Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Racist rapes: Finally the truth comes out (Arabs/Muslims rape aussies)
The Sun-Herald ^ | July 14 2002 | Miranda Devine

Posted on 07/13/2002 5:10:44 PM PDT by Michael2001

So now we know the facts, straight from the Supreme Court, that a group of Lebanese Muslim gang rapists from south-western Sydney hunted their victims on the basis of their ethnicity and subjected them to hours of degrading, dehumanising torture. The young women, and girls as young as 14, were "sluts" and "Aussie pigs", the rapists said. So now that some of the perpetrators are in jail, will those people who cried racism and media "sensationalism" hang their heads in shame? Hardly.

The journalists, academics, legal brains and politicians who tried to claim last August that the gang rapes of south-western Sydney were just a run-of-the-mill police blotter story being beaten up by racists, scaremongers and political opportunists don't ever want to acknowledge the truth about that ugly episode in Australian history. They don't want to acknowledge the fear and tension that ran through a part of Sydney they rarely visit and can never understand.

This newspaper was the first to report the story, which had been common knowledge in police and media circles, and it has never censored the race element.

Even last week, with the conviction of two brothers for their part in the gang rape of Miss D, who was 16 when she was held at gunpoint in a Greenacre park, there were media outlets that downplayed the story and air-brushed race from it.

Yet the victims have been crying out for the truth to be told. In court on Friday, one victim gave another a card on which she had written

"Truth is Justice".

In August, when Judge Megan Latham handed out laughably lenient sentences to three men in one gang rape case, which were later more than doubled on appeal, she made a special point of debunking the race link: "There is no evidence before me of any racial element in the commission of these offences," she said. "There is nothing said or done by the offenders which provides the slightest basis for imputing to them some discrimination in terms of the nationality of their victims."

Except that later one of the victims complained her victim impact statement had been "censored" of any "ethnic" references by prosecutors intent on a plea bargain. She was convinced she was raped because of her ethnicity. "You deserve it because you're an Australian," the rapists told her during the five-hour attack.

It's just so inconvenient of the victims to insist on telling the truth.

"I looked in his eyes. I had never seen such indifference," one 18-year-old victim, codenamed Miss C, told the court, remembering one of the 14 men who called her "Aussie pig", gang raped her 25 times over a six-hour period in Bankstown and Chullora, and then turned a hose on her. "I'm going to f*** you Leb style," he said.

Fourteen gang rapists have been convicted, or pleaded guilty, thanks to the courage of seven victims who testified for days in court as their tormentors smirked nearby, the men's families threatened them and defence lawyers suggested they had enjoyed the rapes.

"They're very brave, very strong and very courageous young women," said Salvation Army Major Joyce Harmer, who held the hands of many of the victims through the trials. "They knew this was something they had to do."

There were encouraging signs by the end of the week that some Muslim community leaders were talking of "Muslims accepting responsibility that they may have failed to do things that would have prevented these things from happening", as Amjad Mehboob, chief executive for the Federation of Islamic Councils, told ABC Radio on Friday.

Keysar Trad, vice-president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, said: "It is certainly a disgrace to our community that people who were born to a Muslim family would commit such heinous crimes." But he went on to say it was "rather unfair" that the rapists' ethnicity had been reported "because these boys themselves have completely disaffiliated themselves from their culture or their religion".

Yes, it is unfair that the vast bulk of law-abiding Lebanese Muslim boys and men should be smeared by association. But their temporary discomfort may be necessary so that the powerful social tool of shame is applied to the families and communities that nurtured the rapists, gave them succour and brought them up with such a hatred of Australia's dominant culture and contempt for its women that they think of an 18-year-old girl, dressed for a job interview in her best suit, sitting on a train reading a book, as a slut.

These were racist crimes. They were hate crimes. The rapists chose their victims on the basis of race. That fact is crucial to this story. If the perpetrators had been Anglo-Celtic Australians, the furore would have been enormous. No newspaper would have left out that fact and you can bet the guilt and shame would have been spread far and wide.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: freebilly
I know of no Christians, in positions of authority, who would remain silent if any group committed crimes in the name of Christ.

Haven't been following recent news stories about the Catholic Church, have you? These bishops, obviously in positions of authority, were at least accessories, and at worst co-conspirators.

As far as I know, the perpetrators of these vile acts were not doing them in the name of Christ, although purportedly some told the boys that these sexual acts were another way of taking communion.

Actually, I don't disagree with you. I think if some group started slaughtering non-Christians and claimed it was in the name of Christ, Christians throughout the world would denounce them. I know I would.

Christians in the past have committed a great many crimes in the name of Christ. The difference is the Muslims are commiting crimes in the name of Allah today, and few Muslims are willing to say it is un-Islamic. They may be afraid of the fanatics, or they may in agreement with them.

Either way, they seem to have no clue what kind of fire they are playing with.

61 posted on 07/13/2002 10:24:16 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Haven't been following recent news stories about the Catholic Church, have you? These bishops, obviously in positions of authority, were at least accessories, and at worst co-conspirators.

I said Christian.... ;O)

62 posted on 07/13/2002 10:34:46 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Christians in the past have committed a great many crimes in the name of Christ. The difference is the Muslims are commiting crimes in the name of Allah today, and few Muslims are willing to say it is un-Islamic. They may be afraid of the fanatics, or they may in agreement with them. Either way, they seem to have no clue what kind of fire they are playing with.

We are in agreement.

63 posted on 07/13/2002 10:35:45 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: watchin
Love the way you talk!
64 posted on 07/13/2002 11:01:01 PM PDT by 2rightsleftcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Righty1
Sex terrorist visas
65 posted on 07/13/2002 11:30:24 PM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Restorer; freebilly
So freebilly isn't up on the latest excuses by Catholic clerics ... you don't know what you are missing out on. Never seen such a series of excuses. I suppose that they do it to try the Christian patience of their congregations. But note that (in Australia) more doctors have been charged with sexual offenses than priests.

Restorer writes: "these laws are ... un-Islamic". I found a published source on this. I don't put much stake on anonymous internet sites, as any halfwit can put up an opinion. This is in a book by Ayatollah S.F. Milani, who is a real person (!) and publishes with Islamic and secular presses.

Frequently Asked Questions, Islamic answers for modern problems. (Islam in English Press, 2000), p 97.

Question: Someone told me that a girl needs five male witnesses before she can claim that she was raped.

Answer: Your informant's confusion arises from considering together two entirely different issues - adultery and rape. Four just witnessesare required by those who wish to accuse another of adultery - zina. Rape is an extremely serious crime. The suggestion that this violent act must be witnessed by four independent people is absurd if not downright evil. If a woman says no to sexual intercourse, whatever the circumstances, the use of coercion or force is a crime. There are not two sets of acceptable standards, one for Muslims and one for those who are not Muslim. In cases of rape, the female, in all judicial systems is likely to be asked if she consented to sexual intercourse. While lawyers' questions try to influence judges that the woman is in some way culpable in encouraging the perpetrator, the judges will determine the case in the light of the evidence put before them.

This is a Shia, not a Sunni, source. It is not a casual opinion, this Ayatollah is a recognised law giver, this is a published "fatwa" and is binding on his congregation. But his writ doesn't run in the Pakistani legal system.
66 posted on 07/13/2002 11:39:28 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
"Lawyers are pretty much the same everywhere". Yes, but in Australia and Britain the JUDGES are a huge problem. One can understand that the defense lawyer has to put forward any argument they can for the defendant. There is no need for the man on the bench to join in, and yet often he does. Judges in Australia have come out with some extraordinary statements, and decisions. Also, it is not unknown for the Crown Prosector to sympathise with the rapist, and even to volunteer to drop the case. In one tragic recent case, the Prosector did this, and the accused went on, immediately, to rape and murder two further girls.
67 posted on 07/13/2002 11:46:41 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ventana
He does? What the heck kind of an Orthodox Jew is this guy? V's wife.

Apparently Joey believes they will keep their terrorism in Israel, and become peace loving folk as they enter the good ole' USA. Check out this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/704689/posts
68 posted on 07/13/2002 11:56:24 PM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
But note that (in Australia) more doctors have been charged with sexual offenses than priests.

I would suspect that statistically speaking the priests have probably been charged with more pedophilia related offenses than the doctors have been (this is a left-handed compliment to the doctors of Australia).

69 posted on 07/13/2002 11:58:48 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Postbro1
Oh no don't say that the Muslim community are actually going to take responsibility for something. They can't be held responsible because I'm certain that they were only acting out the only way they could. They are so oppressed you know?

I'm surpised they didn't blame this on the Mossad.
70 posted on 07/14/2002 12:02:58 AM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
Their silence is deafening.

Their silence is deafening.

71 posted on 07/14/2002 12:09:53 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
I'm surpised they didn't blame this on the Mossad.

Don't give them any ideas

72 posted on 07/14/2002 12:36:52 AM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
Good find. These rapes were posted on FR when they occurred and it was a source of endless frustration that the truth was being hidden.
73 posted on 07/14/2002 12:49:42 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001; Travis McGee
THESE are the faces of two of the brutal rapists convicted of vicious attacks on seven teenage women in Sydney's western suburbs.

(Note : the above image and link may be temporary, due to the Daily Telegraph's peculiar archive system.)

74 posted on 07/14/2002 1:38:36 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
GANG RAPE THUGS CONVICTED By CINDY WOCKNER Legal Affairs Editor 12jul02

A TEENAGER yesterday became the seventh woman to sit in court and watch the men who had gang raped her convicted of their crimes.

Most of the seven have never met. They are victims of 14 young males who now have been convicted or pleaded guilty to five different gang rapes and sexual assaults in western Sydney over two months two years ago.


75 posted on 07/14/2002 1:41:52 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I just hope the victims who testified against these filthy pigs can perhaps find some peace, through knowing they've done something incredibly brave, and good.


76 posted on 07/14/2002 1:49:44 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
What is the man on the street reaction in your country? Is the media reflecting it or trying to impose on it?
77 posted on 07/14/2002 3:11:03 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Michael2001
And Joe Liberman wants to bring more of these animals to the US

And NZ ugly lezza of a Prime Minister does bring more and more of them here: everyone of them who couldn't do it to Australia and even wasn't granted a refugee status by the UN!

78 posted on 07/14/2002 3:34:49 AM PDT by Neophyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; Orual
These were racist crimes. They were hate crimes. The rapists chose their victims on the basis of race. That fact is crucial to this story.

Punchy writing ping.

79 posted on 07/14/2002 3:34:57 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventana
What the heck kind of an Orthodox Jew is this guy?

He's a Genetically Modified Orthodox Jew - with a substantial part of Orthodox "genes" replaced by trendy leftie-lib ones. Unfortunately, it's not a rare species nowadays.

I have just lost a battle with nominally Jewish activists here in NZ who refused to publish in their shitty newsletter my point of view (shared by many!) on unacceptability of hugging and kissing with the local Muslim crowd in the time of war the Islam waged on all of us. Moreover, when an evening paper did publish my letter, they planned to forward a refutation!

As to the Aussie gang-rape story, it did appear in NZ week-end press, but guess what version of it? Yeah, you're right: that with the Muslim connection under as heavy make-up as possible.

80 posted on 07/14/2002 4:01:04 AM PDT by Neophyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson