Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis warned FBI about OKC bombing? Evidence suggests possible Iraq link
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, June 22, 2002 | By Jon Dougherty

Posted on 06/22/2002 12:22:41 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Saudi Arabian intelligence officials warned the FBI about an Iraqi plot to attack federal facilities in 1995, including the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, according to an Oklahoma lawyer teaming up with a noted Washington, D.C., public-interest law firm.

Mike Johnston, co-counsel for Judicial Watch, said Thursday that on April 19, 1995 – the day of the Oklahoma City bombing – Saudi intelligence alerted CIA officials in Washington, who in turn advised FBI agents at the Washington Metropolitan Field Office.

"Vincent Canastraro, who is the former chief of counter-terrorism for the CIA … called Special Agent Kevin L. Foust and informed him that one of his best sources from Saudi Arabian intelligence specifically advised him that there was a squad of people currently in the United States, very possibly Iraqi, who, and I'm quoting, 'have been tasked with carrying out terrorist acts against the United States,'" Johnston said during an interview on the "Judicial Watch Report" radio program.

"The Saudi informant, who's part of the Saudi counter-terrorism service, told [federal officials] that he had seen the list and that 'first on the list was the federal building in Oklahoma City, Okla.'" Johnston continued.

Johnston said the Saudi agent reported that an Internal Revenue Service building in Houston, Texas, was "second on the list," followed by the FBI's field office in Los Angeles.

The FBI facility was targeted because, according to Johnston, it was the bureau's main counterintelligence operation at that time.

Johnston also said that documents obtained by Judicial Watch show that about a year later, on April 16, 1996, the FBI filed a follow-up report claiming the initial information gleaned from Saudi sources was most likely accurate.

"Even though the government has consistently maintained that no credible evidence exists linking McVeigh to international terrorists," Johnston said, "the FBI generated a follow-up 302 report one year later … where a supervisory special agent, name blacked out, contacted another source regarding the original information from Canastraro."

The special agent "was told that the information was confirmed as generated from a general within the Saudi Arabian Intelligence Service," said Johnston. "The FBI 302 memo went on to conclude that this information appears to have validity, citing Canastraro's former position within the CIA."

An FBI spokeswoman told WorldNetDaily the bureau had no comment on Johnston's allegations. CIA officials could not be reached for comment prior to press time.

When asked why the government did not do more to press McVeigh before his death if he was working for another government, Johnston said such a strategy" was apparently not in the game plan for the Justice Department …"

Johnston says some of his information came from documents ordered sealed by U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch, the presiding judge in McVeigh's initial trial, which took place in Denver, Colo.

He went on to note that Matsch has never lifted the order, though "it’s kind of hard to see how it would affect Tim McVeigh now."

"The federal government continues to seek the maintenance of that sealing order on the basis of privacy concerns," he said.

Johnston's disclosure comes on the heels of a report Wednesday that said the U.S. government was warned before the bombing that Islamic extremists were planning attacks.

Islamic terrorists were planning to "strike inside the U.S. against objects symbolizing the American government in the near future," said one warning memo, according to The Associated Press.

That report did not mention Saudi Arabia, but said only that U.S. officials were tipped by evidence "gathered across the globe from Iran and Syria to the Philippines."

AP said documents show the warnings became progressively more specific as to the time, place and type of attack.

Stephen Jones, McVeigh's attorney, was reportedly upset by the disclosure.

"We specifically asked on the record for all evidence, documents and tangible objects to show whether the government had received a warning of acts of terror against federal buildings. We didn't receive this," he told AP.

As WorldNetDaily reported in March, Johnston and Judicial Watch have filed suit against Iraq, charging that Baghdad masterminded and financed "in whole or in part" the OKC bombing.

Chris Farrell, investigative director for Judicial Watch, told WorldNetDaily that the suit has yet to be served on the Iraqi government, but that it is "trudging along" in its process. He said the suit is being handled "through diplomatic channels" in the State Department, which will hand it off to the Polish government.

The U.S. maintains a section in the Polish Embassy in Baghdad, and will serve the Iraqi government through it, with Polish assistance, Farrell said.

As to whether the U.S. government has responded to reports of the suit, Farrell said, "We haven't heard anything."

McVeigh and accomplice Terry Nichols were eventually charged and convicted for differing roles in connection with the OKC bombing. McVeigh was executed June 11, 2001; Nichols has been sentenced to life in prison, but could face state death penalty charges in Oklahoma.

Johnston, in his radio interview, also said there was some evidence suggesting that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed – a top al-Qaida lieutenant whom federal authorities believe may have masterminded the Sept. 11 attacks – trained Nichols for the OKC bombing in the Philippines.

Mohammed "was not only involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, he was involved in the 1993 World Trade Center attack" as well, Johnston charged. "He was in the Philippines at the same time as Terry Nichols, by the way, in the last trip that he made down there before the Murrah building bombing."

U.S. officials believe Mohammed was also in charge of transferring the funds used by the Sept. 11 hijackers.

"There's lots of links that tie him to 9-11," one government official told AP June 5. "He was intricately involved."

Mohammed is also believed to be an accomplice of Ramzi Yousef, who is currently serving a life sentence in the U.S. for his alleged role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Upon his arrest, Yousef was found in possession of plans to blow up a dozen U.S. airliners. Prosecutors also believe he had planned to crash a plane into the Pentagon.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fredthompson; okcbombing; terrorism; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Nita Nupress
Thank you very much for posting the Fox News interview from the Big Show. It is excellent.

When you have the time from your busy schedule, you always make wonderful contributions in your replies. Keep finding the time when you can to continue doing what you do so well.

21 posted on 06/22/2002 10:17:19 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
Thank you Nita. Excellent find. I appreciate you providing that interview for the forum.

D1

22 posted on 06/22/2002 10:46:32 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
How the government thought they were going to cover up all these witnesses, Carol Howe, the judge that was warned, the fire and police officials that were warned, etc., I have no idea. OKC and TWA 800 are going to unravel. Our government is going to take a huge hit on this. And sadly, that's what should happen. These two cover-ups have been a despicable display of arrogance and manipulation. Thanks for the comments.
23 posted on 06/22/2002 11:10:41 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; The Great Satan
Ping
24 posted on 06/22/2002 11:12:57 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; the crow
You were so right about the execution of McVeigh being an error. Too many unanswered questions, I did think so at the time.
25 posted on 06/22/2002 11:15:24 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
BTTT
26 posted on 06/22/2002 11:16:22 AM PDT by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Thank you.
27 posted on 06/22/2002 11:21:27 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mickie
Did you see Greta's show Friday nite? She had on the reporter who has 22 signed affadavids(sp) by local folks who saw McVeigh and group WITH men from the Middle East.

You are the second person I have seen mention this (the other person was on a different thread). I am surprised, but pleased to hear Greta covered this topic.

I did not see it----is her show repeated over the weekend?

28 posted on 06/22/2002 11:22:18 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
What ever happened to the surveillance cameras that had recordings of John Doe and McVeigh?

Anything ever come of the reports that there were other bombs INSIDE the building that didn't explode and that the BATF took from the scene?

How about that retired USAF General who's analysis said that there HAD to have been other bombs inside the buiding, that the truck bomb was just a screen?

What did the FBI and BATF know and when did they know it?

29 posted on 06/22/2002 11:23:47 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
But there must be more to the cover ups than arrogance and manipulation (although there is plenty of both!) I just don't understand why they would not go public with the information that these were attacks by a foriegn power. After all, the foreign power in question (Iraq?) was already on the nose.

Also, these events may be tied to others, for there were a whole series of what looked like terrorist events in the 1990s, (such as that Israeli plane with chemical weapons on board, downed over Amsterdam. They said it was an accident. Hmmm.) But they went unclaimed and unexplained.

One of the weird things about the Oklahoma bombing, and more recent events, is that there was never any real announcement from the perpetrators. It is as if they, and the govt, are combining to keep it quiet. So it is a govt to govt threat, rather than ordinary terrorism? I just don't know.

30 posted on 06/22/2002 11:24:19 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: keri; Nogbad; Alamo-Girl; okie01; Shermy; My Identity; Ordinary_American
Ping. Sorry for any duplicates -- I've tried not to send this to people already on the thread.
31 posted on 06/22/2002 11:26:16 AM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
So it is a govt to govt threat, rather than ordinary terrorism?

In other words, just plain war. It's conceivable.

32 posted on 06/22/2002 11:27:22 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Thank you for speaking up at the time about the McVeigh execution. You really are a Doughty One. Were you wearing a flame proof suit? I didn't follow that case in detail, but I was never satisfied with the evidence, ever since I read how there was no forensic traces of explosives in the lockers of the accused, or any of their properties. So where was the stuff kept? The maker and keeper of the bomb is a central character, and knocking off the guy who planted it teaches us nothing.
33 posted on 06/22/2002 11:37:07 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
just plain war. It's conceivable. Shiver. You may be right. When considering these strange "terrorism without the publicity" events, getting worse each time until one arrives at Sept 11, inevitably I considered your theory about the US being subject to calculated threats by Iraq.
34 posted on 06/22/2002 11:46:19 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil; OKCSubmariner
Anyone else find it interesting that after the OKC bombing al Hussaini had a job at Logan International in Boston. And Davis, who was on FOX something like four times (that I saw) on Friday, mentioned something about al Hussaini filing a lawsuit that was later dismissed because Hussaini could offer nothing to back up his side of the case. And that the judge ruled that the info offered up by Davis was indeed factual (or legalese to that effect). Anyone know anything about this?
35 posted on 06/22/2002 11:50:39 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Re: The Honorable Judge:

Matsch’s Court in Colorado was obviously especially selected by Attorney General Janet Reno and minions in the Justice Department.

From the beginning, Matsch made absolute sure that the whole truth of the Oklahoma City bombing would never get out. Judge Matsch severely limited the evidence that McVeigh’s defense team could present to the jury. When McVeigh’s lawyers early on complained that the FBI and prosecutors were withholding documentation, Matsch shut them up. When they attempted to demonstrate that other individuals—and federal law enforcement—may have been involved or had advance knowledge of the bombing, Matsch refused to allow it.

36 posted on 06/22/2002 11:59:35 AM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump
37 posted on 06/22/2002 12:00:07 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Doesn't or didn't a Pakastani related private security firm handle some of the "security'at the Murrah Building in OKC ?
38 posted on 06/22/2002 12:03:28 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Here's another DOJ employee that should be investigated :

"...The McVeigh’s defense team tried to introduce evidence of participation in the bombing conspiracy by Strassmeir and Dennis Mahon through the testimony of BATF informant Carol Howe. Special Prosecutor Beth Wilkinson flat out lied to Judge Richard Matsch. She told the judge that Strassmeir was "A mere wisp of the wind." She said Strassmeir’s only problem was that he might have overstayed his visa. She falsely stated that the letters "A" and "O" on Strassmeir’s immigration record stood for "admitted" and "overstayed" respectively.

Wilkinson also falsely told the judge that Carol Howe had been fired by the BATF as mentally unstable and untrustworthy. She falsified the date Howe left the service of the BATF...."

39 posted on 06/22/2002 12:14:51 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
I believe the tapes were ordered "sealed" by The Honorable Judge Matsch.

"Nothing to see her sheeple...move along.."

40 posted on 06/22/2002 12:17:19 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson