Skip to comments.
Enough, already, from the evangelical atheists
Houston Chronicle ^
| July 2, 2002
| MARTIN MILLER
Posted on 07/02/2002 5:16:45 PM PDT by Dog Gone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
07/02/2002 5:16:45 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: wardcleaver
bttt
To: Dog Gone
Good point. I am certian most athiests don't mind a bit the phrase "under God". I remember as a kid just mimicing the pledge without any comprehension of it anyway.
To: Dog Gone
I love it! Thank you to the atheist author.
To: Dog Gone
While working in the home of a military man today, I noticed the enscription on a WW I German helmet he happened to have on his desk. If I translated corectly, it read (in German):
With God for King and Fatherland
I wonder if the Kaiser's god was the same as our God?
5
posted on
07/02/2002 5:27:25 PM PDT
by
snopercod
To: snopercod
I wonder if the Kaiser's god was the same as our God?
More than likely, the same God as Osama's.
To: Dog Gone
I used to be an atheist. But then, as I started to learn more about the Universe by reading about developments in modern physics, I became persuaded that atheism was incompatible with a scientific approach to existence.
True, I am only a layman, and there is a lot about physics I don't understand. But the more I listen to scientists trying to translate the meaning of their mathematical equations into English, the more they begin to sound like religious mystics.
And if they ever do find the Unified FIeld Theory, which I think is likely, I think the scientific proof of God's existence will be undeniable.
7
posted on
07/02/2002 6:09:34 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: snopercod
Perhaps "God" as Napoleon said, " is on the side with the most Battalions"
To: Maceman
"I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals, or would directly sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. I cannot do this in spite of the fact that mechanistic causality has, to a certain extent, been placed in doubt by modern science. [He was speaking of Quantum Mechanics and the breaking down of determinism.] My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. Morality is of the highest importance -- but for us, not for God."
[Albert Einstein, from "Albert Einstein: The Human Side", edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press]
To: Dog Gone
If you stuck a gun to my head (and, thankfully, I live in a country where that would happen only to rid me of my wallet rather than my religious beliefs),Just wait, give them another 10 to 15 years and I would not doubt one bit.
10
posted on
07/02/2002 6:32:16 PM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Dog Gone
Evangelical atheists like Newdow delight in the Santa Claus analogy. It's memorable, sounds clever and is incredibly insulting. I've even heard the same assertion made with the Easter Bunny. In part, the evangelicals make such callous remarks because they see themselves as bringers of "Truth." And if a few feelings get hurt along the way, they reason, that's the price for the liberating light they bring. But I would never make such a comparison, nor would many atheists I know. We wouldn't because it not only is bad manners and shows a lack of intellectual humility, it's also grossly unfair. It's empirically verifiable that there is no Santa Claus. The same cannot be said of God.
This part I don't understand. I don't see how you can empirically verify that there is no Santa Claus. You can't prove a negative. I have lost my faith in Santa Claus, for the same reason I lost my faith in God - there's no empirical evidence
for either magical person's existence.
11
posted on
07/02/2002 6:35:29 PM PDT
by
jennyp
To: jennyp
Sshhh. He's trying to make nice. The world didn't just appear 'spontaneously,' either.
12
posted on
07/02/2002 6:43:18 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: reasonseeker
Morality is of the highest importance -- but for us, not for God.I don't disagree with anything in this quote. I said I am not an atheist, but I am also not a Christian, and long ago abandoned the Judaism of my youth.
I never believed that God needed us to worship Him because he is insecure. I just think that God is like a river that we need to go to gain strength and spiritual nourishment. I don't think that God gets anything out of being worshipped. The worship is for us, not for him (I use "him" for convenience, because I believe that God is beyond gender).
As for morality, I see it as a code that we need to live by because it works for human beings in God's physical universe. I don't think God sits in individual judgment on us. I just think that the Universe is the physical manefestation of God's law, and we act in opposition to that to our own detriment and ultimate destruction.
So I think Einstein's perspective makes a lot of sense here.
13
posted on
07/02/2002 6:43:35 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: snopercod
While working in the home of a military man today, I noticed the enscription on a WW I German helmet he happened to have on his desk. If I translated corectly, it read (in German):
With God for King and Fatherland
German soldiers of WWII wore a belt buckle with the inscription: Gött mit uns.
America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (60 minute video)
14
posted on
07/02/2002 7:34:15 PM PDT
by
JCG
To: jennyp
Jenny, some of the world's greatest scientists in history would disagree with you greatly on that one.
To: jennyp
I don't see how you can empirically verify that there is no Santa Claus. Instead of going to the media, Virginia could have stayed up all night waiting for the jolly old elf to come down the chimney. Seems pretty empirical to me.
16
posted on
07/02/2002 7:41:49 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: Dog Gone
Excellent.
Could have been written by Pardek, if Pardek knew how to write.
To: jennyp
To: Senator Pardek
Pardek knows how to write, but he has other priorities.
But I agree, this was excellent.
19
posted on
07/02/2002 7:51:32 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Atheists
"The other problem with evangelicals like Newdow is that while he's so disrespectful about the beliefs of others, he insists his own be treated with the utmost reverence."
"They are intolerant, pushy and self-righteous."
This has been my experience exactly.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson