To: SlickWillard
BUMP
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
Forsooth!
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
"No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar." How refreshing. A gentleman, and a scholar.
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
So I think we've made some significant progress here in understanding just how important a close look at language can be in establishing authorship, rather than just depending on title page attributions I hope he takes this in view in good stride as well. Stylometrics can establish a few things. Stylometrics will not account for deviations.
10 posted on
06/25/2002 12:35:34 PM PDT by
cornelis
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
They've been desperately looking for some post-1604 hook on which to hang their Shakespeare hat The regular academic trick is to produce scholarship with ulterior motives. Why do they need a post-1604 peg?
12 posted on
06/25/2002 12:39:50 PM PDT by
cornelis
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
"recant" is entirely the wrong word to use here.
13 posted on
06/25/2002 12:41:49 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras
It was not to be.
14 posted on
06/25/2002 12:43:17 PM PDT by
Consort
To: pokerbuddy0; Badabing Badaboom; aristeides; Betty Jo
The one and only Don Foster here to.
16 posted on
06/18/2003 5:23:04 PM PDT by
Shermy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson