Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9TH CIRCUIT COURT: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Fox News ^

Posted on 06/26/2002 11:25:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

UNBELIEVABLE. BREAKING ON FOX: SF APPEALS COURT SAYS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ENDORSES RELIGION, AND IS THEREBY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Hawaii; US: Idaho; US: Montana; US: Nevada; US: Oregon; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuitcourt; michaeldobbs; pledgeofallegiance; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,461-1,477 next last
To: AmishDude
Why does a set of communist beliefs have more rights than a set of Christian beliefs?

"So that we can prove we're better than the Nazis."




461 posted on 06/26/2002 12:37:16 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: phasma proeliator
It's not just you, tpaine enjoys being the NOID
462 posted on 06/26/2002 12:37:37 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Thanks for the Correction .. the red is MUCH better
463 posted on 06/26/2002 12:37:50 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: phasma proeliator; tpaine
tpaine, is it just me, or are you being an ass again?

It's not you, he's a perpetual malcontent.

464 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:06 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
What about the above reasoning do you find unbelievable?

One flaw is that something as significant as the Pledge of Allegiance to Our Nation, has a legal weight comparable to a Constitutional amendment -- in other words it is INVIOLABLE BY ANY COURT. It is a PLEDGE taken under free will and has no true legal ramifications -- only moral ones.

Nonsense. The Constitution is the law of the land. The pledge has no legal standing as law. The court did not address the wording of the pledge in the abstract (which you would think by the irrational responses posted here), it addressed the case of an agent of the state reciting it in a public institution.

A PLEDGE is like a ethical contract, designed by the author in TERMS HE DETERMINES FIT.

So? That's fine for the author. It is not fine for a teacher leading a class in a state school.

I do not support mandatory pledges.

Then you agree with the court?

I am also meta-agnostic (I dont understand what I mean by God), but this ruling brings me more sadness and anger than the events of 9-11.

Absurdity. Get a grip.

If I had a flag I would burn it right now, this ruling symbolically marks the spiritual death of a nation, and I will not recognise this zombie-America as my own.

Anyone who blames this on 'three silly judges' is willfully blind to the maggots on her corpse.

465 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:11 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Viva Le Dissention
Kids have a right in a public school not to be endoctrinated on the subject of religion

I'm sorry - you mean to tell me that the inclusion of two words - "under God" - means that schools are endoctrinating religion!? Would you kindly tell me what religion that they are promoting? I would insist that most (if not all) religions have a single God (or god, if you insist) at the head of whatever pantheon that is central to their belief structure. The pledge acknowleges that fact, by not singling out the Christian nor Jewish nor Islamic nor any other perception of God.

I would say that this father is wrong to impose his beliefs on the masses.

In the Florida case (which the father lost by the way), the school offered the opportunity for his child to step out of the room or otherwise be excused from saying the pledge. The father insisted that this was not good enough, because his child should not have to listen to others recite the pledge in school. Hence his decision to move across the country and to bring his suit in a different court.

466 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:23 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: CecilRhodesGhost
No he doesn't. He's fighting the establishment of Atheism as the official religion of state with every fiber of his being.
467 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:32 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
And if appealed, I am not sure with Justice Souter and O'Connor we are going to see a reversal.

IT WAS REMANDED = not going to Supreme Court. (At least not now).

468 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:37 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
FYI, these are federal judges. There is no mechanism to recall them.

Chief Justice Rose Bird was on the state Supreme Court.

469 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:43 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
The ninth Circus court of appeals has had more cases overturned than all others combined. Red Skelton predicted this years ago.
470 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:53 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Another great moment in American jurisprudence from the Ninth Circuit.
471 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:59 PM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Does this decision send a good message to our troops engaged in a war? Same kind of crap our military put up with while fighting in Viet Nam. While they are risking their lives, some arrogant bast***s are undermining our country's values and security. Great to be politically correct unless you are under fire. We are literally fighting for our survival against those who are more than willing to die for their God (Allah). This ruling will not be allowed to stand...
472 posted on 06/26/2002 12:38:59 PM PDT by fuzzthatwuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I was driving in my car when I first heard this and the howl on FR drowned out my radio.
473 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:01 PM PDT by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Yeah well for your information...they were talking about the Government having ONE ESTABLISHED RELIGION....they did not ever say that God should not be included in Government. In fact JUST THE OPPOSITE....the Founding Fathers had a lot to say about GOD....read the papers they wrote! Get your facts straight
474 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:07 PM PDT by Lucas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Not surprised by the ruling--the 9th Circuit is as depraved and twisted as the city it's based in. That ruling will be thrown out by the Supremes--looking forward to it.
475 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:09 PM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
Howdy

Not so fast, you're among like minded believers in America here, it is not time to give up the battle and leave the greatest hope for mankind in the hands of the moronic liberal tin foil hat wearing barbarians that are so unable to apply their miniscule intellects constructively that such an insane decision as this can be handed down during a war.

The discussion should center on what response should be made to this disgusting ruling.

I'd say it is not time yet for violent confrontation against these sixties era relics, I think that impeachment is the way to go. These sixth jerkuit schlameels MUST be removed by impeachment and the process has GOT to start NOW, we should be looking for a high profile person to head the effort.

Any suggestions people?

476 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:10 PM PDT by MoscowMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
"Congress shall make no Law respecting the Establishment of Religion, or prohibiting the free Exercise thereof;" 141

Now you know why the left operates through the courts.

Looks to me like the definition of 'conservative' just earned a greater scrutiny.

477 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:20 PM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
Satan finishes the press release by announcing the efforts to reclaim the House of Representatives and finish off the country by getting Hillary Rodham Clinton elected president.

[LOL] I love it!

478 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:21 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Viva Le Dissention
I agree with you that this judge should be able to remain outside the loud and angry voices. His role is to be insulated and above criticism by the masses. There shouldn't be any political pressure on judges.
479 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:35 PM PDT by CecilRhodesGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for the Correction ..

An addition. People may have missed it.

480 posted on 06/26/2002 12:39:41 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,461-1,477 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson