Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anatomy Of A Murder: Westerfield vs. Van Dams (A Mother's Story)
San Diego Online ^ | June 27, 2002 | Kevin Cox

Posted on 06/27/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-719 next last
To: spectre
Are you serious? It was a slip of the tongue...
81 posted on 06/27/2002 10:54:08 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

suprise = surprise
82 posted on 06/27/2002 10:55:26 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"has admitted to the police that he was solely and personally responsible for downloading, categorizing and maintaining the images,"

Or at least that's what the police say. Who really knows? Police have been known to get, shall we say, creative about what goes in their police reports.

83 posted on 06/27/2002 10:57:00 AM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Not so fast----

The sparklies are important. I've had sparkly chips on my skin. They are sometimes very difficult to get off of the skin, they stick real good. Soap and water will remove most of them. However, I've had to pick them off of my skin anyway.
What if Danielle did have a bath that Friday night. What if Damon told her to bath and then get into bed. She might have, picked up more fibers from their bath towels, sparklies removed, wet hair not combed and knotted more. Then more fresh fibers from froggie, blanket, and mom.....Maybe their was more that happed when mom went to clothes her door.....
84 posted on 06/27/2002 10:59:39 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Where are you able to watch this? I'm not getting any feed from the nbcsandiego site.
85 posted on 06/27/2002 11:00:13 AM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
close-not clothes.
86 posted on 06/27/2002 11:03:26 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm coming to your house for dinner!!!!! Sounds great.
87 posted on 06/27/2002 11:07:13 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
He'd asked to get them sequestered before and was denied.
88 posted on 06/27/2002 11:08:42 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
rofl! Go here,
http://www.websleuths.com/dcf/DCForumID4/756.html

Scroll down to #13 and then read #29!!

89 posted on 06/27/2002 11:09:26 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: vacrn; juzcuz; ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm getting it LIVE on Court TV and if the Jury that is not supposed to be watching TV was watching Nancy Grace and company this morning, WESTERFIELD is toast.

"juzcuz" I do agree that the sparkles are a vital part of the investigation. They just stick to everything...for days.

Kim, it wasn't even a slip of the tongue, by Dusek...it was a deliberate and direct point that the Jury IS influenced by what the TV media is reporting...{if Feldman got his way about what he was asking for}

Judge Mudd said "they better not be watching"...

SEQUESTER THE JURY!@!!!

sw

90 posted on 06/27/2002 11:10:04 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Depends on what kind of sparklies. If it was glued on glitter, it would fall off. If it was woven into the fabric, less likely. Or if it was actually sequins and beads.
91 posted on 06/27/2002 11:11:39 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Obviously Brenda was listening to Rick Roberts. Probably watched trial coverage, too, to see if television really does make you look fat.

Dusek indicated that some of the jurors might be watching the televised hearing, so that means he probably thinks they frequently IGNORE the judge's ruling and repeated admonishments to the contrary. If jurors hear only what the tv reporters analyze, they'd think their ears deceived them in court and these reporters, these professionals, must have better powers of interpreting testimony than they, common Joe and Jane Q. Public, probably do.

With a man's life hanging in the balance, I'd think a judge would want to take every precaution to avoid prejudicing the jury, not just hope they play by the rules when they get back home again at night.

92 posted on 06/27/2002 11:13:49 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
I think that was referrin to DW's taped interview, and if it was, I have to ask was it introduced to the jury by dusek and if not..why?
93 posted on 06/27/2002 11:13:51 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; All
People in the mean alleys and smoky dives of the Brooklyn waterfront know that a sock or small bag filled with sand makes a fearsome weapon, all the better because it leaves no marks. Thus the verb "to sandbag," which since around 1887 has meant "to fell with a blow from a sandbag," or just generally "to bully or intimidate."

The specific "hang back" or "slack off" sense of "sandbag" you're wondering about comes from poker, where it originally described a player who held off raising the stakes in order to lull the other players into a false sense of security. The poker sandbagger would pounce late in the game, clobbering the other players with his good hand. More generally, "sandbag" has come to mean to under perform any task in order to gain some advantage.

Source: The Word Detective by Evan Morris
94 posted on 06/27/2002 11:14:00 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
courttv
95 posted on 06/27/2002 11:15:18 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: spectre
That's a bunch of hooey... they should have been sequestered from the beginning..NOT in the middle of the game. That actual request is so conveniant for the defense to scream for now.
96 posted on 06/27/2002 11:19:57 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Dusek made the case that Feldman presented, for sequestering the jury.

Either Sequester the Jury, or place a gag order on Court TV...(I can dream).

sw

97 posted on 06/27/2002 11:20:57 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Yes kind is important---

Police investigator on the carpet found "fallen" sparklies on the carpet could they have been the loose type? Not the woven. It was a two piece outfit-shirt and pant???? I know that sewn sequined and beaded outfits are very expensive...
98 posted on 06/27/2002 11:21:11 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: bvw
That was a neat reading bvw, thanks! I'm bookmarking that website too.
99 posted on 06/27/2002 11:21:43 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The Defense has asked for it since day one.

Don't you want DW to get a fair trial, Kim?

100 posted on 06/27/2002 11:24:24 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-719 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson