Replies

Depends on what the definition of the word "conservative" is.

I assume you know?

I assume you know?

Yes. In simple terms: Goldwater = Conservative.

Bush = Liberal.

I am not certain if the Bush people have thought of this, but it probably wouldn't make any difference if they had. Bush barely eaked by getting elected against the most currupt administration in 225 years. Bill Clinton was a crook, a womanizer, a perjuror, an obstructor of justice, a traitor and a number of other things. Al Gore was his confidant. He participated in or helped cover up everything. Bush didn't even benefit from the "Gerald Ford" effect, the rebelling against someone who was too closely affiliated with a crook.

Now, what happens in 2004? His dad couldn't win two in a row. Bush has alienated at least a portion of his base. Folks, I'm telling you right now that you are living in a dream world if you think Bush is going to skate in 2004. The fact is that liberals will vote for the real liberal, not a liberal lite. And once again the Repbulican party will pander to the liberals and leave their base blowing in the wind because they think they can't not vote for the Republican candidate. I say you have a real problem brewing.

You guys can make fun of us Buchanan supporters all you like. You can call us names, laugh at us because we stood by our ideals in 2000. You can post the actual election numbers and basicly laugh your a--es off, patting each other on the back. The fact is, you've got a problem. We tried to tell you. And now you're going to have to make up the difference between what you got last time, and the rest of the disaffected conservative voters who'll have left your ranks by 2004.

If you think you've seen losses up until now, you wait until Bush pushes through Hillary Care ala Ted Kennedy, and the Medication Prescription addendum. This is going to get ugly. We told you it would, and all you could do is call people names and laugh.

Okay, laugh.