Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Live - Speech on Corporate Responsibilty
MSNBC

Posted on 07/09/2002 8:38:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Says Fraudulent CEOs Should Lose All Compensation


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-496 next last
To: Howlin
No prob!

If you make each unit on the Y axis small enough, you can make the graph look really formidable, like the market is tanking.

So far, it looks to me like the market in aggregate is taking a wait-and-see reaction.

101 posted on 07/09/2002 9:06:35 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Dobbs also slapped Greenfield for his Harkin stock deal comments. Go Lou!!!!
102 posted on 07/09/2002 9:06:37 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I liked it when he called the new fraud group he created by executive order the "coorporate fraud SWAT team.

He did?

Heyyyyyyyy thumps up

103 posted on 07/09/2002 9:06:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Where the heck are all the Bush detractors who have been saying he was opposed to these things he is doing? Why aren't they on this thread?
104 posted on 07/09/2002 9:06:52 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Little Tommy D@sshole is mad about the E. O. because now the future Congressional witch hunt "investigations" he was plotting with Hillary and Little Dickie will look even more irrelevant and ridiculous. LOLOLOLOL
105 posted on 07/09/2002 9:07:31 AM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
> > An EO . . . Keeps it all under the executive branch appointees

> Explain why this would upset Daschole?

Two reasons:

  1. It's a "turf thing". He'd want to take credit for it.
  2. Pork. They can load the bill with their own spending, knowing the President would have a hard time vetoing it.

106 posted on 07/09/2002 9:07:37 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
The President proposes new provisions to strengthen the ability of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to freeze improper payments to corporate executives while a company is under investigation.

That is a very bad idea. It alone makes us a fascist state,

107 posted on 07/09/2002 9:07:48 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Anyone hear Imus this morning? He cut David Gregorys legs off when he mentioned the Harkin story. All poor David could do was hem and haw after that. Hilarious.
108 posted on 07/09/2002 9:07:57 AM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
They are down in the basement rec room coming up with a bunch of new lines. I am sure they will be here momentarily.
109 posted on 07/09/2002 9:08:07 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
Really? How? Will they investigate Terry?
110 posted on 07/09/2002 9:08:11 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Yup, look for more editorials charging a lack of moral standing, because of Krugmans Half facted Harken Column, last week.(all Of Krugmans columns contain precisely the left half of the facts (if there are any...))
111 posted on 07/09/2002 9:08:14 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
The President proposes new provisions to strengthen the ability of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to freeze improper payments to corporate executives while a company is under investigation.

That is a very bad idea. It alone makes us a fascist state.

I can not see how it is constitutional.

112 posted on 07/09/2002 9:08:35 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: All

Corporate Responsibility? How about Government Responsibility?



THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202

May 22, 2001

Honorable Charles Norwood
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Norwood:

I am writing to provide you with a report of our efforts to correct long-standing management problems at the Department of Education. Some of the persistent management problems that I inherited have been identified in the Ernst & Young financial statement audit for the period ended September 2000, and in the testimony to Congress by the Department's Inspector General. As a result of the Inspector General's testimony, there have been widely quoted news reports suggesting that $450 million was lost due to mismanagement, fraud, or theft.

This letter is intended to explain what we have learned to date as a result of our investigations regarding that figure. It will also explain the nature and type of payments or costs reflected in the $450 million, how they were discovered and whether they resulted in actual losses to the Department, methods of recovery we have initiated to recapture any lost funds, and actions I have undertaken to ensure that this situation does not occur again. I want to clarify at the outset that the $450 million figure does not represent funds lost by the Department and is not a proper measure of the Department's financial management problems.

This Department provides approximately $63 billion in payments to recipients annually. These funds are awarded to a wide range of government agencies, private and public organizations, and individuals. For example, recipients typically include state and local education agencies, colleges and universities, nonprofit organizations, private contractors, and individual students. In making these payments, the Department makes about 500,000 financial transactions every year.

The Inspector General characterized $450 million of these payments or costs as improper over the period 1998-2000. The following three categories explain how this $450 million was determined:

$250 million represents duplicate payments or two payments provided to one entity for the same purpose. The Department recovered this entire amount and no financial loss occurred to the taxpayer. The money was not properly awarded, but it has been recovered. The $250 million is not "missing."

$100 million was identified as legal judgments against grantees or other recipients of Department funds who may have obtained funds through illegal or improper methods. Responsibility for the recovery of this money has been turned over to the Justice Department, and they have informed us that to date they have recovered approximately $40 million of these funds. We are continuing to work aggressively with the Justice Department to pursue recovery of the remaining funds.

  • $100 million was identified as misspent through routine financial audits of grantees, contractors, and other fund recipients conducted by the Department and Inspector General. As a result of this audit work, the Inspector General questioned, and Department staff later agreed, that approximately $100 million had been misspent. This includes, for example, funds not spent in accordance with the terms and conditions of a grant award, or expenditures where the recipient was unable to provide adequate documentation to support the expenditures. We have recovered almost $3 million of these funds, and have promissory notes outstanding from entities and students that should result in the recovery of an additional $53 million. I must note, however, that it is unlikely that most of the remaining $44 million will be recovered. Some of the recipients of this money have now declared bankruptcy. Also, it may ultimately be determined that some of the money may not be owed to the Department, since the audit determinations may be reduced or overturned through legal or administrative appeals.

    None of the $200 million described in the two preceding bullets represents losses due to financial mismanagement by the Department. Rather, these amounts reflect wrongdoing by recipients of Department funds, failure to adhere to contract or grant terms, or lack of documentation by recipients. Efforts by the Inspector General's office, other Department offices, and the Justice Department to find these problems, recover the funds, and enforce the law are examples of efforts we need to make in order to protect the federal interest.

    As you know, I have launched an initiative to strengthen Department management, with a particular emphasis on financial management. A few weeks ago, I held a news conference and told the press and the American taxpayer that yes, there have been problems in the past, and that there are no excuses for those problems. Our job is straightforward: fix the problems and protect the taxpayers' money.

    Our two major goals are to obtain a clean audit (an unqualified financial statement audit opinion) and remove the General Accounting Office's "high risk" designation from our student financial aid programs. I believe that achievement of these goals is vital to assure public confidence in the integrity of the Department, and our ability to carry out our mission to improve education in our Nation. The American people and the Congress have every right to expect effective stewardship of taxpayer funds by the Department. Rest assured, as Secretary of Education, it is my mission to see that taxpayers' money is protected and spent on educating children.

    We are working hard to correct long-standing management problems we found in the Department. I look forward to sharing the results of our management improvement efforts regularly with Congress and the public. I also look forward to working with you and others in Congress as we strive to reform American education and improve student achievement so that no child is left behind.

    Sincerely,

    /s/

    Rod Paige

  • Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the Nation.

     

    113 posted on 07/09/2002 9:08:39 AM PDT by Registered
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

    To: LisaFab
    Wall Street leaders; almost dead silence.
    114 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:08 AM PDT by Howlin
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

    To: justshe
    I saw Dobbs yesterday and just laughed .. he doesn't mince words .. LOL
    115 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:09 AM PDT by Mo1
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

    To: mombonn
    Hope I didn't lose a client, but it was fun to see him turn green at learning W has an MBA.

    He didn't know that? How uninformed can you get?

    116 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:12 AM PDT by AmishDude
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

    To: nicmarlo
    I believe the Daschole/senate idea is to create an independent panel
    117 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:14 AM PDT by steve50
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

    To: RedBloodedAmerican
    You know, what really strikes me about that press conference is how differently he addresses questions than Clinton did. Clinton would have replied, "I don't know anything about it, talk to my lawyer. I need to get back to the work for the American People."
    118 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:16 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

    To: RedBloodedAmerican
    hehehe. Bozo.
    119 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:17 AM PDT by Registered
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

    To: ladtx
    Aaaaargh, I missed it. Shoot! I would've loved to see Gregory getting his ears pinned back. What did Gregory say?
    120 posted on 07/09/2002 9:09:22 AM PDT by mewzilla
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


    Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
    first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-496 next last

    Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

    Free Republic
    Browse · Search
    News/Activism
    Topics · Post Article

    FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
    FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson