Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Touts Low - Income Homes Plan
AP ^ | 15 June 2002 | AP

Posted on 06/16/2002 6:31:16 AM PDT by SBeck

Bush Touts Low - Income Homes Plan
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) -- President Bush pitched a plan to make it easier for black people and Hispanics to become homeowners through government incentives and grants to help on down payments.

In his weekly radio address Saturday, the president said he wants to remove obstacles ``that prevent minorities from owning a piece of the American dream.''

Bush noted that while three-quarters of white Americans own their own homes, fewer than half of all black and Hispanic Americans are homeowners.

``We must begin to close this homeownership gap by dismantling the barriers that prevent minorities from owning a piece of the American dream,'' said Bush, spending Father's Day weekend at his own home on his Texas ranch.

Bush has proposed giving developers almost $2.4 billion in tax credits over five years for building affordable single-family homes in low-income areas. The White House estimates the tax incentive could translate into construction of 200,000 lower-cost homes in the period.

Addressing his radio audience, Bush proposed a $200-million expansion to the American Dream Down Payment Fund, first outlined in January and awaiting action by Congress. It would provide grants to help about 40,000 families a year pay down payments or closing costs on houses. Most grants would be less than $5,000. The money would be distributed by state and local housing programs.

The radio address was a preview of a speech Bush is to make Monday in Atlanta to promote his broad housing agenda, which he summarized as ``empowering people to help themselves and to help one another.''

Bush plans a stop at south Atlanta's Pryor Road area, where housing development is replacing dilapidated and crime-ridden strip malls.

The program currently has a budget of $50 million and is to begin offering grants in July.

``The single greatest hurdle to first-time homeownership is a high down payment requirement that can put a home out of reach,'' Bush said Saturday. ``When a low-income family is qualified to buy a home but comes up short on the down payment, the American Dream Down Payment Fund will help provide the funds.''

Bush also urged better consumer education to help would-be buyers avoid pitfalls that often arise to obtaining affordable mortgages.

``Education is the best protection for families against abusive and unscrupulous lenders,'' Bush said.

``Financial education and housing counseling can help protect home buyers against abuses, greatly improve the loan terms they are offered and help families get through tough times with their homes intact.''


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: homeownership; lowincome; taxpayerfunded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: SBeck
A typical liberal approach to a problem: Throw money at a problem and it will go away. Forget cause and effect, just throw money at it. Don't these people realize poverty is a state of mind and until people change their minds, money will only exacerbate the problem.

Another program that will end up costing BILLIONS of our dollars with 20% of us paying for it thru higher taxes in the future.

As for those of you who support this man with blind loyalty , I remind you that the dem's domestic programs are being implemented, so, please tell me where there is a difference between the parties.

He's backsliding on his own doctrine on terrorism also.

He is creating a incredible voting block with all these handouts. Who would be foolish enough to vote against their own paycheck? Give people who need it a hand, not a handout and make them pay it back when they get on their feet.

Once the "passion of patriotism" subsides, this man will have nothing, but, what the hey, I wear a tin foil hat.

21 posted on 06/16/2002 8:27:26 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily
This was the theory of the Great Society which also tried to use hand-outs to 'lift' people into the middle class. This is yet another example of the same old bankrupt welfare state philosophy of something for nothing and blatant vote buying.
22 posted on 06/16/2002 8:32:11 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cable225
Ike, Nixon, Bush I, also pursued similar pro-welfare policies to "steal the Democrats thunder." The Democrats who controlled the Congress during those administrations only benefited from this approach. The Machievellian policy you favor will backfire and November will be an example!
23 posted on 06/16/2002 8:34:29 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Looks like more of a wierd marriage of socialism and fascism to me. The social welfare and corporate welfare programs are both benefiting, the middle class taxpayer is being destroyed
24 posted on 06/16/2002 8:40:04 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: poet
He is creating a incredible voting block with all these handouts.

I guess he doesn't need his base anymore, you know, those who work their butts off to provide for their families, which includes saving for a down payment on a home.

25 posted on 06/16/2002 8:41:40 AM PDT by rapsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Nope, not an Onion piece.
26 posted on 06/16/2002 8:46:49 AM PDT by SBeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SBeck
I think some of the posters above have it right. This is just another social program that will fail. I hate to see my tax dollars wasted on this nonsense. Home ownership is motivating when you have to foot the bills on your own. You tend to take care of things that break or need maintenance. Low income subsidies are no substitute for self-reliance or pride in one's accomplishments. This article brings to mind all of the federally subsidized housing projects in numerous cities across the Nation. I have yet to see one of these housing projects that is maintained by its occupants to meet minimum standards of repair. They are uniformly slovenly, crime ridden, rat infested, and vandalized by their own residents. It wasn't their money that went into building and maintaining these apartments. GWB has been contradictory in his policy efforts. I like it that Gore is not POTUS but GWB misses the mark often. One moment he is conservative, the next a socialist.
27 posted on 06/16/2002 8:47:53 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush
It's stuff like this that makes me question my sanity. Are we living in a farce? There is no way the Constitution can be honestly interpreted to give the federal government this power.

Yet hardly a question is raised or an eyelash batted... not by the press, not by the public, not by anyone. A few disgruntled folks on a thread at FR, and that's about it.

So what can you say? Welcome to post-constitutional America, I guess.

At least president Bush keeps his pants on; for that I am thankful.

28 posted on 06/16/2002 8:55:44 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
At least president Bush keeps his pants on; for that I am thankful.

Yes, I'm thankful for that too, but I'd like it if he kept his hand out of my wallet at the same time.

29 posted on 06/16/2002 8:58:18 AM PDT by SBeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rapsux
The social welfare and corporate welfare programs are both benefiting, the middle class taxpayer is being destroyed

It does seem the destrucion of the middle class is the goal of far too many politicians. The dem's disdain for the middle class has been apparent for years, but I thought the republicans were on the side of the middle class. I guess I was wrong.

30 posted on 06/16/2002 9:02:06 AM PDT by rapsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SBeck
Yeah, I hear what you're saying.
31 posted on 06/16/2002 9:14:49 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
This was the theory of the Great Society which also tried to use hand-outs to 'lift' people into the middle class.

Middle class seems to be a world view rather then a matter of material possessions. It seems the Great Society programs were such a failure at least in part because they were only concerned with the redistribution of wealth rather then the recipients attitudes towards work, family, etc.

32 posted on 06/16/2002 9:22:04 AM PDT by rapsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: winodog
He rants and raves about this every time I see him.

I don't blame him! All liberal entitlement programs reward undesirable behaviors and punish desirable behaviors.

Personally, I'd rather see a black family helped to acheive home ownership--as a family-- than have them paid to have illigitiment babies.

33 posted on 06/16/2002 9:23:43 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abclily
This is wonderful news! There's nothing like the pride of ownership to turn a welfare-minded citizen into a self-reliant citizen.

I would hope that someone was a self-reliant citizen first. This only reinforces dependency on government. The response will be "the government got me my home."

I live in a middle-class townhouse development of which most of the owners are recent immigrants. I applaud all of them that have worked hard and saved to be able to make their first home purchase (although I wish that some had left the third world back in the third world). How are they able to do it while other minorities have not? Perhaps different ethics - work hard and save?

I would be more accepting of some type of tax break for all Americans to help them save up for a down payment. It took us every nickel we had to get ours together and making the payments with the PMI is not easy, but we are doing it.

What this does is simply put one group against another. If I choose not to live in a "low-income area" I can't qualify. Of course, being a white male would probably disqulaify me outright. So my money is being extracted to give to someone else so they can simply ask for the down payment money while we scrimped and saved to get ours.

Also, what about minorities that want to get a house so they can escape the high crime and degradation of the inner cities? I was recently in Charlotte looking at houses. We were not completely familiar with all of the surrounding areas so we drove to several locations that had home listings priced where we could afford them. The first place we went was beautiful. Every home was immaculate (at least the outsides). They must have put untold hours into maintaining their yards. Then we noticed that all of the owners were black. These people worked hard and saved so that they could escape the problems of the ghetto and none of them would have gotten any help from this program.

I see this as nothing but another feel-good, doomed to failure, handout program. Kemp tried some similar deal with his "enterprise zones" that failed miserably. The only way to make a difference along these lines is to alter the mindset of people that aren't doing the right thing.

I am furious at this administration. He has one good appointee - Rumsfeld. The rest only qualify as better than what we had under Clinton (or only marginally less of an embarrasment). To me, that is just not good enough. He is using the same tactics Clinton did. Just go along with the other party to steal their thunder. Given a choice it might be better to have a Democrat that goes along with the Republican initiatives rather that a Republican that goes along with all of the Democrat initiatives.

I had to hold my nose to vote for Bush in 2000. Will I be able to hold my nose again in 2004. The way things are going, it is going to be much more difficult.

34 posted on 06/16/2002 9:53:55 AM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SBeck
This is just another scam to bleed off billions of tax dollars to well-connected "developers" and political cronies of both parties. Nothing compares to real estate, "urban development", and mortgage money scams, if you want to steal billions and get away with it.

Remember the S&L "scandal"? That was over $300 billion, mostly in real estate scams. Remember that $59 billion dollars that HUD still can't account for?

All of it paid for with your and my tax money. Who benefited? Hint: it wasn't Democrats or Republicans, it was both. The only difference betweens the Rs and the Ds anymore is the same difference there is between the Gotti family and the Bonanno family. It's still organized crime, IMHO. Where do I sign up? When do I get a chance to play?

35 posted on 06/16/2002 10:17:42 AM PDT by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
I don't blame him! All liberal entitlement programs reward undesirable behaviors and punish desirable behaviors

Bingo!! He also says he cant get a job even if he was able to work because they would cancel his insurance. He is on the list for a liver transplant and there is no way he can afford it.

He did sell his home to stay on welfare.

36 posted on 06/16/2002 10:23:33 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: abclily
Amen. Now if Bush will only veto the bankruptcy "reform" bill. parsy.
37 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:23 AM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
The government has created the problem by keeping minimum wages at a less-than-subsistence point. (Something even Karl Marx never thought capitalists would fall below!). The gov't has to do something to fix some of the problems it has created. parsy.
38 posted on 06/16/2002 10:31:03 AM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SR71A
The difference between the two is what I have heard a few times here at FR. Today's dems are actually socialist's and reps are democrats.
39 posted on 06/16/2002 10:31:41 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SBeck
The headline is misleading - it talks about "low-income", while the first sentence of the article profiles a target audidence.

There used to be a concept in this country, I can't remember the name of it, where private businesses could make a profit by providing goods ands services to people. Now, it takes special credits and tax breaks. What was that called?

40 posted on 06/16/2002 10:34:38 AM PDT by Bernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson