Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress calls for leak investigation: Presidential reprimand moves representatives to action
MSNBC ^ | 20 July 2002 | Andrea Mitchell, Alex Johnson

Posted on 06/20/2002 5:49:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom

Presidential reprimand moves representatives to action

NBC, MSNBC AND NEWS SERVICES

WASHINGTON, June 20 — The chairmen of a joint congressional committee investigating pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures said Thursday they have asked the attorney general to investigate possible leaks of classified information by the panel.

• Yellow Pages • Auctions at uBid • Personals Channel • Professional Tips • Newsletters • Shopping

• Profiles of suspects; leads being followed

“WE WILL cooperate with the FBI in any way possible” while the Justice Department and the FBI investigate if or how such leaks occurred, said Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Vice President Dick Cheney had complained to the two chairmen earlier Thursday about leaks that he believed led to the disclosure of the National Security Agency’s Sept. 10 intercepts of at least two messages in Arabic. The messages suggested a major event was to take place the next day. At President Bush’s direction, Cheney called Goss and Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, “to express the president’s concerns about this inappropriate disclosure,” White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said. Fleischer called the disclosure of the language of the NSA intercepts “alarmingly specific.” Although there had previously been reports of missed signals, Wednesday’s leak specifically quoted from intercepts, something that never is done, NBC News reported. The intercepts had been discussed with the committee over the last two weeks and particularly in testimony on Tuesday. Advertisement

Goss said the Justice Department investigation was necessary because committee members are entrusted to keep classified information secret, and undercover operatives or U.S. officials could be endangered by such leaks. “We’ve got people out in harm’s way who are conducting a lot of serious business,” Goss said.

ARABIC MESSAGES U.S. intelligence intercepted two Arabic messages the day before the Sept. 11 attacks that indicated an event was planned the following day, but the communications were not translated until Sept. 12, government sources said Wednesday. The NSA, which eavesdrops on communications worldwide, intercepted messages that said “tomorrow is zero hour” and “the match begins tomorrow,” sources said on condition of anonymity. Fleischer called the information that the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency are providing to the committee “extraordinarily sensitive.” “The selective, inappropriate leaking of snippets of information risks undermining national security, and it risks undermining the promises made to protect this sensitive information,” the White House spokesman said.

ON TV THIS WEEKEND: • The world's smartest scientists and best doctors. Join Brian Williams for "Summit for a Cure" Sunday, June 23 at 8-10 p.m. ET only on MSNBC.

“We do not know who did it,” Fleischer said, but Cheney’s phone call seemed to point a finger at the committees. Concern about possible leaks has been a key reason the White House has opposed setting up an independent commission to investigate the attacks. The commission has been sought by some lawmakers and relatives of the victims. Bush has said the intelligence panels were better-positioned to avoid leaks. They “understand the obligations of upholding our secrets and our sources and methods of collecting intelligence,” he said last month.

‘NOT A CREDIBLE WARNING’ On Wednesday intelligence officials strongly disputed reports that the intercepted conversations were a credible warning of the next day’s terrorist attacks. NBC News learned that the intercepted comments, which were discussed at a closed hearing of the House and Senate intelligence committees, were not from any known members of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida network, which U.S. officials blame for the attacks. And they adamantly told NBC News that any attempt to connect the conversations to the Sept. 11 attacks indicated a significant misunderstanding of signals intelligence. NBC News has learned that the conversations did not involve members of al-Qaida and that analysts believe they were merely “background chatter” like most NSA-intercepted material, which comes in at the rate or 2 million or more signals every hour.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

THE HOME FRONT • Ridge presents plan for homeland security • MSNBC: Aviation security test remains secret • Deal reached on classified evidence in Lindh trial • Complete coverage THE WAR ABROAD • Two key al-Qaida leaders jailed in Morocco, Syria • Saudis deny access to arrested terror suspects • U.S. faulted in deaths of Canadian soldiers • Complete coverage

Intelligence officials maintained Wednesday that the words “the match begins tomorrow,” plucked from the data stream without context, were essentially meaningless because analysts could not know what the larger conversation was even about. A U.S. intelligence official, while declining to comment on the NSA intercepts, said a piece of raw intelligence that contains only a date provides little useful information. The official said that both before and after Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence frequently has received threat information that consists of only a date and a vague notion something will happen — and then, nothing happens. They suggested that the conversations had been leaked by opponents of the security agencies under investigation on Capitol Hill, among them the CIA and the FBI, which have been sharply criticized for failing to coordinate their efforts before Sept. 11. “Hill critics of the agencies have been peddling this for weeks,” one of the officials told NBC’s Andrea Mitchell.

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, MSNBC.com’s Alex Johnson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: houseleaker; senateleaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Ann Archy
My, oh, my, ma'am, but you do have a devious mind!
21 posted on 06/20/2002 6:18:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bush and Cheney knew Democrats could not resist leaking. That leads to several possibilities:

  1. The classified information given to Congress was marked so the identity of the leaker could be discovered.

  2. It was not feasible to mark the information but Bush and Cheney will lead Democrats to believe it was. Fear of discovery is a good way to keep them in line.

  3. They were given disinformation to leak. Muslim terrorists are not stupid. They know Democrats are traitors. They will believe anything Democrats leak. Even if it is not true.

22 posted on 06/20/2002 6:19:03 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Howlin
Does Edwards appear on CNN a lot? I got the impression that the leak was to them.
23 posted on 06/20/2002 6:19:55 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Carl Cameron was talking about this today. Apparently a lot of media had the information, but they were asked not to reveal the phrases because the use of those phrases would let the perps know when and where they were heard.

Of course, immediately CNN broadcast them verbatim.

I hope CNN is prosecuted as well.

24 posted on 06/20/2002 6:20:08 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
He's on with Wolfe a LOT on Sundays.
25 posted on 06/20/2002 6:20:30 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Why would they do that? If they had been asked not to, why did they?
26 posted on 06/20/2002 6:22:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I am not sure where it was first reported -- I asked that earlier today and someone told me CNN but I haven't verified it.
27 posted on 06/20/2002 6:22:29 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Was impressed with the reporting by Andrea Mitchell on this story -- she was genuinely upset that someone from this Committee had leaked.

LOL! Maybe Alan Greenspan was not amused.

Who said "Send in the clowns"? I think it was Mark Twain who said that Congress is America's only native criminal class.

And this is so typical of their performance, no matter how many promises of secrecy are made by the head clowns.

But it has stirred up both Dubya and Cheney. Maybe some good will come from it.

28 posted on 06/20/2002 6:24:50 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It's my best trait!!!!! LOL!
29 posted on 06/20/2002 6:25:23 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Why would they do this? Because they are evil.
30 posted on 06/20/2002 6:25:29 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Let's not be too quick to assume there was a single 'leaker'. Several leakers would give plausible deniability along the lines of 'How could you possibly think it was moi...you should check out ___'.

Do you know if they have to swear an oath? A legally binding 'under penalty of perjury' oath? If so, they should be prosecuted. Under any circumstance, this is the one time that GWB should name names and point fingers.

31 posted on 06/20/2002 6:26:01 PM PDT by Fracas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple
Would have to think it is someone that appears on TV a lot and to me Edwards fills that bill. I cannot believe CNN went with the story when asked not to but then I shouldn't be surprised. What shocked me was the depth of anger in Andrea Mitchell that this had been leaked!
32 posted on 06/20/2002 6:26:35 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This is war time. The FBI needs to be monitoring ANY AND ALL SUSPECTS who pose a danger to the US. It's time for a major sting operation. If I were a democRAT with a big mouth, I'd be nervous about now. This is an election year and stakes are high.
33 posted on 06/20/2002 6:27:31 PM PDT by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
“WE WILL cooperate with the FBI in any way possible”

Good. Now let's get polygraphs on all the committee members.

34 posted on 06/20/2002 6:28:24 PM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That's my pick too Howlin. I think once they sic the FBI/CIA on them the traitor will be exposed pretty quick. Actually, the entire committee and their staff should have been under surveilance from the very beginning.

Whoever did this needs to be publically humiliated and drummed out of congress. They are risking the security of the American people.

35 posted on 06/20/2002 6:29:06 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Unfortunately,I have to put Sen. Richard Shelby,Republican,( ex Dem) from Alabama, into the mix-his behavior the last few months has been anti Bush, anti CIA, anti FBI, anti administration, anti everything and he appears to have never met a camera or talk show, he didn't like. There were also serious rumors floating around DC, that he was going to do a Jeffords- which he has denied.
36 posted on 06/20/2002 6:31:17 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
How's it going? Maybe you are right -- Greenspan didn't like it!

How about them Sooners? Sure hope they live up to their pre-season projection! Could be an interesting year! Awaiting your prediction! Sure wish I would have bet on your prediction in 2000!

I was shocked at Andrea Mitchell's reporting and still am. This isn't the first time though I have seen her reporting it right down the middle with no bias. Noticed that quite a bit lately.
37 posted on 06/20/2002 6:31:23 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Are the committee members staff allowed to sit in on these hearings?

btw....what does Word Wrap mean when you post...LOL

38 posted on 06/20/2002 6:32:40 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Agreed. As I have said before, the BIGGEST problem to national security right now is leaks- not terrorists.
39 posted on 06/20/2002 6:34:31 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Shelby has been out in front of lot bashing -- he used to be a RAT before coming across the aisle but I heard these were rumors started by the clinton staff. I cannot see him leaking to the press even though he has not been happy.
40 posted on 06/20/2002 6:34:33 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson