questions are of course moot until the Government decides to level with the citizens.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
8 posted on
07/17/2002 9:38:41 AM PDT by
harpseal
To: harpseal
Terrorist shootdown? US Navy shootdown. Don't matter. The re-election of Bilk Xlinton was the over-riding aspect of this incident. He gets his intern. We get screwed. Snufalopogus gets "This Week" and we get more liberal propoganda. Wowser!
To: harpseal
Of course for an answer to the first question it must be ascertained who specifically fired the SAM.What SAM has an altitude range of 13,500 feet?
11 posted on
07/17/2002 9:51:04 AM PDT by
1L
To: harpseal
Good to exchange thoughts with you again, harpseal.
Tom Stallcup of the FIRO has received letters from NTSB Chairwoman Carol Carmody ( James Hall's successor ) saying that FIRO "would not be getting answers to the questions raised and that it was not in anyone's interest ( at NTSB ? ) even to correspond with us"
Stallcup concludes that "NTSB does not have the guts to honestly search for and report the truth."
An agency of govenment which breaches trust in such manner is derelict. Those who abide such dereliction have violated their oaths of office under the constitution. Or has the leviathan grown beyond the constitutional shackles provided by the framers?
Best to you and always remember to check 6 too, harpseal.
13 posted on
07/17/2002 10:02:39 AM PDT by
Dukie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson