Posted on 06/22/2002 9:46:05 AM PDT by quidnunc
This summer will mark the 47th year since I took my first Republican job: as public relations director for the party in Minnesota. Since then I have rarely strayed from politics, or my party. I served as a staffer to two GOP congressmen, to a GOP governor, as a federal appointee to Richard Nixon and as a corporate executive who supported in Washington and Springfield much, if not all, of the Republican agenda.
You can describe me as a conservative. Thus I am qualified to say that although I dearly love conservatives, they tend to be querulous, disagreeable and threaten revolt when Republican office-holders don't please them. So it is now with George W. Bush. Here is a president who has surprised us all with the firmness and resolve he showed after 9/11. I must tell you I voted for him with less enthusiasm than I had for many of his predecessors. But his administration has pleased me often most notably on two issues: defense of America and social policy.
Yet, Bush has to get re-elected in a country that is evenly divided on philosophy. Thus he must occasionally on matters that sometimes offend conservatives dip into the other side's ideology for support. He has done so on three notable occasions: on the issue of steel protectionism, where he departed his free-market proclamations; on the signing of a campaign finance bill tailored by his enemies, and allowing his attorney general (in the words of Libertarian Nat Hentoff in the Washington Times) "to send disguised agents into religious institutions, libraries and meetings of citizens critical of government policy without a previous complaint, or reason to believe that a crime has been committed."
In a perfect political world, where conservatives are in the majority, these things would be sufficient to encourage a boycott of the polls. Either that or a protest vote for the Democratic opposition. But we are not in a perfect world. We conservatives have a president who didn't receive a majority of the votes, and has one house of Congress against him. He must make compromises to get re-elected. Conservatives who do not understand the nature of politics ought to stay in their air-conditioned ivory towers and refrain from political activity altogether. If they cannot adjudge the stakes in this election and the difference between Bush and an Al Gore or a John Kerry (D-Mass.) or a Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.), they are foolish indeed.
-snip-
To read the remainder of this op/ed open the article via the link provided in the thread's header.
Not really. Ashcroft continued to say that if the government had a "compelling interest" it could regulate and basically infringe upon the right if need be. His opinion mirrors Chuck Schumer's almost to the letter.
He gave us choice because He doesn't want robots. He knew how far our free choice would carry us, however. That is why He also knew that we would need help to make it.
It's a free-fer-all, mostly, but if you stick around long enough, you'll discover certain posters have definite MO's, and your respect/tolerance for those debate techniques often colors your willingness to give their opinions credence. On top of that, we all have our good days and our bad.
Welcome...MUD
No one knows who they are under their normal screen ID's. If you want to retain your membership here, your best bet is probably to follow the rules of the forum as laid out by Jim (and enforced by the mods) and try not to tread on anyone.
Hope this helps.
LOL...ahem, my FRiend, be the honey to the flies.
FReegards...MUD
Of course he does. He has the ban button and is quite liberal with its application. If he squelches dissenting opinions (often) then the direction of the forum is most certainly shaped with his hand.
There are some who inappropriately knock dissent of the Bush Administration policies as "Bush Bashing."
Not all criticism is "bashing."
Truth is Mud, there's about 5-6 RINO`s that you can blame for letting der schlickmeister get away scot-free. Yea, I know impeachment is a black mark, but we had him in our crosshairs and let him get go. I don't remember their names off hand, but they did the nation a serious injustice.
>>>Yes, my FRiend, but without his Conservative base, he may not have even fended off McCain...sure, we need to expand our base, but we can do so while simultaneously championing conservative legislation. Maybe that's what Dubyuh's been planning all along as he signs off on all this Milquetoast Moderate legislation in the short-term...
Bushes conservative base is still hanging tough and for good reason. Most of them know what the alternative is. I watched Mass. Senator John Kerry tonight on a replay of MTP. This guy is very scary Mud. He votes with FatTeddyK, 100% of the time and is a hard core BIG GOV'T liberal. If he ever was elected POTUS, he'd be raising taxes and increasing the federal spending all over the place. Clinton at least understood how to get along with Congressional Republicans, to give the impression he was working for the American people. But I guarantee you, in my best Justin Wilson immitation, if Clinton had a Democrat Congress, things would ahve been alot different Mud. Guaranteed! No bout a-doubt it.
CLAVE-Conservative Libertarians Are Very Enlightened.
Y'all bustin on tpaine better have another look. What may appear rude to you is percieved by others as simply an expression of frustration. If the current Bush dynasty has anything in common with the past Bush adnministration, conservatives better hold onto their wallets. You can read my lips. Fact is, I have ears and won't be reading anybody's lips, but rather, their committment to liberty and our constitution. And when they stray, they'll be reading mine.
Thanks, bud. Just wanted to show this to the others, and see what they think. LOL!
Now I get it. You run the show around here. ROFLMAO
Are you threatening us, Pain? Forgive me if I didn't notice your magic Freeper shield that makes you special and guarded.
I think it's too late to walk on eggshells since the floor is already littered. But you almost had me frightened. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.