Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | July 13, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge allows Danielle's dad back in court

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- The father of 7-year-old murder victim Danielle van Dam will be allowed to attend the remaining days of her accused murderer's trial, Judge William Mudd ruled Thursday.

But he warned Damon van Dam that one more incident will result in him being banned from the courthouse.


Two weeks ago, Judge Mudd deemed Damon van Dam a "security risk" for repeatedly staring down his daughter's accused murderer, David Westerfield, in courtroom hallways despite several warnings from sheriff's deputies and prosecutors.

Mudd then barred Damon van Dam from the third floor of the downtown San Diego courthouse where Westerfield's emotionally charged trial on charges he kidnapped and murdered Danielle is being held.

On Thursday, an attorney for the van Dam family requested that Damon van Dam be allowed back in the courtroom so he could provide emotional support to his wife, Brenda van Dam, and dispel any jury speculation that his absence meant he didn't care about the trial or that he had something to hide.

The van Dams were present at the hearing, but did not address the court.

Mudd said he believed Damon van Dam has had time to think about his actions and told him that security officials were willing to give him another chance.

"If I get one report of one incident, I will ban you from the courthouse," Mudd told van Dam.

Mudd also cautioned the couple that closing arguments in the case may push them to the limits of what they can handle. The prosecution has indicted it intends to use photos of Danielle's decomposing body while presenting its argument that Westerfield molested the second-grader before she was suffocated and her nude body dumped along a rural road.

Danielle disappeared from her second-story bedroom sometime after her father tucked her into bed on Feb. 1. The next morning she was gone. Westerfield was arrested for the crime five days before her body was discovered by search volunteers on Feb. 27.

The medical examiner has testified that her body was too badly decomposed to determine time of death or whether she was sexually assaulted.

The defense is likely to attack the van Dams' integrity and argue their lifestyle choices ---- including the van Dams' admitted drug use and previous sexual relations with other couples ---- put their children at risk. The van Dams also have two sons.

Prosecutors and the defense attorney have made it their practice to notify the judge before showing jurors graphic photographs of Danielle's body during the six-week trial so the van Dams could be asked to leave the courtroom.

Mudd said he expects the van Dams to leave if any part of the trial becomes too much for them.

"I don't think anybody is downplaying the emotion that both Mr. and Mrs. van Dam are going through," Mudd said.

Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, said Westerfield did not object to Damon van Dam returning to the courtroom, but there still were security concerns. Feldman said Damon van Dam was "mad-dogging" the defense team, or shooting dirty looks at the attorneys.

Feldman said the van Dams have been "verbally attacking" potential buyers who are looking at Westerfield's Sabre Springs home, which is two doors down from their house. Westerfield signed the house over to his attorneys.

Feldman also accused Brenda van Dam of muttering a curse word at one of Westerfield's friends who testified earlier this week.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek told Mudd that Brenda van Dam denies making any such comment and a victim witness advocate who accompanies her each day backs up her account.

Testimony in the Westerfield trial is on hold until July 22 when Mudd returns from a vacation. At Thursday's hearing, Feldman said he expects the defense will take two or three days more before resting its case. Prosecutors may then present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments begin sometime in late July or early August.

 

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

7/12/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-707 next last
To: pyx
Under 18....
561 posted on 07/14/2002 7:34:57 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
"And you know that Geraldo had fat from his buttocks transplanted into his face during a televised plastic surgery session--my laugh about all that is that it made him a real-life butt-head."


ROTFLMRO!!!! I had heard he was going to have that surgery done, but glad I didn't watch it. What kind of egomaniac would go to such lengths to get 'ratings', other than Whorealdo? Is there nothing he won't do on camera, he can get away with? Who wants to see his rear end? I don't even like looking at his face!!!


562 posted on 07/14/2002 7:38:26 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I'm going to check but I thought BVD testified under cross that she thinks she may have told DW about the father daughter dance. Does this sound familiar to anyone?
563 posted on 07/14/2002 7:39:05 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm sure what you mean is, enough doubt that you can honestly say "the prosecution has not proven this case beyond a reasonable doubt." I think personally that we are well past that point, but the defense still has time to convience you. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. There can't twelve as tough as you on the jury!
564 posted on 07/14/2002 7:39:21 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
Odd Girl Out

I haven't read this yet. I'll have to look for it. I understand the concept very well, however.

I've always thought that this was feminism's "dirty little secret" - just how vicious girls/women could be to those who don't "meet the standards".
565 posted on 07/14/2002 7:40:05 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Yes, I couldn't & wouldn't have made that up!!
566 posted on 07/14/2002 7:40:40 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Do you remember the classic film "Twelve Angry Men"?
567 posted on 07/14/2002 7:41:56 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Isn't it just amazing that these little leaks about what's been said in the affidavits happen to come out NOW

There is a huge difference between "leaks" and the court ordering the unsealing of records. This information is the result of the latter.

568 posted on 07/14/2002 7:42:45 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: gigi
She said it at some point. Prelim, current trial or to the press. I know she said she told DW about the dance coming up the following week.
569 posted on 07/14/2002 7:44:03 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Yeah, but now he's Kimmee's hero, just like Nasty Grace. :)
570 posted on 07/14/2002 7:44:52 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
"Yeah, but now he's Kimmee's hero, just like Nasty Grace."


Well, everyone's entitled to their opinion. LOL!


571 posted on 07/14/2002 7:46:21 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I don't want to be misunderstood. My friend and I were quite civil. That is why we continue a friendship. A deeper friendship was not possible because I could not comprehend her support of all things democrat nor she for my support of republicans and GWB in particular. So now we avoid the topic (back to square one).
572 posted on 07/14/2002 7:47:08 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
I'm waiting for the prosecution to show that he did ...

And that is the beauty of the American "system"

The state must prove him guilty..he does not HAVE to prove his innocence.......do you wonder if people understand our system?

573 posted on 07/14/2002 7:48:35 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I don't listen to Rick Roberts so I am at a disadvantage. I have seen the sea change in his fan base, though.
574 posted on 07/14/2002 7:48:59 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
I know judges never put number on it, but what error rate should the jury shoot for: 1 in ten, 1 in hundred, or 1 in thousand wrong convictions? If you are willing to accept 1 in ten then the jury could be told let him go "only if there is overwelling doubt". One in 100 might require "resonable doubt" and one in a thousand might "any doubt at all". I personally think our jury system probably does operate at about 1 in 100 innocent convictions. What do think?
575 posted on 07/14/2002 7:50:27 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Oh, I understood what you were saying. Earlier, Kim had mentioned about heated policical family discussions and I just tossed that in replying to you.

I do think back in that time, most people were more civil, understanding & tolerant of one another. I don't recall any family arguments during my childhood.
576 posted on 07/14/2002 7:50:45 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Whoops. You are correct. That's "unsealed", not "sealed". Guess I'm not that perfect.

My comments about the accuracy of information contained within being as accurate as that of previous LE documents/statements still stands. They are not that perfect, either.
577 posted on 07/14/2002 7:51:35 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Do you mean that once she found out you weren't for clinton/gore she stopped talking to you? That's a shame if that's the way it turned out. What's annoying is that by avoiding the topics, by avoiding discussing it..change will not occur..and things will remain status quo.
578 posted on 07/14/2002 7:52:50 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
So the computer expert and the bug guy and the proof that BVD lied through her boobs meant nothing huh?.....No you are waiting for DW to prove he was in a church retreat all week end...then maybe you will have doubts!
579 posted on 07/14/2002 7:54:27 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Miz, he is still the idiot that he was when you all were so proud of him for revealing all the info about the van dams.
580 posted on 07/14/2002 7:55:25 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson