Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Live - Speech on Corporate Responsibilty
MSNBC

Posted on 07/09/2002 8:38:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Says Fraudulent CEOs Should Lose All Compensation


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 481-496 next last
To: cactusSharp
I'd watch and see what Neil Cavuto says later today.
261 posted on 07/09/2002 9:57:26 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: chookter
As far as I am concerned, we ARE at war with crooked CEO's who are undermining our economy during time of war. During WWII people who did stuff like this were charged with profiteering and went to jail.

Tell me why we should be supporting crooked CEO's. That is not a constituency I care to cultivate.

262 posted on 07/09/2002 9:57:50 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
"$3,400,000,000,000 Of Taxpayers' Money Is Missing , one year...1998, Feds. lost over a TRILLION taxpayers $$$$. Couldn't even give accounting information....no one goes to jail, no one investigates..."

Good Placement. ;-)

263 posted on 07/09/2002 9:57:53 AM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
They are in full Panic Attack and will be until we start some heavy duty PreEmptive Strikes against the Islamic Thugs of Iran, Iraq and Syria.

There will be no strikes against Iran, nor Syria. No arab coalition would allow it.

We are many, many months out from any action in Iraq if, IF, an arab coalition will allow it.

Which do you think will happen first, the DOJ Task Force 'SWAT Team' acts against a US company or the US acts unilaterally against a terrorist nation? Answer it honestly....

264 posted on 07/09/2002 9:58:20 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
I'm turning you in for Elder Abuse for not have a Barf Alert/Warning on this vile comment by you:

Honestly,I'd rather watch Hillary put on pantyhose!

Now I need to go throw up, use a gallon of Scope, brush my teeth again and swallowed several Zantacs and anti acids to get my stomach back to normal. What a terrible word picture to use on elder conservatives!

265 posted on 07/09/2002 9:58:35 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I'd love to see those polls.
266 posted on 07/09/2002 9:58:46 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
There is another point of hypocrisy on the part of the RATS. They said this issue is now at the very top of their agenda. Prescription drugs for seniors is now nowhere. Neither is passing the appropriations bill on defense and homeland security. Why can't the American people see that the RATS don't care about seniors or the safety of the country? All they care about is getting the President. The public needs to wake up.
267 posted on 07/09/2002 9:59:15 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That they are going to be held personally responsible for their company's books.

And why not? I own a small business, and I am personally responsible for all of it. I am personally responsible for every blasted regulation that the State and the Feds pass -- have to post them all, even though no one reads them. Costs me several hundred dollars a year for the updates.

I am personally responsible if some jerk that works for me brings his favorite software from home and loads it on his computer.

I am personally responsible for all the bills that people run up around here.

I am personally responsible even though some of my customers don't pay me -- I still have to pay for the components I purchased to produce their product.

When the economy goes in the tank, like it has for the last 2 years, I am still personally responsible for the taxes, the heat, the AC, the lights, any lease payments, whether I make money, or not.

I am even personally responsible for all of the errors the former owner made in the last 30 years.

268 posted on 07/09/2002 10:00:01 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
My very first impression of Brown is that you have to be on quaaludes to watch him.
269 posted on 07/09/2002 10:00:14 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
#188

Give 'em hell, Gramps!

270 posted on 07/09/2002 10:01:11 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Rush's quoting of Peeuuuu Research Polling to buttress his wacky opinion has made me ill and I have a cast iron stomach.
271 posted on 07/09/2002 10:01:26 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Go to ReformPartyOrphansWhoHateAmerica24/7.com! You haven't a clue about life when adults are running the country!

They will appreciate your spew of teenage mantras/hatred. We don't!
272 posted on 07/09/2002 10:01:41 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Actually, the most important thing is the financial fraud swat team, which looks to me to be serious business. When that group swings into action, we will see some serious stuff. I do not think it is for window dressing, despite what the nay-sayers believe.
273 posted on 07/09/2002 10:02:37 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Now what did Rush say?
274 posted on 07/09/2002 10:02:38 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: chookter
We are many, many months out from any action in Iraq if, IF, an arab coalition will allow it.

From all indications I don't think there will be an overt attack against Iraq. Looks like the "regime change" will come from within, with our covert help. But you are correct in the time window, probably many months away.

275 posted on 07/09/2002 10:03:02 AM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Again just for you. The candid photo of Da$$hole listening to President GW's speech.


276 posted on 07/09/2002 10:03:30 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Here is the actual sentence in question, from what I can tell:

"The lure of heady profits of the late 1990s spawned abuses and excesses."

I think Rush is blowing it out of proportion a bit.

OTOH, this whole issue is blown out of proportion a bit. We have laws that govern these matters, and they can and will be enforced against lawbreakers. New regulations aren't necessarily needed. The Democrats inside and outside the media have hyped this as a means to try to gain some sort of political traction.

There is an unfortunately tendency by politicians, especially Democrats, to respond to the violation of law, by proposing more laws. Illogical.

277 posted on 07/09/2002 10:03:32 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: rintense
The usual nit-picking. He also doesn't like the restrictions on boards of directors, which makes me wonder how many boards he and Marta sit on.

I am not listening to him. He is turning into an unpleasant and bitter person.

278 posted on 07/09/2002 10:04:14 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
As far as I am concerned, we ARE at war with crooked CEO's who are undermining our economy during time of war. During WWII people who did stuff like this were charged with profiteering and went to jail.

'War Profiteering' punishments can only be enforced when there is an actual declaration of war.

Now, are "crooked CEO's" the ones 'chasing the lure of bloated profits' like in Bush's speech, or the dishonest ones with twisted Clintonian ethics?

Is pursuing profits crooked? or lying?

Tell me why we should be supporting crooked CEO's. That is not a constituency I care to cultivate.

Would you work for a company with a CEO who doesn't pursue profit?

279 posted on 07/09/2002 10:04:22 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
There is another point of hypocrisy on the part of the RATS. They said this issue is now at the very top of their agenda

I would like know when they will start funding the Military

Because if you don't win this war .. We won't have to worry about all that other stuff

280 posted on 07/09/2002 10:04:27 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 481-496 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson