Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb
If there were "too many" guns, then the odds would be that at least one other person besides the perp would have been armed....and the perp(s I still believe their handler is wandering around loose) would have been dead before the attack could have been carried out.

Sorry, but this is not accurate.

The shooter approached, drew a weapon and was immediately tackled and/or shot. If everybody within shooting distance had fired at him, the only likely result would have been a lot more friendly fire casualties.

Surprise attacks, by definition, almost always get off a few shots before defenders can respond.

Didn't you see The Matrix?

Moving Security to the front doors would only result in the attacks taking place outside rather than inside. Anywhere you locate Security, it will result in a large, stationary, vulnerable crowd.

1,066 posted on 07/04/2002 4:00:48 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer
"Suprise" attacks, by definition, are a surprise...when they succeed. The "surprise" part was not the point of my statement...the idea of ARMED CITIZENS was. Look at what has happened in Israel since Barak took away the guns of loyal, well trained, former IDF.
1,101 posted on 07/04/2002 4:19:38 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1066 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson