Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hair in Westerfield home similar to Danielle's: (6-25-2002 Van Dam vs. Westerfield Trial Coverage)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | June 25, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 06/25/2002 9:30:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Hair in Westerfield home similar to Danielle's

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- A police criminalist testified Monday that tiny pieces of evidence ---- hairs and carpet fibers ---- found in David Westerfield's house and motor home could link the Sabre Springs man to Danielle van Dam, the 7-year-old neighbor he is accused of kidnapping and murdering.

Tanya DuLaney, a trace evidence analyst with the San Diego Police Department, said blonde hairs, dog hairs and tan carpet fibers found on Westerfield's property were similar to Danielle's hair, the short brown-gray fur of the van Dam family dog and Danielle's bedroom carpet.


DuLaney said she could not make a 100 percent match of the hair and fiber evidence.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping and murdering Danielle. The young girl was reported missing Feb. 2. Her nude and decomposing body was found nearly four weeks later in rural East County.

Westerfield, a twice-divorced design engineer, kept his hands clasped in front of him during Monday's proceedings, occasionally writing notes and consulting with his attorneys.

Danielle's mother, Brenda van Dam, attended the entire hearing. The van Dams live two doors down the street from Westerfield and were passing acquaintances with him. Damon van Dam sat with his wife during the morning session.

Day 12 of Westerfield's trial was dominated by the hair and fiber testimony of DuLaney, who told jurors that light brown-blonde hairs found in Westerfield's motor home and house were similar to Danielle's hair in color, length, diameter. Westerfield has short, dark hair.

Jurors heard testimony that DNA evidence will show Danielle could have left the blonde hairs found on sheets and pillow cases taken from Westerfield's master bedroom ---- the first possible evidence placing the second-grader upstairs in his home.

"They could have come from Danielle van Dam," DuLaney said of tests performed on the hairs. "All six of them."

Further testimony on the hair samples is expected today or later this week when prosecutors are expected to wrap up their side of the case.

Meanwhile, Westerfield's defense attorney, Steven Feldman, focused on what didn't match, having DuLaney go over hair after hair found in the motor home ---- some brown and others color-treated blonde ---- which were determined not to be Danielle's because of color, length or dye.

Earlier in the trial, Brenda van Dam testified her daughter's hair was never dyed and Danielle had a haircut about a week before she disappeared. Van Dam also had testified she took Danielle to Westerfield's house to sell Girl Scout cookies a few days before Danielle disappeared. She testified her daughter went into the house briefly, but did not go upstairs.

The tedium of the fiber and hair testimony prompted Judge William Mudd to give jurors an extra long afternoon break.

Feldman followed the same line of questioning with the carpet fibers, asking about fibers that didn't match. He called attention to a lack of physical evidence putting Danielle in Westerfield's black Toyota 4Runner, the car Westerfield drove when he went to get his motor home on Feb. 2 ---- the morning Danielle was discovered missing.

None of Danielle's hair or blood was found in the vehicle, another police criminalist, David Cornacchia, testified. Nor were any of the carpet fibers lifted from the soles of Westerfield's 25 pairs of shoes similar to Danielle's bedroom carpet, DuLaney said.

Also on Monday, DuLaney told jurors about finding five carpet fibers in Westerfield's motor home that were similar in size and shape to Danielle's bedroom carpet.

She showed jurors enlarged pictures, showing the fibers side by side with those from Danielle's bedroom and magnified 400 times, to illustrate how the fibers were consistent.

Under questioning from Feldman, Westerfield's defense attorney, DuLaney said it was possible that many houses in a development like the Sabre Springs neighborhood where the van Dams and Westerfield lived could have the same carpet.

She also talked about dog hairs found in dryer lint thrown away in Westerfield's garage. More hair was found in the hallway carpet of his motor home, on a bath mat in the motor home and on a white towel. Those hairs were consistent with the hair on van Dam's dog, Leyla, DuLaney testified. Westerfield does not have a dog.

Brenda van Dam testified earlier in the trial that her daughter would often roll around with Leyla, especially after she had changed into her pajamas before going to bed.

While the dog hair found in Westerfield's house and motor home had the unusual pigment formations found in Leyla's hair, DuLaney said she could only say the hairs were similar, not exact matches.

Attempts to perform DNA tests on the hair were unsuccessful, said Holly Ernest, director of the UC Davis veterinary genetics lab. She briefly testified that there was not enough DNA on the dog hair sent to the university for testing to determine whether it belonged to Leyla.

Feldman did not ask Ernest any questions.

Testimony in the case continues today.

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

6/25/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 901-906 next last
To: NautiNurse
LOL I'm sure the jury rolled their eyes on that one..
161 posted on 06/25/2002 12:11:20 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA

In the interests of justice and truth, I have to sometime wonder why the prosecution is not obligated to turn over to the defense, exculpatory evidence. For example, the prosecution was not exactly forthcoming with some of the sliding glass door fingerprint evidence and the .22 shell evidence.


162 posted on 06/25/2002 12:11:38 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBlueJon
Good question! She said that the fibers looked deteriated..but didn't say of the colors faded either by sun or chemicals..I don't think.
163 posted on 06/25/2002 12:12:16 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: BigBlueJon
I was wondering something similar....could the orange fibers be faded enough from laundry and the elements to look similar to mauve carpet like the VD's?..missed too much of testimony to know if that is not possible.
164 posted on 06/25/2002 12:13:19 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Not if her mom hugged her before she left that evening.
165 posted on 06/25/2002 12:13:29 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: pyx
The defense certainly was given the .22 evidence, else how could they have brought it up? Same for all the other evidence.

There have been zero requests for, therefore zero given, sanctions on the prosecution for discovery violation.

166 posted on 06/25/2002 12:14:41 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Trust me on this, Kim. Acrylic doesn't fade.
167 posted on 06/25/2002 12:14:48 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Maybe the inside of a jacket could be microscopically damaged, but not visible to the naked eye?
168 posted on 06/25/2002 12:14:51 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: BigBlueJon
Excellent question! In San Diego, I would think an afternoon or two could be sufficient for fading, say, in a sun baked windshield or such.
169 posted on 06/25/2002 12:15:04 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
His carpet is not orange.
170 posted on 06/25/2002 12:15:05 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: All
Why does it seem that Feldman is pointing to the body as having been placed there sometime between the 16th and 18th - but he doesn't seem to be pointing to Damon as having anything to do with it - we all know when Damon did his search - but the jury doesn't - do you think Feldman will be able to bring that up?
171 posted on 06/25/2002 12:15:14 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Ok..I would assume that cotton does..what else?
172 posted on 06/25/2002 12:16:00 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
but they still could have tested the fibers from the inside of the jacket for similarity - they probably don't match.
173 posted on 06/25/2002 12:17:05 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
The witness seemed very firm that it was orange fiber. I don't believe even Feldman disputed this.
174 posted on 06/25/2002 12:17:39 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
You are correct about polyester fibers usually not being staple. Acrylic, on the other hand, is almost always a staple fiber and crimpled so that is has a soft feel and appearance like wool. 1.5-3.0 inches would be very common for acrylic fibers.
175 posted on 06/25/2002 12:18:01 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Well, see, I did miss a bunch....thought the orange was carpet fiber....where did the orange fiber some from?...is that why she spent 2 days trying to match the afghan to the fiber, but didn't....do we know yet what the orange fiber is from?.
176 posted on 06/25/2002 12:18:12 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
What does "staple" mean?
177 posted on 06/25/2002 12:18:43 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Not if her mom hugged her before she left that evening.

Did Danielle take a shower/bath before going to bed that night? If so, BVD's red sweater fibers shouldn't be present.

178 posted on 06/25/2002 12:19:08 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It was just a thought. I still believe that BVD had something going on with DW. Not too far-fetched. BVD plays/gives hugs to Danielle sometime before going out to "girls' night out". BVD and DW later on are rolling around in the MH. Lots of fiber transference going on. Danielle's body, having red fibers on her necklace, is exposed to elements/sun and fibers get dis-colored.
179 posted on 06/25/2002 12:19:39 PM PDT by BigBlueJon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: It's me
I keep thinking of those hunters jackets and pants that are bright orange so they do not get shot by accident..does anyone know if the bullet that was in the girls bedroom could have been from a hunting rifle?
180 posted on 06/25/2002 12:19:39 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 901-906 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson