Posted on 06/25/2002 1:28:51 PM PDT by Frapster
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
BALTIMORE -- As Morgan State University President Earl S. Richardson surveyed the sea of newly minted graduates at the school's 126th commencement last month, his joy was tempered by a question that has grown too conspicuous to ignore: Where are all the men?
Not only were the head of student government, the senior class president and 96 of Morgan's 141 honorstudents women, but so were two-thirds of the university's 860 graduates.
Click here to read the entire article.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Come to think of it, pretty much the story of our last fifty years.
The REAL problem is that some time within the last half-century, we lost sight of mass higher education as it was originally intended--to prepare one for LIFE in a Free Republic--and replaced it with this attitude of "college as trade school." That is, we began to see it solely as a means for making more money.
I disagree with your premise. If you have the PROPER higher education--bereft of things like "gender studies" and "multiculturalism", and filled with the traditional arts and sciences, language, literature, history, sociology, etc.--it makes you a SIGNIFICANTLY better individual.
Your attitude is one I have studiously attempted to dissuade my own twenty-something offspring from taking.
I was fortunate to have parents who wanted a liberal arts education for me. I learned a great deal, and then went on to earn an engineering degree as well.
As a result I think I have a far better grasp of the very issues that we discuss on FR than I would otherwise.
If you subsidize something (affirmative action for females & minorities), you get more of it. If you regulate something (reverse discrimination for white males), you get less of it.
So, more female college graduates, and fewer male graduates.
VOICE OF ALGORE: "Good! Good!"
VOICE OF HILLARY CLINTON: "Yes, exactly as we planned it!"
VOICE OF BILL CLINTON: "Huhuh, these are the people ah counted on to help me stay in office durin' impeachment. Thur the ones who consistently said that they didn' care about no Constitution 'r rule o' law, as long as the economy was good!"
VOICE OF DICK GEPHARDT: "Our master plan is nearly complete. Now, not only are all the stupid MINORITIES too ignorant to figure out the scam we're playing, but now even the WHITE folks are going to fall in line."
VOICE OF TOM DASCHLE: "EVERYONE will be stupid and happy, and ready to let us take care of every aspect of their lives! Yes, the Founders were clever, but not clever enough by half!"
VOICE OF TED KENNEDY: "Soon, the lahst vestiges of a well-educated popu-lace will be swept away, and this silly 'Ree-public' that those dead white men established will become OU-AH EMPI-AH!!!!"
VOICE OF JIM JEFFORDS (Putting arm around Daschle's shoulders): "Man, I'm sure glad I decided to tag along with you folks!"
[ALL: WICKED, BREATHLESS LAUGHTER]
[CURTAINS]
A CS degree can leave you in a moderate (not high) paying coding job forever.
This week I've spoken with two very wealthy guys, neither of whom has a degree and both of whom are entrepreneurs (actually former grease monkey mechanics).
I have liberal arts degree and am in a highly technical position.
College degrees aren't meal tickets, nor do they permanently determine the career choices or financial prospects of students who are barely out of their teens.
Students should study what they like and what interests them, regardless of the presumed "practicality" of that interest. IMHO, discovering what interests you is the only purpose of higher education.
Dom't bee cornfuzed...yew halve it rite.
FMCDH
Heck, I worked a minimum wage job after college. Not a lot of employers are terribly enthusiastic about a liberal arts bachelors degree.
But if students spend their time sharpening their minds in college, they'll thrive in a work environment and quickly leave minimum wage behind. The majority of that burden is on the college grad himself. Not the college.
While I am no Rhodes Scholar I would agree that the elitist mentality of the "well educated" cracks me up. Particularly the notion that the females who attend college are significantly more educated than their mail counterparts. Regardless of the gender of the so called "educated" it's my understanding that our educational systesm are full of teachers who have knowledge issues to the point of the absurd at times.
Don't you ever long for the true liberal arts education of, say, the 1700's? The kind that produced thinkers like our founders?
But even then, I learned the smell of cr*p, and can still discern it to this day.
And YOUR attitude is one I've studiously attempted to avoid throughout my undergraduate and graduate school careers, dude-- namely, assuming that I am automatically more enlightened about anything than anyone with less education than I.
Since you have 20-something offspring, I'm assuming that you're old enough to be my father (Gawd-forbid... Bwahaha...) and thus was educated in the sixties, perhaps before or despite the onset of mass intellectual stagnation and rot that gripped academe during that time... An education today means a hell of alot less than it meant 20, 40 years ago. Nobody understands that better than I, completing my doctorate in physics at a time when the degree merely shadows the breadth and depth it had at the beginning of last century...
No I didn't get bogged down with "gender studies" and crap like that; I actually had a rather decent liberal arts education, as far as that goes... Being a hard-a$$ science geek, however, I tend to attribute less importance to Homer et al. than to, say, Newton and Dirac...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.