Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A FReeper buddy sent this to me. Pretty interesting data to say the least. Glad I'm retiring in 5 years!
1 posted on 06/27/2002 10:58:38 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: PeterPrinciple
flagging
2 posted on 06/27/2002 10:59:51 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
I'm only 28, so this doesn't apply^:)
3 posted on 06/27/2002 11:00:57 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Jesus Christ! I'm already dead and nobody's told me.
4 posted on 06/27/2002 11:01:49 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Bunk. I don't believe this data for a second. Quite the opposite.
6 posted on 06/27/2002 11:17:22 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
The control group does not have retirees from other industries. All the retirees in this study are from Boeing Aerospace.
The conclusion should say "For every year worked beyond age 55, Boeing Aerospace retirees lose two years of life span."
9 posted on 06/27/2002 11:23:14 PM PDT by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Oh, what are "reitrees" of Boeing Aerospace (see caption). The correlation is too smooth and too drastic. It looks like a hoax.
12 posted on 06/27/2002 11:27:36 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
I've always thought retirement was lethal. Take a look at the statistics. Retired people die at a much, much higher rate than non-retireds.
13 posted on 06/27/2002 11:29:21 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
For some odd reason I'd always considered that working for its own sake mattered, too.
16 posted on 06/27/2002 11:43:23 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Hey, I'm only a vegetable, a lowly vegetable, but I know this...

This is absolute Crapola from a first grade mind. Any who have studied even the basics of stat know that an absolute 45 degree correlation (which this portrays), is pure fantasy on the part of the idiot who put this thing together.

This is exactly the type of ByullSheetStatistics that snake oil pollsters put together to further the likes of a Clinton or GoreWhore.

It takes more than a couple of weeks at a seminar for polling to learn the mathematical aspects of statistics and probabilities.

However, one FACTOR is always present these days for the party of Liars, that of the statistics being " SKEWED "...

Simply put, you cannot trust any silly simplistic poll put out by anyone anymore, if you do not know the minimum number of samples required for a T, Chi(square), or normal distribution.

Even if you do know the basics of random sampling, the difference between possibilities and probabilities is damn sure not known by the average semi-literate American citizen....

Example...." I, the math Vegetable, say that the Sun will rise tomorrow", (this one regardless of which horizon)...

Is this statement a (1)Fact, a (2)Prediction, a (3)Probability, a (4)Possibility, or just (5)a whimsy of Fantasy on the part of the author?

Are you, the "American People " going to yell "That's not fair!!", or are some, plenty, or all of you going to do the homework (if you do not already know the answer), and give a researched, scholastically sound answer?

Please respond, for I am going to plan my future growth on the answers.....
19 posted on 06/28/2002 12:55:03 AM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
As President Reagan used to say:

"It’s true, hard work never killed anybody, but I figure, why take the chance?"

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

27 posted on 06/28/2002 5:43:49 AM PDT by mikeb704
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Nothing here to indicate the income levels of each retirement age which might be enlightening
31 posted on 06/28/2002 6:06:47 AM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
If I follow the math on this one, logic says that if you work until you are 68, you will die at age 63.
36 posted on 06/28/2002 6:42:30 AM PDT by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
It might just be the engineer in me, overanalyzing this, but the curve looks a little hokey.

I believe it is just a sinusoidal equation superimposed upon a linear equation. And I have heard about this being presented before as a Rockwell study. (yea. I know Rockwell is Boeing now)

Of course, starting that lama ranch in Wyoming is sounding better.

38 posted on 06/28/2002 7:07:11 AM PDT by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jonx6
ping
39 posted on 06/28/2002 7:10:12 AM PDT by TXFireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
While the data is so selective as to be worthless, it does raise an interesting question. I'm also aware that minorities (in particular black males) have a shorter lifespan (for as yet undetermined reasons). It would be interesting to see what the net effect of retirement at age factored by race, income level, and location.

One possible use of this would be to mount an arguement for private retirement accounts because the "system" is so biased against anyone reaching retirement age.

Another possible use would be to mount an effort to reduce the retirement age for minorities or others who are "disadvantaged"

This can easily be a double edged sword.

40 posted on 06/28/2002 7:46:31 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
so when are you going to do a Martha cartoon ?

I think one of bill, hill and martha having tea together with the caption being "I sell pardons, I trade cattle futures, I do insider trading" would be great.

42 posted on 06/28/2002 8:26:45 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Gasp!! You have spilled the beans concerning how Social Security and pension plans manage to survive (sort of)!! Be very afraid -- and sleep with one eye open..... 8~)
46 posted on 06/28/2002 8:43:03 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
More proof that there are lies damn lies and statistics. According to this my grandmother should have been dead 7 years ago, she just turned 73 and is not even contemplating retirement.
49 posted on 06/28/2002 8:49:35 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Tell it to Strom Thurmond.
50 posted on 06/28/2002 8:49:39 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Lessee--two years lost for every year worked after 55. Now my grandpa worked until he was 84 (he owned the company so they couldn't retire him :-) ). So if he quit at 55 he would have lived to.... cgbg scrambles for calculator.... (2 x (84-55)) + 55 = 113???

Huh??
55 posted on 06/28/2002 9:01:26 AM PDT by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson