1 posted on
07/01/2002 4:23:41 AM PDT by
mhking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: mhking
And, as he does, the US looks more and more to be a long way away from the rest of the world.Bump for a good thing.
To: mhking
This artical was posted recently (last couple of days) already.
Made me sick that time too...
3 posted on
07/01/2002 4:55:42 AM PDT by
DB
To: mhking
Ever notice the similarities between the overseas assessment of Bush's presidency and and that of Reagan's? I'm not saying GW is Reagan, but the world seems to need to bring the US president down a peg when he demonstrates any sort of fortitude.
This "article" displays a rant typical of the international numbskull: Bush is dumb, which is why Tom Cruise is right to fear white collar crime. This guy needs some medication.
4 posted on
07/01/2002 5:28:12 AM PDT by
Mr. Bird
To: mhking
Euro-Aussebarf Alert is right...big time!!! This entire article is nothing but a lot of incoherent babbling:
bedbug...Tom Cruise...catatonic cat...Enron, blah, blah, blah...Doormouse (!?).
Somehow I was able to stay with him through all that to get to his main point:
Bush is listening to Rumsfeld, and other strange voices not least the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon.
Thanks for posting this. The true agenda of the loony left keeps making itself more and more apparent.
To: mhking
I forgot that corporate fraud is exclusively an American thing...ohhh except for that multi-billion dollar bankruptcy of that British Investment Bank... was it Barclay's?
To: mhking
What a loony freakin socialist mindset.
Where was government? Where was control?
I believe the government at the time was busy losing $6 billion in fraud in waste in a single department - the department of education.
Yep, we want the gov't involved in oversight of business.
Oh! Isn't that the definition of fascism? I'm sure this guy would be one of the first to call GW a fascist, and not realize that the namecaller himself is in support of such things.
7 posted on
07/01/2002 5:36:44 AM PDT by
MrB
To: mhking
Tom Cruise is worried about street crime, he ought to come back to the good ol' US of A, where street crime is a third of the level in the UK. Just recently, his neighbor was assaulted in her home and he personally went running after the thieves, who got $140,000 in jewels. Now, what he would've done, if he'd caught up to the thieves is another question, since handguns are outlawed in Britain. I guess he could stare angrily at the thugs.
8 posted on
07/01/2002 7:13:51 AM PDT by
Kermit
To: mhking
Amazing....this FR thread is linked directly
from Drudge.
Hi Matt.
9 posted on
07/06/2002 10:22:12 AM PDT by
jigsaw
To: mhking
It amazes me that this author, as well as many other liberals, have the audacity to blame Bush for the corporate scandals that have taken place. When Bush became president, it's not as if these companies began their dishonest practices. In fact much of this began during the Clinton presidency. Whether liberals understand this or are just using it to hang Bush, the American public and the world as a whole has seemed to accept that Bush is responsible, even though he has been in office for lees than 2 years.
To: mhking
boo hoo... Al Gore was not elected.
To: mhking
GO DRUDGE GO! Shine the light on this punk
To: mhking
Blah, blah, blah. It's nice they let the mentally challenged become journalists.
14 posted on
07/06/2002 11:05:52 AM PDT by
akaBozo
To: mhking
...the US looks more and more to be a long way away from the rest of the world.YEP!!! Far out in front and adding distance daily!!!
To: mhking
The author of this is so ignorant that I feel pity for him. He appears to get whatever political knowledge he thinks he has from some combination of comic strips, rock songs, and celebrity interviews. He didn't even make an actual discernible point in this article. It's clear that he sure does fancy himself quite the clever wordsmith, however.
Not worth the time I've already wasted on it.
To: mhking; All
To: mhking
This "hit piece" is the sort of thing we have come to expect form those "left wing euro-trash pin heads".
To: mhking
34 posted on
07/06/2002 12:21:04 PM PDT by
lodwick
To: mhking
Here's my reply to Brucie-Boy sent today after first becoming aware of what he's written and then his defense:
F*** you! How's that for an invective?
Generally we like the Aussies, because they're not pansies, but you give them a bad name. We don't sit around all day rubbing our hands about your president; we're too busy trying to create more wealth for you to consume off of our backs.
I think the real problem with you is that you're a Socialist and your ideas have been proven wrong again and again, but then empirical evidence doesn't matter to those baptized into a religion of feelings rather than results. You Socialists are far worse than red-necks. At least red-necks pull their own weight. (Gee, I wonder if the whole continent of Australia wouldn't be considered red-neck country). I'd watch who you pick a fight with Brucie-boy.
Love and kisses, Aussie-b****,
Clark
New York, New York, USA
39 posted on
07/06/2002 1:27:10 PM PDT by
clarkca
To: mhking
To: mhking
58 posted on
07/06/2002 4:40:37 PM PDT by
NapaCA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson