Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watergate Was Not the Worst -
National Review Online ^ | 6/17/02 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 06/17/2002 1:04:54 PM PDT by wcdukenfield

Have you heard? Today is the 30th anniversary of the Watergate break-in. You'd have to be living in a cave in Afghanistan to have missed all the media hype and hyperbole of the last few days. And, of course, Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and Ben Bradlee are reminding us that Richard Nixon was the most contemptible man to ever serve as president.

Let's look briefly at this self-serving contention. Nixon tried to cover-up the Watergate burglary, despite the fact he had no knowledge of it in advance. Among other things, he urged his staffers to lie, he might have endorsed the payment of hush money, and he delayed the FBI's investigation of the break-in for a short period of time by falsely claiming CIA involvement.

Now, I know Woodward, Bernstein, and Bradlee have a much longer litany of crimes and transgressions. However, as bad as Watergate was, it was not the most deplorable scandal in modern American history. Putting aside Bill Clinton's serial felonies; LBJ's self-dealing and personal enrichment; JFK's underworld connections and relations with a known East German spy (and his brother's illegal tapping of Martin Luther King Jr.'s telephone); the dishonor of having committed the most egregious violation of our Constitution belongs to that liberal icon whose profile appears on America's ten-cent piece — Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

August 7 is the 60th anniversary of the Roosevelt administration's completion of its removal of about 120,000 Japanese-American citizens and legal residents from the Pacific Coast. I wonder how much coverage this will receive in the mainstream media? Not much, I'm sure. So here's a brief chronology of events leading to this most deplorable of all presidential actions, the source of which is the Harry Truman Presidential Library website:

December 30, 1941: FDR's attorney general, Francis Biddle, authorizes raids without a search warrant on the homes of people of Japanese descent as long as at least one resident is a Japanese alien.

February 19, 1942: FDR issues Executive Order 9066 authorizing the Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, or any military commander designated by Stimson, to designate "military areas" and exclude "any and all persons" from them.

March 2, 1942: The Western Defense Command proclaims the western parts of California, Oregon, and Washington state, and the southern third of Arizona as military areas and that all people of Japanese descent are to be removed.

March 18, 1942: FDR issues Executive Order 9102 establishing the War Relocation Authority (WRA), which is authorized "to provide for the removal from designated areas of persons whose removal is necessary in the interests of national security."

March 21, 1942: FDR signs Public Law 77-503, making it a federal crime for a person to refuse an order to leave a military area.

March 22, 1942: On this date, and for the next 18 months, people of Japanese descent are removed from the Pacific Coast area to ten relocation centers in California, Arizona, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Arkansas.

Despite FDR's record of wholesale human-rights and constitutional violations, he's consistently rated the greatest, or among the greatest, presidents in American history by historians and academics. Somehow, they conveniently overlook their hero's unprecedented abuse of power (I haven't even addressed FDR's brazen assault on the U.S. Supreme Court).

Say what they will about Richard Nixon. Even if most or all if it is accurate, he was no Franklin Delano Roosevelt.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: fdr; japanese; nixon; watergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2002 1:04:54 PM PDT by wcdukenfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
bttt
2 posted on 06/17/2002 1:06:11 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
IMHO FDR qualifies for sainthood compared to WJC and the Hildebeast.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

3 posted on 06/17/2002 1:13:48 PM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Say what they will about Richard Nixon. Even if most or all if it is accurate, he was no Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Watergate isn't about abuse of political office.

It's about the left-wing media tearing down a president they didn't care for.

The media has propped-up presidencies that were far more abusive.

4 posted on 06/17/2002 1:14:29 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
I'm sure the Democrats and the media would still be beating Republicans over the head with this incident, had it been a Republican President who did this.
5 posted on 06/17/2002 1:14:52 PM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
I'm getting really tired of the networks wheeling out geriatric has-beens Woodward & Bernstein to retell their Watergate stories in grave tones every damn June. Especially after the last administration.

Lying sacks of crap - I wonder if the young people, who they are hoping to inculcate with impressions of a hopelessly corrupt GOP, are even interested in their little annual presentation?

6 posted on 06/17/2002 1:18:02 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
"Now, I know Woodward, Bernstein, and Bradlee have a much longer litany of crimes and transgressions. However, as bad as Watergate was, it was not the most deplorable scandal in modern American history."

To them, it was. First, because the subject was a Republican. But MORE important - it was THEIR scandal. If Teddy Kenedy himself were to personally finance, smuggle in, and detonate fifty thermonuclear devices over the top fifty markets in the US, Watergate would still be a bigger story to Woodward/Bernstein/Bradlee - because THEY covered it. Seldom before have two reporters and a creative editor had such self-delusions of grandeur.

Michael

7 posted on 06/17/2002 1:22:16 PM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
IMHO FDR qualifies for sainthood compared to WJC and the Hildebeast.

Hey Harp, my opinion is, that in some ways, LBJ was worse than Clinton. He got 58,000 some Americans killed in Nam, so he could beat Goldwater. What do you think?

8 posted on 06/17/2002 1:24:10 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
It's about the left-wing media tearing down a president they didn't care for.

It's about the left-wing media tearing down a president they despised due to his (Nixon's) anti-communist position and bringing to light communist spys in the US in the 50's. Spys that were "liked" by the left media.

9 posted on 06/17/2002 1:26:58 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
BTTT
10 posted on 06/17/2002 1:27:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
It's about the left-wing media tearing down a president they didn't care for.

Thats a side story that no one is going to take serious untio the Woodward's and his ilk are gone. The press went almost overnight from supporting LBJ's failed war policies to attacking the Nixon adminstration for the war. It was really quite amazing.

In regards to this article and FDR...I remember before the Y2K "Time" magazine was to select their "Person of the Century". Now to most historians the most important person was Winston Churchill, who along with the British people basically held off totalitarianism by themselves while teetering on the brink. They literally fanned the flames of freedom long enough for the USA to get into the war and thus save the Western, modernized world., since WWII was the hinge on the change of powers this century.

But no, "Time" wanted to unaminously vote for FDR. While important, Churchill actually had more accomplishments than FDR and was the clear favorite. But not in the minds of the liberal establishment, who could never nominate a conservative over their demigod FDR. "Time" then said Churchill was not good "on women's rights", which is a farce. By the same standard, FDR's nomination should have been rejected outright for his internment of the Japanese, his rejection of the Jewish refugee ship St. Louis, and his failure to racially integrate the armed services.

In order to get out of this hypocritical embarassment, "Time" named Albert Einstein as the "Person of the Century".

11 posted on 06/17/2002 1:32:15 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
One of my favorite topics recently. The left wing hated Nixon because he was conservative, because he had opposed communism, but mostly Bradlee was part of the Kennedy machine and the Kennedy's hated Nixon so Voila - Watergate.

There is a great book, written in 1975 by Victor Lasky, called "It didn't start with Watergate" which details all the abuses of the democratic presidents, specifically FDR, JFK and LBJ - wiretaps, blackmail, financial transactions, and much much more. Lasky makes the great points that these transgressions were aided and abetted not just by the left wing press but also by democratically controlled congress. I think this is an often overlooked point, which is the key role the CONGRESS had in bringing down Nixon and the incredible double standards all these congressional committees used in deciding who or what they would go after and who or what got a free pass. Unfreaking believable.

And just to be accurate if you want to look at perhaps the worst of FDRs abuses, it was the attempt to pack the US Supremee court (1939?) when he was repudiated and stopped by his own party.

12 posted on 06/17/2002 1:38:16 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
EVERYTHING concerning the left's hatred for Nixon can be traced to his success in busting communists, and the repercussions among their friends in Hollywood and the media. My father always told us this, and my father was right.
13 posted on 06/17/2002 1:44:59 PM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Let's see who gets what on judgement day. I have a feeling Nixon will be judged in a much better light than a lot of these lying jackels.
14 posted on 06/17/2002 1:50:46 PM PDT by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
It's about the left-wing media tearing down a president they didn't care for.

That's all it was about. Watergate was a coverup about a search for anarchists who conspired to tear down institutions. How is that so bad compared to the "accomplishments" of FDR and JFK?

15 posted on 06/17/2002 2:02:17 PM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Talk about beatin' a dead horse....

Has anyone noticed how the liberal media's salivating over the "Watergate Anniversary" like it's a National holiday.

16 posted on 06/17/2002 2:54:58 PM PDT by gitmogrunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
CNN was on about 5:40 pm Eastern Standard. Tried to avoid it to get away from the regret, I still feel.(At Nixon's demise). His final words, about not hating, still leave an indelible impression. Spouse had CNN on. I wished I had just walked away. Never mind, herewith thoughts: (in Canada at the time though). One. Statement to David Frost- oops Sir David. Frost, why don't you finally dry up? .

Two. Woodward, oh ,you pious, sanctimonious, holier than thou and no doubt "crusading journalist"- you are like an old has been athelete, riding on some trophy or other. You keep polishing it up and getting invites, yeah Woodward, you are caught on a never ending rubber chicken circuit.

Finally, Rest in Peace Mr President Nixon, may the earth lie lightly on you. Wow, feels better now. A lot better, after CNN. Oh, Deep Throat? ah, well nevermind, do not want to overstay my welcome.

17 posted on 06/17/2002 3:24:12 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Watergate 30 Years Later
Slideshow

http://www.dallasnews.com//slideshows/06-02/17watergate/1.html
18 posted on 06/17/2002 4:23:40 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
How right you are! FDR was fascinated with the Brits. He wanted to do everything the way they did (like the Marine Raiders modeled on the British Commandos). Churchill was able, at least in the beginning of US involvement in the war, to lead FDR around and basically tell him where to spend the money. FDR was the antithesis of a war "leader".
19 posted on 06/17/2002 4:30:55 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
See also the book "Silent Coup: The Removal of Richard Nixon" by Len Colodny, Robert Gettlin.
20 posted on 06/17/2002 4:33:01 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson