Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thinden
I wonder what the threat/payoff was to get boeing to misrepresent the facts in their own report?

How about "military" contracts and "favored" status for domestic and international business? I'd say without the government on its side, Boeing would have a much greater time providing profits to its stockholders.

16 posted on 07/17/2002 10:34:15 AM PDT by AmericanCompatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanCompatriot; rdavis84; Donald Stone; independentmind; Fred Mertz; Wallaby; honway
I'd say without the government on its side, Boeing would have a much greater time providing profits to its stockholders.

interesting point you make!

in '95 BA was trading in the low 20's.
by '96 the stock was trading around high $20's to low $30's.

in what may be considered on of the most contrarian moves of all time, after the "center fuel tank" explosion of TWA flight 800 (which, ironically never grounded the fleet - including AF1), Boeing stock basically doubled to nearly $60 per share over the next two years!

20 posted on 07/17/2002 11:07:03 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson