Posted on 06/20/2002 5:49:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
Presidential reprimand moves representatives to action
NBC, MSNBC AND NEWS SERVICES
WASHINGTON, June 20 The chairmen of a joint congressional committee investigating pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures said Thursday they have asked the attorney general to investigate possible leaks of classified information by the panel.
Yellow Pages Auctions at uBid Personals Channel Professional Tips Newsletters Shopping
Profiles of suspects; leads being followed
WE WILL cooperate with the FBI in any way possible while the Justice Department and the FBI investigate if or how such leaks occurred, said Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Vice President Dick Cheney had complained to the two chairmen earlier Thursday about leaks that he believed led to the disclosure of the National Security Agencys Sept. 10 intercepts of at least two messages in Arabic. The messages suggested a major event was to take place the next day. At President Bushs direction, Cheney called Goss and Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to express the presidents concerns about this inappropriate disclosure, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said. Fleischer called the disclosure of the language of the NSA intercepts alarmingly specific. Although there had previously been reports of missed signals, Wednesdays leak specifically quoted from intercepts, something that never is done, NBC News reported. The intercepts had been discussed with the committee over the last two weeks and particularly in testimony on Tuesday. Advertisement
Goss said the Justice Department investigation was necessary because committee members are entrusted to keep classified information secret, and undercover operatives or U.S. officials could be endangered by such leaks. Weve got people out in harms way who are conducting a lot of serious business, Goss said.
ARABIC MESSAGES U.S. intelligence intercepted two Arabic messages the day before the Sept. 11 attacks that indicated an event was planned the following day, but the communications were not translated until Sept. 12, government sources said Wednesday. The NSA, which eavesdrops on communications worldwide, intercepted messages that said tomorrow is zero hour and the match begins tomorrow, sources said on condition of anonymity. Fleischer called the information that the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency are providing to the committee extraordinarily sensitive. The selective, inappropriate leaking of snippets of information risks undermining national security, and it risks undermining the promises made to protect this sensitive information, the White House spokesman said.
ON TV THIS WEEKEND: The world's smartest scientists and best doctors. Join Brian Williams for "Summit for a Cure" Sunday, June 23 at 8-10 p.m. ET only on MSNBC.
We do not know who did it, Fleischer said, but Cheneys phone call seemed to point a finger at the committees. Concern about possible leaks has been a key reason the White House has opposed setting up an independent commission to investigate the attacks. The commission has been sought by some lawmakers and relatives of the victims. Bush has said the intelligence panels were better-positioned to avoid leaks. They understand the obligations of upholding our secrets and our sources and methods of collecting intelligence, he said last month.
NOT A CREDIBLE WARNING On Wednesday intelligence officials strongly disputed reports that the intercepted conversations were a credible warning of the next days terrorist attacks. NBC News learned that the intercepted comments, which were discussed at a closed hearing of the House and Senate intelligence committees, were not from any known members of Osama bin Ladens al-Qaida network, which U.S. officials blame for the attacks. And they adamantly told NBC News that any attempt to connect the conversations to the Sept. 11 attacks indicated a significant misunderstanding of signals intelligence. NBC News has learned that the conversations did not involve members of al-Qaida and that analysts believe they were merely background chatter like most NSA-intercepted material, which comes in at the rate or 2 million or more signals every hour.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
THE HOME FRONT Ridge presents plan for homeland security MSNBC: Aviation security test remains secret Deal reached on classified evidence in Lindh trial Complete coverage THE WAR ABROAD Two key al-Qaida leaders jailed in Morocco, Syria Saudis deny access to arrested terror suspects U.S. faulted in deaths of Canadian soldiers Complete coverage
Intelligence officials maintained Wednesday that the words the match begins tomorrow, plucked from the data stream without context, were essentially meaningless because analysts could not know what the larger conversation was even about. A U.S. intelligence official, while declining to comment on the NSA intercepts, said a piece of raw intelligence that contains only a date provides little useful information. The official said that both before and after Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence frequently has received threat information that consists of only a date and a vague notion something will happen and then, nothing happens. They suggested that the conversations had been leaked by opponents of the security agencies under investigation on Capitol Hill, among them the CIA and the FBI, which have been sharply criticized for failing to coordinate their efforts before Sept. 11. Hill critics of the agencies have been peddling this for weeks, one of the officials told NBCs Andrea Mitchell.
NBCs Andrea Mitchell, MSNBC.coms Alex Johnson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Of course, immediately CNN broadcast them verbatim.
I hope CNN is prosecuted as well.
LOL! Maybe Alan Greenspan was not amused.
Who said "Send in the clowns"? I think it was Mark Twain who said that Congress is America's only native criminal class.
And this is so typical of their performance, no matter how many promises of secrecy are made by the head clowns.
But it has stirred up both Dubya and Cheney. Maybe some good will come from it.
Do you know if they have to swear an oath? A legally binding 'under penalty of perjury' oath? If so, they should be prosecuted. Under any circumstance, this is the one time that GWB should name names and point fingers.
Good. Now let's get polygraphs on all the committee members.
Whoever did this needs to be publically humiliated and drummed out of congress. They are risking the security of the American people.
btw....what does Word Wrap mean when you post...LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.