Related Publications in the LAT/WP vs Free Republic Settlement Agreement

Free Republic LAT/WP Settlement Agreement ^ | 06/24/02 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

As part of our settlement with the LAT/WP, we have agreed to post only short excerpts and links from the following LAT/WP related publications:

Page 13: Tribune Company, basically anything published by the Chicago Tribune or subsidiaries or related companies.

Page 14: Tribune Broadcasting and Television.

Page 15: Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Sun, Hartford Courant, News Day.

Page 16: Times Mirror companies.

Page 17: (blank page).

Page 18: The Washington Post, The Daily Herald Company, The Gazette Newspapers.

Page 19: Legislate, Newsweek, Post Newsweek Companies.

[GretchenEE]

bump

[JudyB1938]

Thank you for pinging me. I appreciate it.

[snopercod]

Orlando Sentinel? No more Charley Reese...

[snopercod]

We don't need no steeenkeeng Pacer account!

(Say, this tangled web is looks an awful lot like the Enron org chart:

TRIBUNE COMPANY

Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc.
Diana-Quentin, Inc.
Tribune Finance Service Center, Inc.
New River Center Maintenance Association, Inc.
Tribune Publishing Company
Tribune Media Net, Inc.
Tribune Media Services, Inc.
Premier DataVision, Inc.
JDTV, Inc.
TMS Acquisition Corp;
Tribune Acquisition Corp.
Tribune National Marketing Company
Chicago Tribune Company
Chicago Avenue Construction Company
Tribune Direct Marketing, Inc.
Chicago Tribune Press Service, Inc.
Chicago Tribune Newspapers, Inc.
Newspaper Readers Agency, Inc.
Relcon, Inc.
Sun-Sentinel Company
Gold Coast Publications, Inc.
Forum Publishing Group, Inc.
Orlando Sentinel Communications Company
NEOCOMM, Inc.
Sentinel Communications News Ventures, Inc.
The Daily Press, Inc.
Tribune Interactive, Inc.
BlackVoices.Com Inc.

[snopercod]

Gotta' go to work now. Somebody else key in the rest, please, and make sure Alamo-Girl gets a copy.

[Abundy]

Gosh - Look at how many media outlets actually comprise the LATimes and the Compost...So much for a free press. Do you think the Founders ever envisioned a press conglomerate such as we see today?

A few individuals control the media - which allows them to control what information us "common folk" have access to and to spin that which they allow us to see in any manner they want.

Sure do wish this had gone all the way to SCOTUS.

[Snow Bunny]

Thanks John.

God bless you JimRob

[Chairman_December_19th_Society]

Only liberal communistic rags would seek to shield themselves from the light of the truth.

So they get a little less free publicity. Their loss.

Thanks for the info.

[MeekOneGOP]

Hey, John! I thought the issue was simply from TWO companies: LAT & WP.
I had NO idea it was from a mega-list like in those links there.
Fortunately for me, I didn't see The Dallas Morning News amongst that mess!
I post a lot of their stuff.

[Jackie]

You will find a compilation of the latest Associated Press articles here (news, sports, business, politics, tech, photos, everything):

http://wire.ap.org/APnews/?SITE=7219&FRONTID=HOME

[MeekOneGOP]

As part of our settlement with the LAT/WP, we have agreed
to post only short excerpts and links from the following
LAT/WP related publications: [See the links in main article]

Pardon any double-pings here........

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.

[xzins]

Is there any way to have the "preview" button put up a "red flag" whenever one of their many publications is used? It sounds like a long list, and you already have the preview set up to flag on missing items. Can it flag on inappropriate sources?

[RedWing9]

FYI

sorry if you've already seen this, I'm just cut&pasting...

[lonestar]

I miss Socks C. Very phunny cat.

[brityank]

...So much for a free press. Do you think the Founders ever envisioned a press conglomerate such as we see today?

Have you guys followed the WorldNetDaily.com problems of their trying to get access to the feral government press briefings? Thanks to the interlocking directorships, corporate 'standing' as a Man in courts, and the egregious tax policies foisted on US by the bureaucracy ~ we now have a fee press.

A few individuals control the media - which allows them to control what information us "common folk" have access to and to spin that which they allow us to see in any manner they want.

As you know, the founders felt so strongly about that; they enshrined it in the first Amendment. If you've read many of the British newslinks, they often start with the phrase "... it can now be revealed ... or some such verbiage ~ indicating the 'approval' of some government agency to report the story. Political news and discussion belong to the People, not the corporations and their minions.

I also have no doubt, that in this present clime and with this group; SCOTUS either would not have granted cert, or you would get a very narrow decision against FR's position.

Thank, Jim ~ keep on keepin' on.

[b4its2late]

Bookmarked..........

[Illbay]

Are there any more far-reaching implications?

[Illbay]

Hey, is Socks C. still around?

[Phil V.]

Yes. He's still around, but . . .

[Registered]

Running an article through Babelfish a few times might do it.

I suggest running the articles through this.

as an example, this: Running an article through Babelfish a few times might do it.

can becomes this: Runnin' an article through Babe'fish a few times might does it. (Redneck)

or this: Runnin' an article drough Babelfish some few times might do it. Man! (Jive)

or this: Wunning an awticwe thwough Babewfish a few times might do it.(Fudd)

or this: Roonneeng un erteecle-a thruoogh Bebelffeesh a foo teemes meeght du it. Um de hur de hur de hur. (Swedish Chef)

or this:Unningray anyay articleyay oughthray Abelfishbay ayay ewfay imestay ightmay oday ityay.(Igpay Atinlay)

or this: RUNNING AZN ARTICLE THrOUGH BABELFISSH 4 F3W TIMES MIGHT DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ (Hacker)