Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: Miss Marple
I pray that Halliburton will SUE Larry for this malicious and frivolous action. THEN they can have discovery on HIM.
102 posted on 07/10/2002 2:02:31 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CecilRhodesGhost
You are the second person on this site to say "DU" whatever that is!?

DemocraticUnderground.com, the internet watering hole for Demoncrats and various other liberal animals.

There's a past history of liberal disruptors showing up here and causing whatever problems they can.

Consequently, if you're new around here, and someone disagrees with something you post, you're likely to be branded a troll for a while. No big deal. Hang around for a while and it goes away as people get to know you.

103 posted on 07/10/2002 2:03:30 PM PDT by john in missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: SierraWasp
I'd like to know what is really behind Klayman's latest blunder. All the targets he has to chose from (Jeehehsee Jaaahaaakson, Sharpton, Socialists in Congress) , but who does he pick? Why our Vice-President of course.

This man needs to get a life or take a vacation

105 posted on 07/10/2002 2:05:58 PM PDT by Bible Baptist Lady Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Saw it, read it. Larry must be running from someone, or trying to get up some $$$ for a suit about to be filed against him.

LARRY IS A FRIEND OF THE CLINTONS.

106 posted on 07/10/2002 2:06:00 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Are you still breathing, or are you guffawing too hard?

I'm basically in shock. I thought the green and gold Green Bay Packer fan casket I saw here yesterday could not be topped.

107 posted on 07/10/2002 2:06:36 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
Yes, I remember that quite well. Remember how everybody in the courtroom laughed when he said, "Larry Klayman, from the non-partisan firm of Judicial Watch?"
108 posted on 07/10/2002 2:06:49 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: john in missouri
Thanks to you in MO.
109 posted on 07/10/2002 2:07:04 PM PDT by CecilRhodesGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
We were all rooting for counter-suits on the thread last night (except for the usual group of Klayman supporters).

In a civil suit, the attorneys can hire investigators to go into every nook and cranny of a plaintiff's life. In most lawsuits, due to lack of money, people don't do this.

But I am certain, as God is my witness, that every resource of the oil industry is being called down on Larry Klayman. And I am glad, glad, glad!!

110 posted on 07/10/2002 2:07:29 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
demorats just want to bring the economy down
111 posted on 07/10/2002 2:08:09 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2
Klayman isn't ever going to "get" anybody. Never has. Never will.
112 posted on 07/10/2002 2:08:47 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Well, are we going to let them?
113 posted on 07/10/2002 2:09:11 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: BUSHdude2000
While Clinton was in office, Mr. Klayman billed himself as the CONSERVATIVE watch dog group, not the BIPARTISAN watch dog group.

He's dropped that now. I suspect he'll try to reinstate it after this year's fund raising is less than the 15 million he got in 2001.

114 posted on 07/10/2002 2:09:54 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
This could very well be Larry's Waterloo! And about time. I'm so sick of his postering. Dick Cheney and Halliburton will wipe the floor with him.
115 posted on 07/10/2002 2:11:37 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Nice to know I have a Freeper partner when we both get sued by Klayman tying him to the clintons!!!!
116 posted on 07/10/2002 2:11:38 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Remember how everybody in the courtroom laughed when he said, "Larry Klayman, from the non-partisan firm of Judicial Watch?"

Yes! It was one of the great comic relief moments of the whole ordeal.

117 posted on 07/10/2002 2:12:28 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Wonder if Klayman will just do a class action suit against those who know the truth.
118 posted on 07/10/2002 2:13:19 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I did see references to Halliburton press releases. This--despite its publicity, IMHO, is wafer thin. But I expected no less from JW.

But no, no independent investigation by JW, unless you count collection of Halliburton press releases, their annual reports and a New York Times article as "investigation." JW will try to fill in the gping holes through discovery, you betcha.

119 posted on 07/10/2002 2:13:43 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
Loved it, didn't you?

Yup. The look on Klayman's face was priceless.

120 posted on 07/10/2002 2:13:47 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 3,801-3,815 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson