Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
See Item #2 in Post #46. One of the things that prompted me to come up with this scenario is that the U.S. Navy (from what I understand) was already "on the scene."

Of course, they denied they were on the scene at first.

What you're suggesting is that based upon "information" they fired on a passenger plane 80 miles from the WTC flying straight and level in the opposite direction from their supposed target. Get real!

ML/NJ

71 posted on 07/17/2002 10:10:29 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
Before I go any further I have to ask you a question:

Do you believe the "official" explanation of the crash of TWA Flight 800?

I just need to know this -- I am quite certain that a) the official explanation was a lot of bullsh!t, b) the plane was brought down by a surface-based projectile of some kind, and c) the surface-based projectile was not launched by terrorists.

With these three things in mind, I'd say we are just arguing about the details of what really happened.

80 posted on 07/17/2002 11:12:47 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson